Save 30% on all 2023 Study Packages with Code: BLACKFRIDAY30. Valid until Nov. 28th.

The Unit Root Test for Nonstationary

The Unit Root Test for Nonstationary

Unit root testing involves checking whether the time series is covariance stationary. We can either form an AR model and check for autocorrelations or perform a Dickey and Fuller test.

A t-test is performed to examine the statistical significance of autocorrelations at various lags. The autocorrelations of a stationary process will be insignificantly different from zero at all lags or decrease rapidly to zero as the number of lags becomes large.

Recall that an AR (1) model is said to be covariance stationary if the absolute value of  is less than 1. Additionally, the time series will have a unit root if the lag coefficient equals 1. However, random walks with drift are NOT covariance stationary. Therefore, we cannot use standard linear regression to test for covariance stationary Dickey-Fuller unit root test is therefore used to test for unit roots.

Dickey-Fuller Test

The Dickey-Fuller test uses the transformed AR(1) model by substracting  from both sides of the equation. i.e.,

$$\text{x}_{\text{t}}=\text{b}_{0}+b_{1}x_{t-1}+\epsilon_{t}$$

$$\text{x}_{\text{t}}-\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}=\text{b}_{0}+\text{b}_{1}\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}-\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}+\epsilon_{\text{t}}$$

$$\text{x}_{\text{t}}-\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}=\text{b}_{0}+\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}(\text{b}_{1}-1)+\epsilon_{\text{t}}$$

Let the transformed coefficient, \(\text{b}_{1}-1=\text{g}\). Then,

$$\text{x}_{\text{t}}-\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}=\text{b}_{0}+\text{g}_{1}\text{x}_{\text{t}-1}+\epsilon_{\text{t}}$$

We then perform a t-test with the null hypothesis \(\text{H}_{0}:\text{g}_{1}=0\) (a test of \(\text{b}_1={1}\), which implies the time-series has a unit root), against the alternative hypothesis \(\text{H}_{\text{a}}:\text{g}_{1}<0\) (a test of \(\text{b}_1={1}\), which implies the time series has no unit root).

If \(\text{g}_{1}\) is not significantly different from 0, then \(\text{b}_{1}= 0\), the series must have a unit root. The null hypothesis will be rejected if the time series does not have a unit root. On the other hand, failure to reject the null hypothesis means that the time series has a unit root.

A time series with a unit root problem can be modeled by modeling the first differenced series with an autoregressive time series.

Question

If the null hypothesis \(\text{H}_{0}:\text{g}_1=0\) under the Dickey-Fuller test cannot be rejected; the most accurate conclusion is that:

  1. The time series is covariance stationary.
  2. The time series does not have a unit root.
  3. The time series has a unit root.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

If the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, then \(\text{b}_1-1=0\) and \(\text{b}_1=1\). This implies that the time series has a unit root. If the null hypothesis is rejected, the time series does not have a unit root.

A is incorrect. Rejection of the null hypothesis implies that \(\text{b}_1-1=0\) and so the time series has a unit root. However, a time series with a unit root is not covariance stationary.

Reading 3: 

LOS 3 (k) Describe the steps of the unit root test for nonstationary and explain the relation of the test to autoregressive time-series models.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.