Adjusted Coefficient of Determination

Adjusted Coefficient of Determination

Multiple R2

The multiple coefficients of determination, R2, can be used to test the overall usefulness of the overall set of independent variables in explaining the dependent variable. Multiple R2 can be interpreted as the percentage of the dependent variables’ total variability that can be collectively explained by all the independent variables.

It is calculated similarly to the case of the simple regression model:

$$\begin{align*}R^{2}&=\frac{\text{Total Variation}-\text{Unexplained Variation}}{\text{Total Variation}} \\&= \frac{\text{Regression Sum of Squares (RSS)}}{\text{Total Variation (SST)}}\end{align*}$$

However, multiple Ris less useful in measuring the goodness of fit of a multiple regression model. This is because it increases each time you add new independent variables, even if the variation explained by them may not be statistically significant. An overfitted model contains deceptively high multiple R2 values thus have a decreased ability to make precise predictions.

Adjusted R2

Adjusted R2 , \(\overline{R}^{2}\), adjusts for the number of independent variables in the model. Its value increases only when the added independent variables improve the fit of the regression model. Furthermore, it decreases when the added variables do not improve the model fit by a good enough amount.

The relationship between \(R^{2}\) and \(\overline{R}^{2}\) is expressed as:

$$\overline{R}^{2}=1-\bigg(\frac{n-1}{n-k-1}\bigg)(1-R^{2})$$

Where:

  • n = number of observations.
  • k = number of the independent variables (slope coefficients).

The adjusted \(\overline{R}^{2}\) can be negative if \(R^{2}\) is low enough. However, multiple \(R^{2}\) is always positive.

Example: Multiple R2 vs. Adjusted R2

Consider the following table showing the number of independent variables and the corresponding R2 and the adjusted R2.

$$\small{\begin{array}{c|c|c} {\textbf{No of Independent}\\ \textbf{Variables}}&\bf{R^{2}}&\textbf{Adjusted } \bf{R^{2}}\\ \hline1 & 75.4 & 74.3 \\ \hline2 & 89.2 & 88.1\\ \hline3 & 90.7 & 89.2\\ \hline4 & 92.4 & 85.6\\ \hline5 & 93.2 & 84.0\\  \end{array}}$$

Notice the following key points from the above table:

  • Adjusted R2 is always less than or equal to the multiple R2.
  • Multiple R2 is greater than the adjusted R2 when the number of independent variables is at least one.
  • As the number of independent variables increases, adjusted R2 increases up to a certain point (in this case 3 independent variables), beyond which it starts decreasing.
  • One might want to include only three independent variables in their regression model.

The fact that the regression model has a high adjusted R2 does not mean that it is based on only the correct variables. Several other factors need to be considered before concluding that the model is well specified.

Question

Which of the following is most appropriate about adjusted R2?

     A. It is nondecreasing in the number of independent variables.

     B. It may or may not increase when one adds an independent variable.

     C. It is always positive.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

The value of the adjusted R2 increases only when the added independent variables improve the fit of the regression model. Moreover, it decreases when the added variables do not improve the model fit by a good enough amount.

A is incorrect. The adjusted R2 can decrease when the added variables do not improve the model fit by a good enough amount. However, multiple R2 is nondecreasing in the number of independent variables, so it is less reliable as a measure of goodness of fit in regression with more than one independent variable than in a one-independent variable regression.

C is incorrect. The adjusted \(\overline{R}^{2}\) can be negative if \(R^{2}\) is low enough. However, multiple \(R^{2}\) is always positive.

Reading 2: Multiple Regression

LOS 2 (h) Contrast and interpret the \(R^{2}\) and adjusted \(R^{2}\) in multiple regression.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.