Implementation Shortfall
The implementation shortfall approach involves taking the difference between the prevailing price and... Read More
It is usual for regulators to evaluate the cost-benefit of the regulatory suggestions. Such evaluation aims to determine the trade-offs related to regulatory action and suggest alternative solutions.
Regulators rely on economic principles when developing methods to measure a regulation’s costs and benefits. However, the cost-benefit analysis of the regulatory system is a bit challenging. In determining the cost-benefit analysis of regulation, it is easier to determine regulation cost.
Lastly, it is worth noting that determining the costs and benefits of regulation is a challenging feat when done prospectively rather than retrospectively. Making an informed decision via the retrospective method is relatively simple since before and after outcomes can be compared. Alternatively, a pilot study can be done to analyze the possible impact of a proposed regulation.
Question
Which of the following statements is most likely true about the cost-benefit analysis of regulation?
- Regulatory costs and benefits are easier to determine prospectively (after-the-fact basis).
- The net regulatory burden is the private cost of regulation plus the private benefits of regulation.
- Both statements are true.
Solution
The correct answer is A.
The actual costs and benefits can be comprehensively determined by carrying out a retrospective factual analysis, which allows for a concrete judgment to be made.
B is incorrect. The net regulatory burden is the private cost of regulation, less private benefits.
Reading 10: Economics of Regulation
LOS 10 (h) Describe benefits and costs of regulation