Capital Structure and Cost of Capital Relative to Peers

Capital Structure and Cost of Capital Relative to Peers

Jackie Zhao is an analyst at Momentum Capital. She has been tasked with evaluating Marigold’s WACC, a company the management is looking to acquire. Marigold operates in the agriculture sector, manufacturing farm equipment such as tractors and combined harvesters. She gathers information about Marigold and publicly traded agricultural equipment manufacturers presented in Exhibit 1.

$$ \textbf{Exhibit 1: Information on Marigold and Peer Companies} \\ \begin{array}{l|c|c} & \textbf{Marigold} & {\textbf{Agricultural Equipment} \\ \textbf{Manufacturers’ Average} } \\ \hline { \textbf{Commons Size} \\ \textbf{Balance sheet} } & & \\ \hline \text{Accounts receivables} & 9\% & 10\% \\ \hline \text{Inventory} & 5\% & 4\% \\ \hline \text{Cash and cash equivalents} & 12\% & 14\% \\ \hline \text{Other current assets} & 6\% & 5\% \\ \\ \text{PPE (net)} & 24\% & 26\% \\ \hline {\text{Goodwill and} \\ \text{intangible assets}} & 20\% & 29\% \\ \hline \text{Other assets} & 4\% & 4\% \\ \\ \textbf{Other Information} & & \\ \hline \text{Debt (millions)} & 20.4 & 312 \\ \hline \text{Assets (millions)} & 100 & 1376 \\ \hline \text{EBITDA (millions)} & 9.6 & 104 \\ \hline \text{Marginal tax rate} & 20\% & 22\% \\ \hline \text{Interest expense (millions)} & 1.3 & 24 \\ \hline \text{Beta} & N/A & 1.36 \end{array} $$

Notes:

  • 40% of the company’s revenue comes from spare part sales, and 6 customers in the same geographic location contribute 60% of revenues.
  • The company is family-owned, with the founder heavily involved in its operations.

Zhao relies on an internally developed synthetic bond yield schedule to estimate the company’s cost of debt.

$$ \textbf{Exhibit 2: Synthetic Credit Rating Schedule} \\ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} \textbf{Credit Rating} & \textbf{Credit Spread} & \textbf{IC} & \textbf{D/E} \\ \hline AAA & 0.7\% & IC > 10\text{times} & D/E < 15\% \\ \hline AA & 1.2\% & 9 < IC < 10 & 15\% < D/E < 20\% \\ \hline A & 1.5\% & 7 < IC < 9 & 20\% < D/E < 25\% \\ \hline BBB & 2.2\% & 5 < IC < 7 & 25\% < D/E < 30\% \\ \hline BB & 3\% & 4 < IC < 1.6 & 30\% < D/E < 40\% \end{array} $$

The YTM on a 10-year benchmark government bond for emerging market countries is 6%. Zhao estimates Marigold’s cost of debt by estimating a synthetic bond yield on the company’s 10-year non-traded bonds. Further, she uses the build-up approach and CAPM to estimate Marigold’s equity cost. Finally, Zhao assigns the following risk premiums

  • Size premium (SP): 7%.
  • Equity risk premium (ERP): 5%.
  • Industry premium (IP): 1%.
  • Specific-company risk premium (SCRP): 6%.
  • Country risk premium (CRP): 2%.

To estimate Marigold’s WACC, Zhao assumes Marigold’s current capital structure is its target capital structure.

Question

From the case above, Marigold’s cost of equity, using the expanded CAPM, is closest to:

  1. 27%.
  2. 24%.
  3. 6%.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

$$ \begin{align*} r_e &=r_f+\beta_{\text{peer}}\left(ERP\right)+SP+IP+SCRP \\ r_e & =6\%+1.36\left(5\%\right)+7\%+1\%+6\% \\ r_e &= 26.8\% \approx 27\% \end{align*} $$

B is incorrect. It uses the build-up approach.

$$ \begin{align*} r_e & =r_f+ERP+SP+SCRP \\ r_e & =6\%+5\%+7\%+6\% \\ r_e & =24\% \end{align*} $$

C is incorrect. This is the risk-free rate.

Reading 20: Cost of Capital: Advanced Topics

LOS 20 (f) Evaluate a company’s capital structure and cost of capital relative to peers.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.