# Calculating and Interpreting Measures of Dispersion

Measures of dispersion are used to describe the variability or spread in a sample or population. They are usually used in conjunction with measures of central tendency, such as the mean and the median. Specifically, measures of dispersion are the range, variance, absolute deviation, and standard deviation.

Measures of dispersion are important because they give us an idea of how well the measures of central tendency represent data. For example, if the standard deviation is large, then there are large differences between individual data points. Consequently, the mean may not be representative of the data.

## Range

Range is the difference between the highest and the lowest scores in a set of data, i.e.,

$$\text{Range} = \text{Maximum value} – \text{Minimum value}$$

#### Example: Calculating Range

Consider the following scores of 10 level I candidates:

{78   56   67   51   43   89   57   67   78   50}

$$\text{Range} = 89 – 43 = 46$$

• The range is easy to compute.

• The range may not be considered a reliable method of dispersion. Besides, it does not tell anything about the shape of the distribution because it is based on only two pieces of information from the distribution.
• The range is sensitive to outliers.

It is a measure of dispersion representing the average of the absolute values of the deviations of individual observations from the arithmetic mean. Therefore:

$$\text{MAD} =\frac { \sum { |{ X }_{ i }-\bar { X } | } }{ n }$$

Remember that the sum of deviations from the arithmetic means is always zero, and that is why we are using absolute values.

#### Example: Calculating Mean Absolute Deviation

Six financial analysts have reported the following returns on six different large-cap stocks over 2021:

{6%   7%   12%   2%   3%   11%}

Calculate the mean absolute deviation and interpret it.

Solution

First, we have to calculate the arithmetic mean:

$$X =\cfrac {(6\% +7\% +12\% +2\% +3\% +11\%)}{6} = 6.83\%$$

Next, we can now compute the MAD:

\begin{align*} \text{MAD} & = \cfrac {\left\{ |6\% – 6.83\%|+ |7\% – 6.83\%| + |12\% – 6.83\%| + |2\% – 6.83\%| + |3\% – 6.83\%| + |11\% – 6.83\%| \right\}} {6} \\ & =\cfrac {0.83+0.17+5.17+4.83+3.83+4.17}{6} \\ & = 3.17\% \\ \end{align*}

Interpretation: It means that, on average, an individual return deviates by 3.17% from the mean return of 6.83%.

## Population Variance and Population Standard Deviation

The population variance, denoted by $$σ^2$$, is the average of the squared deviations from the mean. Therefore:

$${ \sigma }^{ 2 }=\frac { \sum { { \left( { X }_{ i }-\mu \right) }^{ 2 } } }{ N }$$

And the standard deviation is simply the square root of variance.

#### Example: Variance and Standard Deviation

Working with data from the example above, the variance will be calculated as follows:

\begin{align*} { \sigma }^{ 2 } & =\frac { \left\{ { \left( 6\%-6.83 \%\right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 7\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 12\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 2\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 3\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 11\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 } \right\} }{ 6 } \\ & = 13.81(\%^2) \\ & = 0.001381 \\ \end{align*}

Therefore, the average variation from the mean of 0.12 is 0.001381.

The standard deviation is $$0.001381^{ 0.5 } = 0.0372$$ or $$3.72\%$$.

Analysts use the standard deviation to interpret returns instead of the variance since it is much easier to comprehend.

## Sample Variance and Sample Standard Deviation

The sample variance, $$S^2$$, is the dispersion measure that applies when we are working with a sample as opposed to a population.

$${ S }^{ 2 }=\frac { \left\{ \sum { { \left( { X }_{ i }- \bar { X } \right) }^{ 2 } } \right\} }{ n-1 }$$

Note that we are dividing by $$n – 1$$. This is necessary to remove bias.

The sample standard deviation, $$S$$, is simply the sample variance’s square root.

#### Example: Calculating Sample Mean and Variance

Assume that the returns realized in the previous example were sampled from a population comprising 100 returns. The sample mean and the corresponding sample variance is closest to:

Solution

The sample mean will still be 12%.

Hence,

\begin{align*} { \sigma }^{ 2 } & =\frac { \left\{ { \left( 6\%-6.83 \%\right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 7\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 12\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 2\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 3\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 11\%-6.83\% \right) }^{ 2 } \right\} }{ 5 } \\ & = 16.57(\%^2) \\ & = 0.001657 \\ \end{align*}

Therefore,

\begin{align*} S & = 0.001657^{\frac {1}{2}} \\ & = 0.0407 \end{align*}

## Question

You have been given the following data:

{12   13   54   56   25}

Assuming that this is complete data from a certain population, the population standard deviation is closest to:

A.  19.34.

B. 374.00.

C. 1,870.00.

$$\mu =\cfrac {(12 + 13 + \cdots +25)}{5} =\cfrac {160}{5} = 32$$

Hence,

\begin{align*} { \sigma }^{ 2 } & =\frac { \left\{ { \left( 12-32 \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 13-32 \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 54-32 \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 56-32 \right) }^{ 2 }+{ \left( 25-32 \right) }^{ 2 } \right\} }{ 5 } \\ & =\cfrac {1870}{5} = 374 \\ \end{align*}

Therefore,

$$\sigma =\sqrt{374} = 19.34$$

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep

Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.