Factors that Affect Sensitivity to Business Cycles

Factors that Affect Sensitivity to Business Cycles

Sensitivity Factors

A cyclical company is likely to experience wider-than-average fluctuations in demand, high demand in economic expansion, and low demand in economic contraction. It may be subject to greater-than-average profit variability related to high operating leverage. Non-cyclical companies produce goods or services for which demand remains relatively stable throughout the business cycle.

Uses of Company Descriptors

Describing a company as defensive or cyclical allows the investor to gain a basic understanding of how the company is expected to perform in various circumstances. The stock of a cyclical company will likely be more volatile than the stock of a non-cyclical company, so these definitions may help the investor in portfolio construction. These descriptions may also help put the historical performance into perspective as the strong performance of a cyclical business during a five-year economic boom may have little to do with how the company might perform in a recession.

Separating stocks into value or growth buckets doesn’t always seem intuitive, but it can be useful in understanding the investment approach of an actively managed fund. For example, an investor should take notice if an actively managed fund in their portfolio advertises that it aims to outperform its benchmark through investing in deep-value stocks but has mostly invested in stocks statistically classified as growth.

Limitations of Company Descriptors

One limitation of the cyclical/non-cyclical classification is that business-cycle sensitivity is a continuous spectrum rather than an “either/or” issue, so placement of companies into one of the two major groups is somewhat arbitrary. Another limitation is that different countries and regions of the world frequently progress through the various stages of the business cycle at different times.

Groupings by statistical similarities also tend to be somewhat arbitrary, and the composition of groups may vary significantly across time periods and world regions. Also, there is no guarantee that past correlation values will continue in the future. Finally, all statistical methods are at risk of falsely finding relationships that don’t actually exist or of excluding a relationship that actually is significant.

Question

Which of the following is least likely a common use of company descriptors?

  1. Determining stocks that will perform similarly in the future.
  2. Understanding a fund manager’s general investment approach.
  3. Determining which companies may experience a significant decline in earnings in the event of a recession.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

While statistical analysis groups companies based on past performance similarities, it is not very useful in determining future performance.

B is incorrect. A statistical similarities grouping is likely to help an investor break down a fund manager’s holdings to understand their general approach.

C is incorrect. The business-cycle sensitivities classification is likely to help an investor develop an idea of which companies are more protected from recessions and which companies are not.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.