Heteroskedasticity and Serial Correlat ...
One of the assumptions underpinning multiple regression is that regression errors are homoscedastic.... Read More
The residual income model is appropriate when:
The residual income model is least appropriate when:
The residual income model, just like the discounted dividend and free cash flow models, can also be used to compute justified market multiples, such as the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) or price-to-book ratio (P/B).
The residual income model can also be used together with other models to evaluate the consistency of results. If a wide variation of computed value is observed and each model appears appropriate, the inconsistency may be due to the assumptions used in the models.
Question
The residual income approach is most appropriate when:
- determinants of residual income like book value and ROE are not predictable.
- there is a significant degree of doubt in forecasting terminal values.
- clean surplus accounting holds.
Solution
The correct answer is B.
When there is a significant degree of doubt in forecasting terminal values, it would be most appropriate to use the residual income approach because the terminal value does not constitute a large portion of the intrinsic value.
A is incorrect. When determinants of residual income like book value and ROE are not predictable, the residual income approach would not be appropriate because these two are significant components of the residual income model.
C is incorrect. The residual income approach is appropriate when clean surplus holds, i.e., when all items that affect the book value of equity are included in earnings and flow in the income statement. If this is not the case, an analyst would be required to adjust or use a different valuation model of adjustments if they cannot adjust.
Reading 26: Residual Income Valuation
LOS 26 (j) Explain strengths and weaknesses of residual income models and justify the selection of a residual income model to value a company’s common stock.