Limited Time Offer: Save 10% on all 2021 and 2022 Premium Study Packages with promo code: BLOG10    Select your Premium Package »

Benefits and Costs of Regulation

Benefits and Costs of Regulation

It is a usual practice for the regulators to evaluate the cost-benefit of the regulatory suggestions to determine the trade-offs related to regulatory action and suggest alternative solutions. The economic principles guide the regulators in developing methods to improve the measurement of the cost and the benefits of the regulation. However, the cost-benefit analysis of the regulatory system is a bit challenging. In determining the cost-benefit analysis of regulation, it is easier to determine the cost of regulation.

Costs of Regulation

  1. Regulatory burden (also called private or government burden). These are the costs of regulation for the regulated party
  2. Net regulatory burden. These are the private costs of regulation less the private benefits of regulation.
  3. Implementation costs of regulation. An example is the cost incurred in hiring compliance lawyers.
  4. Indirect costs. These are the costs associated with how the economic decisions and actions are changed and varying the market allocations.
  5. Unintended cost. These costs can be divided into the implementation and indirect costs that were not forecasted.

Lastly, it is worth noting that determining the costs and benefits of regulation is a challenging feat when done prospectively compared to the retrospective way. The retrospective method is easy since the before and after the outcome of the regulations are compared, and an informed decision is made. Alternatively, a pilot study can be done to analyze the possible impact of a proposed regulation.


Which of the following statements is most likely to be true about the cost-benefit analysis of regulation?

  1. Regulatory costs and benefits are easier to determine prospectively (after-the-fact basis)
  2. The net regulatory burden is private costs of the regulation plus the private benefits of regulation
  3. Both statements are true


The correct answer is A.

The actual costs and benefits can be comprehensively determined by carrying out a retrospective factual analysis, which allows for a concrete judgment to be made.

Option B is incorrect since the net regulatory burden is the private cost of regulation less private benefits of regulation.

Reading 8: Economics of Regulation

LOS 8 (h) Describe benefits and costs of regulation

Featured Study with Us
CFA® Exam and FRM® Exam Prep Platform offered by AnalystPrep

Study Platform

Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Online Tutoring
    Our videos feature professional educators presenting in-depth explanations of all topics introduced in the curriculum.

    Video Lessons

    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.