Study Notes for CFA® Level III – Ca ...
Reading 1: Capital Market Expectations – Part 1 (Framework and Macro Considerations) Los... Read More
Capture and drawdown ratios aid clients in evaluating a manager's suitability. For instance, a retiree seeking a safe and conservative investment manager may prefer avoiding those with frequent, substantial drawdowns. In contrast, a young, risk-seeking investor might be more tolerant of these drawdowns if they offer the potential for higher returns.
We'll discuss how to interpret these ratios in the following section of this reading. When calculated correctly, they provide valuable insights into the investment manager selection process.
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Profile} & \textbf{UC} & \textbf{DC} & \textbf{CR} \\ \hline
\text{Long Only} & 100\% & 100\% & 1.0 \\ \hline
\text{Positive asymmetry Portfolio} & 75\% & 25\% & 3.0
\end{array} $$
In the table above, we see the use of the capture ratio. The long-only portfolio is entirely invested in FTSE 100 equities. The positive asymmetry portfolio, however, allocates 80% to FTSE 100 equities during strong market periods and 20% during weak ones. The remaining portion is in low-yielding AAA corporate bonds.
The long-only portfolio, by design, mirrors 100% of the stock index's ups and downs, resulting in a capture ratio of 1.0. In contrast, the positive asymmetry portfolio benefits from market timing and asset class allocation, capturing 75% of the FTSE's gains and only 25% of its losses, yielding a capture ratio of 3.0.
Opting for a low-beta portfolio to limit drawdowns can be advantageous. While no portfolio can surpass the positive asymmetry portfolio in terms of performance, a low-beta portfolio, due to the geometric nature of returns, might even outperform the long-only portfolio, albeit with lower returns.
Drawdowns serve as stress tests for the investment process, revealing potential flaws, inadequate risk controls, or operational issues. A manager's response to significant drawdowns and the lessons learned provide insights into the robustness of the investment, portfolio construction, and risk management processes, as well as the effectiveness of those implementing the investment system.
Active share measures the difference in portfolio holdings relative to the benchmark. A manager that precisely replicates the benchmark will have an active share of zero; a manager with no holdings in common with the benchmark will have an active share of one.
$$
\text{Active Share} =\frac {1}{2} \sum {|\text{Strategy weight} – \text{benchmark weight}|} $$
Active share is related to tracking risk, and can be used in conjunction with many of the previously mentioned drawdown and capture ratios. The following table demonstrates the effects of combining certain degrees of active share and tracking risk and the portrait of the manager, which is subsequently painted.
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|cc}
& & \textbf{Active Share} & \\ \hline
& & \textbf{Lo} & \textbf{Hi} \\ \hline
\textbf{Tracking} &\text{Hi} & \text{Sector Rotator} & \text{Concentrated stock picker} \\
\textbf{risk} & \text{Lo} & \text{Closet indexer} & \text{Diversified stock picker}
\end{array} $$
Question
A manager with a high active share and high tracking risk is mostly appropriately classified as a?
- Diversified stock picker.
- Concentrated stock picker.
- Sector rotator.
Solution
The correct answer is B.
A manager with a high active share and high tracking risk is most appropriately classified as a “concentrated stock picker.” This manager is actively selecting a relatively small number of stocks that differ significantly from the benchmark index. Their portfolio will have a high tracking risk because it doesn't closely track the benchmark, and a high active share because they are making distinct, concentrated bets on a limited number of stocks.
A is incorrect. A manager with a high active share and high tracking risk is not accurately classified as a “diversified stock picker.” Diversified stock pickers typically aim to create portfolios that closely resemble a benchmark index, meaning they have low active share and low tracking risk. They seek to mimic the overall market or index rather than deviating from it significantly.
C is incorrect. A sector rotator is a type of manager who frequently changes their portfolio allocations among different sectors or industries. This may or may not be related to their active share or tracking risk. The terms “sector rotator” and “concentrated stock picker” refer to different aspects of portfolio management.
Reading 13: Investment Manager Selection
Los 13 (d) Describe uses of the upside capture ratio, downside capture ratio, maximum drawdown, drawdown duration, and up/down capture in evaluating managers