Limited Time Offer: Save 10% on all 2021 and 2022 Premium Study Packages with promo code: BLOG10    Select your Premium Package » Test Statistic, Type I and Type II Errors, Power of a Test, and Significance Levels

A test statistic is a standardized value computed from sample information when testing hypotheses. It compares the given data with what an analyst would expect under a null hypothesis. As such, it is a major determinant of the decision to either accept or reject H0, the null hypothesis.

We use test statistic to gauge the degree of agreement between sample data and the null hypothesis. Analysts use the following formula when calculating the test statistic.

$$\text{Test statistic} = \cfrac { (\text{Sample statistic} – \text{Hypothesized value})}{\text{Standard error of the sample statistic}}$$

The test statistic is a random variable that changes from one sample to another. The following table  gives a brief outline of the various test statistics used regularly, based on the distribution the data presumably follows:

$$\begin{array}{c|c} \textbf{Hypothesis Test} & \textbf{Test statistic} \\ \hline \text{Z-test} & \text{Z-statistic (normal distribution)} \\ \hline \text{Chi-square test} & \text{Chi-square statistic} \\ \hline \text{t-test} & \text{t-statistic} \\ \hline \text{ANOVA} & \text{F-statistic} \\ \end{array}$$

We can subdivide the set of values that the test statistic can take into two regions: The non-rejection region, which is consistent with the H0, and the rejection region (critical region), which is inconsistent with the H0. If the test statistic has a value found within the critical region, we reject the H0.

As is the case with any other statistic, the distribution of the test statistic must be completely specified under the H0 when the H0 is true.

The following is the list of test statistics and their distributions:

$$\begin{array} {c|c|c|c} {}&{}&\textbf{Test Statistic}&\textbf{Number of Degrees of}\\ \textbf{Test Subject}&\textbf{Test Statistic Formula}&\textbf{Distribution}&\textbf{Freedom}\\ \hline \text{Single mean }&t=\frac{\bar{X}-\mu_{0}}{\frac{s }{\sqrt{n}}}&\text{t-distribution}&n-1\\ \hline \text{Difference in means}&t=\frac{\left(\bar{X}_{1}-\bar{X}_{2}\right)-\left(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)}{\sqrt{\frac{s_{p}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s_{p}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}&\text{t-Distribution}&n_1+n_2-2\\ \hline \text{Mean of differences}&t=\frac{\bar{d}-\mu_{d 0}}{s_{\bar{d}}}&\text{t-Distribution}&n-1\\ \hline \text{Single variance}&\chi^{2}=\frac{s^{2}(n-1)}{\sigma_{0}^{2}}&\text{Chi-square distribution}&n-1\\ \hline \text{Differences in variances}&F=\frac{s_{1}^{2}}{s_{2}^{2}} &\text{F-distribution}&n_1-1, n_2-1\\ \hline \text{Correlation}&t=\frac{r \sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^{2}}}&\text{t-Distribution}&n-2\\ \hline \text{Independence (categorical data)}&\chi^{2}=\sum_{i=1}^{m} \frac{\left(O_{i j}-E_{i j}\right)^{2}}{E_{i j}}& \text{Chi-square distribution}&(r-1)(c-1)\\ \end{array}$$

Where:

$$\mu_o, \mu_{d_0}$$ and $$\sigma^2_0$$ denote hypothesized values of the  mean, mean difference, and variance, in that order.

$$\bar{x}, \bar{d}, s^2, s$$ and $$r$$ denote sample mean of the differences, sample variance, sample standard deviation, and correlation, in that order.

$$O_{ij}$$ and $$E_ij$$ are observed and expected frequencies, respectively, with r indicating the number of rows and c indicating the number of columns in the contingency table.

Type I and Type II Errors

While using sample statistics to draw conclusions about the parameters of an entire population, there is always the possibility that the sample collected does not accurately represent the population. Consequently, statistical tests carried out using such sample data may yield incorrect results that may lead to erroneous rejection (or lack thereof) of the null hypothesis. This brings us to the two errors highlighted below.

Type I Error

Type I error occurs when we reject a true null hypothesis. For example, a type I error would manifest in the rejection of H0 = 0 when it is actually zero.

Type II Error

Type II error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. In such a scenario, the evidence the test provides is insufficient and, as such, cannot justify the rejection of the null hypothesis, when it is actually false.

The level of significance, denoted by α, represents the probability of making a type I error, i.e., rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Consequently, β, the direct opposite of α, is the probability of making a type II error within the bounds of statistical testing. The ideal but practically impossible statistical test would be one that simultaneously minimizes α and β. We use α to determine critical values that subdivide a distribution into the rejection and the non-rejection regions. The figure below gives an example of the critical regions under a two-tailed normal distribution and 5% significance level: The Power of a Test

The power of a test is the direct opposite of the level of significance. While the level of significance gives us the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, true, the power of a test gives us the probability of correctly discrediting and rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false. In other words, it gives the likelihood of rejecting $$H_0$$ when, indeed, it is false. Expressed mathematically,

$$\text{Power of a test = 1- β = 1-P(type II error)}$$

When presented with a situation where there are multiple test results for the same purpose, it is the test with the highest power that is considered the best.

Featured Study with Us CFA® Exam and FRM® Exam Prep Platform offered by AnalystPrep

Study Platform

Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Online Tutoring Our videos feature professional educators presenting in-depth explanations of all topics introduced in the curriculum.

Video Lessons Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar. diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings. Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep. nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures. Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way! michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.