Save 30% on all 2023 Study Packages with Code: BLACKFRIDAY30. Valid until Nov. 28th.

Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Tests

Parametric vs. Non-Parametric Tests

Parametric Tests

Parametric tests are statistical tests in which we make assumptions regarding population distribution. Such tests involve the estimation of the key parameters of a distribution. For example, we may wish to estimate the mean or compare population proportions.

Breaking Down Parametric Tests

When carrying out statistical tests, assuming the parameter follows a specific distribution, the distribution chosen directly affects the formulation of the test statistic. For instance, if we assume that a parameter follows a normal distribution, we have to compute the z-statistic.

When conducting parametric testing, it may be necessary to approximate the normal distribution for non-normal distributions. This approximation is possible because of the central limit theorem, which asserts that as the sample size increases, most non-normal distributions “tend to normalize.”

Parametric tests are generally considered to be stronger compared to non-parametric ones.

Non-Parametric Tests

Non-parametric tests – also called distribution-free tests by some researchers – are tests that do not make any assumption regarding the distribution of the parameter under study. Researchers use non-parametric testing when there are concerns about some quantities other than the parameter of the distribution.

Situations Where Non-Parametric Tests are Appropriate

When the Median is More Desirable Compared to the Mean

You can conduct a parametric test using non-normal data courtesy of the central limit theorem. There are situations, however, where the mean may not provide a fair measure of the central tendency, i.e., when there are large outliers.

Example: Large Outliers

Consider a situation where we want to establish the center of a rather skewed distribution such as that of the income of the residents of a given city. While majority of the residents could be categorized as the middle class, the presence of just a few billionaires in a sample can greatly increase the mean income. Such a mean, therefore, may not provide a very reliable or realistic measure of income.

Instead, it may be more appropriate to use the median. Compared to the mean, the median can give a better representation of the center of the income distribution. This is due to the fact that 50% of the residents will be above median and the remaining 50%, below it.

In a summary, “outliers” affect the mean when dealing with skewed data. The median, on the other hand, sticks closer to the center of the distribution.

When the Sample Size is Very Small

The absence of outright normal distribution of data might leave an analyst with insufficient information or too small a sample size to justify normal approximation. In the end, the analyst might not even successfully carry out distribution tests such as the goodness-of-fit test. In such a scenario, a non-parametric test may be appropriate.

Analysis of Ordinal Data

Although non-parametric tests are usually easier to conduct than parametric ones, they do not have as much statistical power. Nonetheless, they provide an efficient tool for analyzing ordinal, ranked, or very skewed data.


Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.