One-tailed vs. Two-tailed Hypothesis Testing

One-tailed vs. Two-tailed Hypothesis Testing

A one-tailed test (one-sided test) is a statistical test that considers a change in only one direction. In such a test, the alternative hypothesis either has a < (less than sign) or > (greater than sign), i.e., we consider either an increase or reduction, but not both.

Breaking Down a One-tailed Test

A one-tailed test directs all the significance level (α) to the testing of statistical significance in one direction. In other words, we aim at testing the possibility of a change in one direction and completely disregard the possibility of a change in the other direction.

If we have a 5% significance level, we shall allot 0.05 of the total area in one tail of the distribution of our test statistic.

Examples: Hypothesis Testing

Let us assume that we are using the standardized normal distribution to test the hypothesis that the population mean is equal to a given value X.  Further, let us assume that we are using data from a sample drawn from the population of interest. Our null hypothesis can be expressed as:

$$ H_0: \ \mu = X $$

If our test is one-tailed, the alternative hypothesis will test if the mean is either significantly greater than X or significantly less than X, but NOT both.

Case 1: At the 95% Confidence Level

$$ H_1: \ \mu < X $$

The mean is significantly less than X if the test statistic is in the bottom 5% of the probability distribution. This bottom area is known as the critical region (rejection region). We will reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic is less than -1.645.


Case 2: Still at the 95% Confidence Level

$$ H_1: \  \mu > X $$

We would reject the null hypothesis only if the test statistic is greater than the upper 5% point of the distribution. In other words, we would reject H0 if the test statistic is greater than 1.645.

A Two-tailed Test

A two-tailed test considers the possibility of a change in either direction. It looks for a statistical relationship in both the positive and negative directions of a distribution. Therefore, it allows half the value of α to test statistical significance in one direction and the other half to test the same in the opposite direction. A two-tailed test may have the following set of hypotheses:

$$ H_0: \mu = X $$

$$ H_1: \mu \neq X $$

Refer to our earlier example. If we were to carry out a two-tailed test, we would reject H0 if the test statistic turned out to be less than the lower 2.5% point or greater than the upper 2.5% point of the normal distribution.


Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep

    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.