Kurtosis and Skewness

Kurtosis and Skewness

Kurtosis refers to measuring the degree to which a given distribution is more or less ‘peaked’ relative to the normal distribution. The concept of kurtosis is very useful in decision-making.  In this regard, we have 3 categories of distributions:

  1. Leptokurtic
  2. Mesokurtic
  3. Platykurtic

Image showing Kurtosis graph

Leptokurtic

A leptokurtic distribution is more peaked than the normal distribution. The higher peak results from the clustering of data points along the X-axis. The tails are also fatter than those of a normal distribution. The coefficient of kurtosis is usually found to be more than 3.

The term “laptop” means thin or skinny. When analyzing historical returns, a leptokurtic distribution means that small changes are less frequent since historical values are clustered around the mean. However, there are also large fluctuations represented by the fat tails.

Platykurtic

A platykurtic distribution has extremely dispersed points along the X-axis, resulting in a lower peak when compared to the normal distribution. “Platy” means broad. Hence, the prefix fits the distribution’s shape, which is wide and flat. The points are less clustered around the mean compared to the leptokurtic distribution. The coefficient of kurtosis is usually less than 3.

Returns that follow this type of distribution have fewer major fluctuations compared to leptokurtic returns. However, you should note that fluctuations represent the riskiness of an asset. More fluctuations represent more risk and vice versa. Therefore, platykurtic returns are less risky than leptokurtic returns.

Mesokurtic

Lastly, mesokurtic distributions have a curve that’s similar to that of the normal distribution. In other words, the distribution is largely normal.

Measures of Sample Skewness and Kurtosis

Exam tip: The learning outcome statement reads, explain measures of sample skewness and kurtosis.” However, the calculations will have you better understand those concepts.

Sample skewness

\({ S }_{ k }=\frac { 1 }{ n } \frac { \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ { \left( { X }_{ i }-\bar { X } \right) }^{ 3 } } }{ { S }^{ 3 } } \)

Where: \(\bar { X }\) is the sample mean;

S is the sample standard deviation; and

n is the number of observations.

Note: the numerator is raised to the third power, and as such, it can either be positive or negative. However, the denominator (s3) is always positive.

Interpretation: A positive value indicates positive skewness. A ‘zero’ value indicates the data is not skewed. Lastly, a negative value indicates negative skewness or rather a negatively skewed distribution.

Sample Kurtosis

Sample kurtosis is always measured relative to the kurtosis of a normal distribution, which is 3. Therefore, we are always interested in the “excess“ kurtosis, i.e.,

Excess kurtosis = sample kurtosis – 3, where:

\({ S }_{ kr }=\frac { 1 }{ n } \frac { \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ { \left( { X }_{ i }-\bar { X } \right) }^{ 4 } } }{ { S }^{ 4 } } \)

Interpretation: A positive excess kurtosis indicates a leptokurtic distribution. A zero value indicates a mesokurtic distribution. Lastly, a negative excess kurtosis represents a platykurtic distribution.

Example

Suppose we have the following observations:

{12   13   54   56   25}

Determine the skewness of the data.

Solution

First, we must determine the sample mean and the sample standard deviation:

$$ X =\cfrac {(12 + 13 +…+25)}{5} =\cfrac {160}{5} = 32 $$

$$ S^2= \cfrac{{(12 – 32)^2 + …+ (25 – 32)^2}}{4} = 467.5 $$

Therefore,

$$ S = 467.5^{\frac{1}{2}} = 21.62 $$

Now we can work out the skewness:

\({ S }_{ k }=\frac { 1 }{ n } \frac { \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ { \left( { X }_{ i }-\bar { X } \right) }^{ 3 } } }{ { S }^{ 3 } } =\frac { 1 }{ 5 } \frac { { -20 }^{ 3 }+{ (-19 }^{ 3 })+{ 22 }^{ 3 }+{ 24 }^{ 3 }+{ (-7 }^{ 3 }) }{ { 21.62 }^{ 3 } } =0.1835 \)

Skewness is positive. Hence, the data has a positively skewed distribution.

Question

Using the data from the example above (12  13  54  56  25), determine the type of kurtosis present.

A. Mesokurtic distribution

B. Platykurtic distribution

C. Leptokurtic distribution

Solution

The correct answer is B.

$$ X =\cfrac {(12 + 13 +…+25)}{5} =\cfrac {160}{5} = 32 $$

$$ S^2=\cfrac {{(12 – 32)^2 + …+ (25 – 32)^2}}{4} = 467.5 $$

Therefore,

$$ S = 467.5^{\frac{1}{2}} = 21.62 $$

\({ S }_{ kr }=\frac { 1 }{ n } \frac { \sum _{ i=1 }^{ n }{ { \left( { X }_{ i }-\bar { X } \right) }^{ 4 } } }{ { S }^{ 4 } } =\frac { 1 }{ 5 } \frac { { -20 }^{ 4 }+{ (-19 }^{ 4 })+{ 22 }^{ 4 }+{ 24 }^{ 4 }+{ (-7 }^{ 4 }) }{ { 21.62 }^{ 4 } } =0.7861\)

Next, we subtract 3 from the sample kurtosis and get the excess kurtosis.

Thus,\(\text {excess kurtosis} = 0.7861 – 3 = -2.2139\)

Since the excess kurtosis is negative, we have a platykurtic distribution.


Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.