Risk and Return Objectives

Risk and Return Objectives

The investment objectives and investment constraints are arguably the key components of the IPS. The two elements outline the risk and return objectives. Return objectives and expectations must be consistent with the risk objectives and constraints that apply to a portfolio.

Risk Objectives

The IPS should clearly state a client’s risk tolerance. Risk objectives are the specifications for portfolio risk and can be stated as absolute or relative measures using quantitative metrics. Absolute metrics may be around the probability of loss of portfolio capital over a particular time frame, whereas relative risk objectives would key off a particular benchmark, such as the S&P 500 or LIBOR, to measure risk. For institutional clients, the benchmark may be linked to some kind of liability the institution has. For instance, a pension plan must be able to meet its payment obligations when they are due. When a policy portfolio has been specified, the risk objective may be for the portfolio to remain within a certain bandwidth around that policy allocation.

A client’s overall risk tolerance is a function of their ability to bear risk and their willingness to take on risk. When there is consistency between risk willingness and ability, the investment task is made easier. Where the two are in conflict, the advisor should seek to explain the conflict and its implications. However, they should not aim to try and change the client’s willingness to take a risk if the decision is not a result of misperception. The prudent approach is to reach a conclusion about risk tolerance that is the lower of the two factors – ability and willingness.

Return Objectives

Return objectives may be stated on an absolute or relative basis. An absolute return objective may state the desired returns in nominal or real terms while a relative return objective could be an outperformance, relative to an index or even a peer group. However, a good benchmark should be investable and have the capacity to make return objectives relative to peers or other managers and institutions less appropriate.

The return objective should be clearly classified either as before or after fees and pre or post-tax. The return objective must be consistent with the client’s risk objective and appropriate with respect to the market and economic environment.

Question

Which of the following best demonstrates an absolute risk objective and a relative return objective?

A. Target a maximum annual portfolio volatility of 1.5x the S&P 500 and returns of ±4% of the S&P 500 annual return.

B. Target a maximum portfolio drawdown of 10% with 95% confidence and annual returns of 12%.

C. Target a maximum portfolio loss of $100 000 with 95% confidence and annual returns within 2% of the MSCI World Index.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

An absolute objective does not key off a benchmark or index whereas a relative objective is with respect to a benchmark, index or peer group.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.