Categories of Valuation Model

Categories of Valuation Model

Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) Model

  • Advantages: aims to calculate a company’s capacity to pay future dividends, going beyond simply discounting expected dividends. This approach may provide a more useful valuation, especially when the company does not pay dividends or dividends are sporadic.
  • Disadvantages: calculation is more complicated than a standard dividend discount model, and more assumptions must be made.

Gordon (Constant) Growth Dividend Discount Model

  • Advantages: useful in valuing defensive companies at a mature life-cycle stage. The calculation is intuitive and simple.
  • Disadvantages: while a single growth rate makes the calculation easy, it isn’t always very practical for valuing complex companies in uncertain economic environments.

Multistage Dividend Discount Model

  • Advantages: allows for more flexibility than the constant growth model as an analyst can include however many growth rates may be appropriate for a given company’s valuation. This is particularly useful in the valuation of companies at an early stage in their life-cycle.
  • Disadvantages: calculation isn’t as clean and simple as the constant growth model. While the model allows for flexibility, it is oftentimes difficult to project multiple separate growth rates in a company’s future.

Multiplier Models

  • Advantages: can take comparable companies into account and may prove particularly useful in valuing companies with negative earnings. Limits the amount of projection necessary and ties the valuation into historical data. Price multiples have shown to be fairly good predictors of future performance.
  • Disadvantages: a comparable company analysis may be skewed by mispricing across the given industry or peer group.

Asset-Based Valuation Models

  • Advantages: simple calculation and no projections necessary, particularly useful in valuing firms that are heavy in current assets and light in intangibles. Also useful in supplementing other valuation methods.
  • Disadvantages: not usually the best stand-alone option for valuing firms as going concerns. The model doesn’t take into account current or expected cash flows, earnings, or growth rates.


Which of the following models would be the most helpful in valuing a Sillicon Valley startup firm?

  1. Multiplier model.
  2. Asset-based model.
  3. Multistage dividend discount model.


The correct answer is A.

Multiplier models are particularly useful in valuing companies with negative earnings, which is often the case for startup companies. Also, there should be many comparable startups in the same geographical location raising capital, which makes the valuation easier.

B is incorrect. A startup firm usually does not have many tangible assets.

C is incorrect. While the multistage dividend discount model can include different growth rates, a startup company is rarely paying dividends. Therefore, this model would not be of any help.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep

    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.