Corporate Stakeholders

Corporate Stakeholders

A stakeholder is any individual or entity with a significant interest in a company. Corporations have a complex ecosystem that includes not only the shareholders but also other stakeholders. These groups mutually relate with the company for economic success.

However, the short- and long-term objectives of these conflicts may conflict.

Shareholder and Stakeholder Theories

Corporate governance practices tend to vary from country to country. However, it is not uncommon for different corporate governance systems to coexist within a country. Corporate governance systems generally reflect the influences of either shareholder theory or stakeholder theory or a convergence of the two. Current trends, however, point to an increase in convergence.

Shareholder theory posits that a company’s management’s most critical responsibility is to maximize shareholder returns. In other words, the interests of other stakeholders, such as creditors, employees, and society, are only considered if they affect shareholder value.

On the other hand, stakeholder theory emphasizes the need for a company to consider the needs of all its stakeholders. This theory dissuades a company from giving preferential treatment to its shareholders, at the expense of stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, creditors, employees, and essentially anyone interested in the company.

Consideration of ESG factors by the stakeholder theory comes with some setbacks:

  • Complexity in considering multiple objectives.
  • Costs associated with compliance with ESG.
  • Difficulty in competing globally with companies that do not consider ESG.
  • There is no clarity in the definition, measurement, and balancing of non-shareholder objectives.

Stakeholder Groups

Investors

The investors of a company include the bondholders and the shareholders.

The debtholders provide the company with debt financing. The debtholders consist of private debtholders and public debtholders (bondholders).

Private Debtholders

Private debtholders include banks, credit facilities, and institutions that provide loans and leases. They hold a company’s debt until maturity. Further, they can directly reach a company’s management and access non-public information concerning a company. As such, they significantly influence a company since they can be the largest source of capital. Therefore, they can lower debt restrictions and extend more credit.

Public Debtholders

On the other hand, public debtholders, including institutional investors and asset managers, depend on public information and credit rating agencies in their decision-making. In return for the capital provided, public debtholders receive regular interest payments and capital repayment at maturity.

Furthermore, public bondholders have minimal to no control over the issuing company’s operations and, therefore, depend on the terms outlined in the debt contract. However, they can play a significant role when the company faces financial distress, especially if the public debt needs to be restructured.

Public debtholders minimize downside risk thanks to their preference for operation stability and a company’s performance. This is usually in contrast to a company’s shareholders’ interests – tolerance of high risk for higher return potential.
Debtholders generally share the same perspective: lower financial leverage means lower risk. However, some private lenders may have varying risk appetites, behaviors, approaches, and relationships with the companies they finance. These lenders might focus on asset value, equity positions, cash flows, and business forecasts.

Managers

Led by the chief executive officer (CEO), managers are tasked to formulate and implement a company’s strategy. They do this under the stewardship of the board of directors. Additionally, they ensure the smooth running of a corporation’s day-to-day operations.

Managers tend to benefit when a company performs well. Conversely, they are adversely affected when a company’s financial position weakens. As such, they seek to maximize the value of their total remuneration while securing their jobs. Their interests are, therefore, not surprisingly different from those of shareholders, creditors, and other stakeholders.

The Board of Directors

The shareholders of a company elect the board of directors. It protects shareholders’ interests, provides strategic direction, and monitors company and management performance. Also, the board hires the CEO of the company.

The board usually consists of inside directors and independent directors. The inside directors comprise the company’s leading shareholders, founders, and senior managers. On the other hand, independent directors, as the name suggests, are not linked with the company concerning employment, ownership, and remuneration. As such, independent directors are elected because of their experience.

Types of Board Structures

The board can have a single-tier or two-tier structure. In a single-tier board, the company’s board of directors includes executive directors (usually company executives) and non-executive directors (independent members without day-to-day involvement in company operations).

On the other hand, a two-tier board structure is a corporate governance model where a company’s board of directors is divided into two separate boards: the management board and the supervisory board:

  1. Management Board: The management board is responsible for the company’s day-to-day operations and strategic management. It typically consists of executive directors who are actively involved in running the company and making operational decisions.
  2. Supervisory Board: The supervisory board oversees the management board and ensures it acts in the best interests of the company and its stakeholders. It usually comprises non-executive directors (often independent individuals) who are not directly involved in daily operations. The supervisory board’s primary role is to provide guidance, monitor performance, and approve major decisions made by the management board.

Staggered Boards

Some companies have staggered boards. In these companies, directors are divided into groups and elected separately in consecutive years, resulting in a staggered rotation of board members. This approach creates a situation where it takes several years to replace the entire board.

The advantage of staggered boards is the continuity they provide to a company’s leadership. By preventing the simultaneous turnover of board members, there is a less frequent need for new directors to reassess strategy and oversight.

The downside of staggered boards is that they limit the ability of shareholders to effect a swift and major change of control at the company. With only a portion of the board up for re-election each year, shareholders may find it challenging to influence the board’s overall composition and direction on time.

An optimal board of directors does not exist. As such, boards vary based on the company’s size, structure, and type of operations. However, most governance codes stipulate that board members should reflect different expertise, backgrounds, and competencies.

Employees

A company relies on the knowledge and labor of its employees, or human capital, to deliver its goods and services. In return, workers often want competitive pay, room for advancement, steady employment, and a safe and comfortable work environment. Employees’ interests are better aligned with the company’s performance when they have the option to participate in equity-based incentive schemes in addition to their duties as employees.

Customers

Customers expect a company to satisfy their needs and give them the necessary benefits when they purchase its goods or services. Customers may receive continuous support, product guarantees, and after-sale service, depending on the products and services a company deals in.

Suppliers

Suppliers are the short-term creditors of a company whose main interest is to be paid as agreed for products or services delivered. Suppliers are interested in a company’s financial health and seek long-term relationships with it for mutual benefits.

Governments

Governments and regulators seek to ensure that companies comply with the law and act in a manner that safeguards the public’s interests and well-being. Moreover, governments collect taxes from companies.

Question

Which one of the following is least likely considered a primary function of the board of directors?

  1. Managing day-to-day operations of the company.
  2. Approving major corporate strategies and transactions.
  3. Overseeing the implementation of broad corporate policies.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

The board of directors is responsible for the governance of a company, including providing strategic direction and overseeing operations at a high level. However, it typically does not manage day-to-day operations.

That role is generally assigned to the company’s executive management team, led by the CEO or managing director. The board’s functions include overseeing the implementation of broad corporate policies and approving major strategies and transactions, ensuring that the company aligns with the goals and policies set forth for its successful operation.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.