Legal, Regulatory, and Tax Constraints

Legal, Regulatory, and Tax Constraints

It is important for financial institutions to be highly regulated because they have a direct impact on the non-financial sector of the economy. As a result, when large financial institutions fail, it can ripple through the economy, causing unemployment, lack of funds, or inability to make pension payments.

An institution's capital must be sufficient to absorb shocks to both asset and liability values. This implies limiting the volatility of the value of the institution's portfolio of shareholder capital. Since these factors vary by jurisdiction, no specific set of constraints is testable. What may be testable is the goals, methods, and commonalities among these constraints within each jurisdiction, in other words, the high-level aspects.

Pension Funds

Legal and Regulatory

Pension funds regulations commonly cover the following aspects of a pension fund operations, including:

  • Financial services licensing and regulation – pensions must be registered and licensed, meaning they must be managed by individuals who are properly vetted and permitted to do what they do legally.
  • Prudential supervision – similar to the above, pension funds must often be monitored to ensure they operate not only within the letter of the law but also within the spirit of the law.
  • Capital adequacy – this often takes the form of minimal cash requirements and certain restrictions on asset allocations to riskier investments.
  • Market integrity – administrators of a pension fund are monitored to ensure they are not manipulating other investors, usually by leveraging their size or negotiating power.
  • Consumer protection – these regulations pertain to aspects of honesty in advertising and following through with the promised obligations. An example of this could be the transparency of fees.

Failure to comply with key regulations may result in loss of operating licenses and/or loss of tax benefits, where applicable, which provides a strong incentive to comply. As an example, US corporate pension plans are subject to significant regulatory oversight. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) regulates vesting, funding requirements, and payouts.

Tax Constraints

Most governments around the world provide favorable tax treatment for retirement savings. Different forms of favorable tax treatment may apply. Here are a few examples: reduced taxes on retirement plan contributions, favorable tax rates on investment income and/or capital gains, and lower tax rates on benefit payments during retirement. Governments typically place restrictions on plan design, governance, and investment activities in order for plans to qualify for the favorable tax treatment

Sovereign Wealth Funds

Legal and Regulatory

National legislation typically establishes sovereign wealth funds, which include details on:

  • The fund's mission.
  • Contributions.
  • Allowing withdrawals from the fund.
  • Governance structure.

Tax

Typically, sovereign wealth funds are given tax-free status by the legislation that governs them. SWFs may be ineligible to claim withholding taxes or tax credits that are ordinarily available to taxable investors. As SWFs invest in offshore markets, they also need to consider any tax treaties that may exist between the countries in which they are investing and their own country.

Endowments Private Foundations

Legal and Regulatory

Charitable organizations, including endowments and foundations, are typically subject to rules and regulations in their country of domicile that:

  • Require investment committees/officers/boards to invest on a total return basis and consider portfolio diversification when managing assets (i.e., follow the principles of modern portfolio theory, MPT);
  • Require investment committees/officers/boards to exercise a duty of care and prudence in overseeing the assets and making investment decisions (i.e., fiduciary duty).

A fiduciary is a person or entity who holds a legal or ethical relationship of trust with one or more other parties. This means going above and beyond what is legally required and always acting in the best interest of the client. A fiduciary can often be held legally responsible for failure to act in such a manner and could be held liable in court for disadvantaging their client.

Tax

Endowments are usually tax-exempt. This involves three key elements:

  • Taxation of gifts and donations to endowments and foundations: Gifts and donations to endowments and foundations are usually tax-deductible (up to a certain percentage of adjusted gross income) for the person or entity making the gift or donation.
  • Taxation of income and capital gains on assets: Income and capital gains on assets are usually tax-exempt in countries that have endowments and charitable organizations, which are tied to such non-profit, tax-exempt organizations as universities, religious organizations, or museums.
  • Taxation on payouts from endowments and foundations: Payouts are tax-exempt if the receiving institution is exempt from income tax. If payouts are made to support the operating budget of a for-profit business, then that business is required to treat the payout as taxable income.

Banks and Insurers

Legal and Regulatory

For banks and insurance companies, the liabilities to depositors, the claims of policyholders, and the amounts due to creditors are clearly and contractually defined. This means heightened regulation. For example, if an endowment fails to make a payout to the local university, this will negatively affect the ability of the university to meet its mission in perpetuity. However, it is unlikely to send shockwaves through the local economy, as might happen if a bank were unable to meet their legally required payouts on deposit accounts. This could lead to a run on banks or worse.

The regulation of financial institutions centers on making sure banks and insurance companies have adequate capitalization to absorb losses rather than allowing losses to be borne by the rest of the financial system or the real economy–including depositors, insurance policyholders, creditors, or taxpayers. This can be achieved through requirements for:

  • Diversification.
  • Asset quality (including adequate reserve provisioning for credit, market, and operational risk losses).
  • Liquidity maintenance.

As it pertains to insurance companies, regulation focuses on limiting the size and concentration of potential policy claims. In addition to limiting potential losses from assets and liabilities–or from other operational risks–regulators may mandate certain minimum required capitalization. Since the 2008 financial crisis, new legislation in the US has aimed to:

  • Increase the amount of capital needed to support the holding of certain investments.
  • Limit the payout of dividends and repurchases of common equity.
  • Make subordinated debt and preferred shareholders less able to assert their claims in the event of bankruptcy or regulator-mandated restructuring.

Tax

In terms of taxation, banks and insurance companies typically are taxable entities, and the industry-specific tax rules can be quite complicated. As taxable entities, banks and insurance companies must manage their investment programs with consideration of after-tax returns.

Banks and insurers are held to a higher standard of financial reporting, including all of the following:

  • Financial accounting, whether in the form of GAAP or IFRS, is used for communicating results to shareholders (or members), deposit or policyholders, and suppliers of debt capital. These are strict reporting requirements that ensure the availability of honest and timely financial information to investors, regulators, and the public at large.
  • Statutory accounting represents a system of adjustments to standard financial accounting. For both bank and insurance regulators, this means, most significantly, the subtracting of intangible assets from asset and common equity accounts and/or the acceleration of certain expenses, such as policy underwriting and sales costs. In addition, it also means the recognition and assignment of additional reserves against losses on assets or unexpectedly large losses on guarantees or insurance claims. This often results in lower earnings and lower common equity capital than in financial accounting.
  • Mark-to-market accounting marks all assets and liabilities (net of imputed income taxes) to current market values.

Question

As it relates to regulation for banks and insurers, regulation often focuses on all but which of the following requirements:

  1. Diversification.
  2. Asset quality.
  3. Minimum return requirements.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

Minimum return requirements would have the opposite effect when compared to the first two choices. If minimum returns were a regulatory concern, many institutions would need to hold a larger percentage of riskier assets in order to meet the minimum. This could lead to much unneeded financial instability.

A is incorrect. Diversification of an institution's portfolio can help ensure its viability through financial turmoil. Excessive investments in riskier assets can cause increased volatility, which can spill over into the local economy.

B is incorrect. A minimum asset quality, in the same vein, reduces the riskiness of an institution's portfolio. For example, a large bank with primarily sub-prime mortgage loans on its balance sheet is at greater risk of underperforming during a financial crisis, which could negatively affect the institution as a going concern, just when the local economy may need it the most.

Reading 10: Portfolio Management for Institutional Investors

Los 10 (d) Describe the focus of legal, regulatory, and tax constraints affecting different types of institutional investors

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.