Infrastructure Investment.

Infrastructure Investment.

Infrastructure investments, a subset of private market investments, are characterized by their diverse forms and scales. These investments can range from fund investments in a portfolio of infrastructure assets or projects, to co-investments, or even direct investments in a specific project or asset. The scale of these investments can vary greatly. For instance, smaller investors typically participate as one of many limited partners due to the large-scale, highly illiquid nature of these assets. Conversely, larger institutional investors often consider significant minority, majority, or even 100% ownership.

Technical and Regulatory Expertise

Infrastructure investments require a high degree of technical, engineering, regulatory, and other expertise to ensure the physical and economic feasibility over the life cycle of a project.

Smaller general partner (GP) funds and investors often co-invest with major fund managers, sovereign wealth funds, or pension funds that have the necessary resources and expertise.

Infrastructure investments are often associated with essential services or public goods, and are therefore created and supported in tightly regulated markets governed by regional or national authorities. Public entities often play a key role in determining the investment method, types of financing, and parties involved. In developing countries, regional development banks or supranational entities, such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC), often offer technical assistance for engineering and financing proposals and bid processes.

Government Support and Financing

Most developed market governments have created export credit agencies (ECAs) to promote the export of domestic goods and services via credit insurance, subsidized or guaranteed debt financing. This is often a key factor in reducing cost, extending the tenor, or increasing the availability of debt financing for capital goods used in developing market infrastructure.

ECAs play a crucial role in reducing costs, extending the tenor, or increasing the availability of debt financing for capital goods used in developing market infrastructure projects.

Special Purpose Entity (SPE) Structure in Infrastructure Projects

Objective of SPE: To govern the complex contractual relationships among various parties involved in infrastructure projects, including developers, contractors, suppliers, service providers, managers, and investors.

Custom Structure: Each project’s SPE structure is uniquely tailored to suit its specific requirements, ensuring appropriate allocation of cash sources and uses, risks, roles, and responsibilities.

Holding Company (HoldCo): Acts as a financing vehicle, separate from the project’s operational aspects but crucial for its financial structuring.

Operating Company (OpCo): Holds the project’s tangible assets, enters into contracts, and is responsible for generating cash flows from the project’s operations.

Issuance of Securities: Both HoldCo and OpCo may issue securities to raise funds. The terms of these securities, especially the seniority of claims, are crucial for investors to understand in relation to project cash flows.

Legal Segregation: SPEs ensure legal and financial separation of the project from its sponsors, limiting their risk exposure and providing clear financial demarcation.

Standardized Procedures: Infrastructure projects employ standardized procedures for selecting parties involved at various stages (development, construction, operation, financing) once the project’s size, scope, and timing are established.

Project Life Cycle Governance: The SPE structure facilitates governance over the entire project life cycle, aligning with the project’s evolving needs and stakeholder interests.

Risk and Responsibility Allocation: Within the SPE framework, there is a deliberate and detailed allocation of risks and responsibilities among the parties, helping to mitigate project-specific risks effectively.

Investor Awareness: Investors must be acutely aware of the structure of the SPE, particularly the distinctions between HoldCo and OpCo, to understand the implications for their investment’s risk and return profile.

Infrastructure Project Bidding Process and the Request for Proposal (RFP)

RFP: The RFP serves as a foundational document in the infrastructure project bidding process. It details project specifics, requirements, and timelines, alongside criteria for assessing and selecting the winning bid. The RFP specifies the size, scope, and technical requirements of the project. It also outlines the essential services the infrastructure asset must provide. This comprehensive document is made available to all interested parties intending to submit a bid.

Purpose of the RFP: The main objectives of the RFP process are to ensure a level playing field for all bidders, promote competition, and guarantee transparency throughout the bidding process.

Sealed Bid Submission: Interested parties submit their proposals through a sealed bid process. This method ensures that all bids are kept confidential until the deadline, preventing any undue influence or bias in the selection process.

Assessment Criteria: The RFP outlines specific criteria for evaluating bids. These criteria are used to assess the technical feasibility, financial viability, and overall alignment of each proposal with the project’s objectives.

Awarding Contracts: Contracts are awarded to the bidders who best meet the project’s requirements as outlined in the RFP. The decision is based on a comprehensive evaluation of each proposal against the set criteria.

Fair and Transparent Process: The RFP process is designed to be fair and transparent, providing equal opportunity to all bidders. It aims to select the most suitable proposal based on merit and alignment with project goals.

Practice Questions

Question 1: Consider an investor looking to diversify their portfolio by investing in infrastructure projects. They are considering different forms of investment, including fund investments, co-investments, and direct investments. However, they are aware that the scale of these investments can vary greatly and that they may require a high degree of technical, engineering, regulatory, and other expertise. In this context, which type of investor is most likely to consider significant minority, majority, or even 100% ownership in infrastructure investments?

  1. Smaller investors who typically invest as one of many limited partners
  2. General partner (GP) funds and other investors who lack the necessary resources and expertise
  3. Larger institutional investors

Answer: Choice C is correct.

Larger institutional investors are most likely to consider significant minority, majority, or even 100% ownership in infrastructure investments. These investors, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds, have the financial resources and often the necessary expertise to manage such large-scale investments. They are also more likely to have the long-term investment horizon that matches the long-term nature of infrastructure projects. By taking a significant ownership stake, these investors can have a greater influence over the project and potentially earn higher returns. However, this also means they bear a greater share of the risk and responsibility for the project’s success. Therefore, these types of investments are typically only suitable for larger institutional investors who have the necessary resources and expertise to manage them effectively.

Choice A is incorrect. Smaller investors who typically invest as one of many limited partners are unlikely to consider significant ownership stakes in infrastructure investments. These investors often lack the financial resources and expertise to manage such large-scale investments. They are also more likely to prefer the diversification benefits of investing as part of a larger group of investors, rather than taking on the risk and responsibility of a significant ownership stake.

Choice B is incorrect. General partner (GP) funds and other investors who lack the necessary resources and expertise are also unlikely to consider significant ownership stakes in infrastructure investments. These investors often lack the financial resources and expertise to manage such large-scale investments. They are also more likely to prefer the diversification benefits of investing as part of a larger group of investors, rather than taking on the risk and responsibility of a significant ownership stake.

Question 2: A UK-based company is planning to set up a wind farm. They understand that the project requires assembly, installation, and operation of the wind turbines to generate and transmit electricity to the power grid at optimal levels. In this context, which institution’s regulations and pricing would they need to comply with?

  1. The British Standards Institution
  2. The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets
  3. Both the British Standards Institution and the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets

Answer: Choice B is correct.

The UK-based company planning to set up a wind farm would need to comply with the regulations and pricing of The Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (Ofgem). Ofgem is the government regulator for the electricity and downstream natural gas markets in the United Kingdom. It was formed by the Utilities Act 2000 and is responsible for protecting the interests of existing and future electricity and gas consumers. This includes the regulation of the rates that power producers can charge for their electricity, as well as the standards they must meet in terms of safety, reliability, and environmental impact. In the context of a wind farm, Ofgem would be the relevant institution to ensure that the electricity generated is transmitted to the power grid at optimal levels and at fair prices.

Choice A is incorrect. The British Standards Institution (BSI) is the national standards body of the United Kingdom. BSI produces technical standards on a wide range of products and services and also supplies certification and standards-related services to businesses. While BSI may have standards that relate to the construction and operation of wind turbines, it does not regulate the transmission of electricity to the power grid or set the prices for electricity.

Choice C is incorrect. While both the British Standards Institution and the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets have roles in the broader energy sector, only Ofgem is directly involved in the regulation and pricing of electricity transmission to the power grid. Therefore, a company setting up a wind farm would primarily need to comply with Ofgem’s regulations and pricing.

Glossary

  • Infrastructure Investments: Investments made in the basic physical systems of a business or nation. Examples of infrastructure investment include roads, bridges, airports, water and sewerage facilities, and telecommunications.
  • Private Market Investments: Investments in assets that are not listed on a public exchange. These include real estate, private equity, and venture capital.
  • General Partner (GP) Funds: A type of investment fund where the fund manager is also a partner in the fund.
  • Export Credit Agencies (ECAs): Institutions that offer insurance, guarantees, or loans to domestic companies to protect them against the risk of non-payment by foreign buyers.
  • International Finance Corporation (IFC): An international financial institution that offers investment, advisory, and asset management services to encourage private sector development in developing countries.
  • Special Purpose Entity (SPE): A legal entity created to fulfill narrow, specific, or temporary objectives. SPEs are typically used by companies to isolate the firm from financial risk.
  • International Air Transport Association (IATA): An international industry trade group of airlines headquartered in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, where the International Civil Aviation Organization is also headquartered.
  • Request for Proposal (RFP): A business document that announces and provides details about a project, as well as solicits bids from contractors who will help complete the project.

Private Markets Pathway Volume 2: Learning Module 7: Infrastructure; LOS 7(b): Discuss infrastructure investment methods and investment vehicles and their uses

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.