Time Weighted Return

Time Weighted Return

Time weighted return (“TWR”) is a method of calculating portfolio returns via linking sub-period returns and adjusting for the effect of large external cash flows.

  • Portfolios using TWR must be valued monthly.
  • Portfolios must also be valued at the time of large external cash flows (large is defined by the firm ahead of time).

No External Cash Flows

In the simplest case, when no external cash flows (i.e., client-initiated additions to or withdrawals from invested assets) occur during the period, calculating the TWR is straightforward:

$$ R_t = \frac {(V_1 – V_0)}{V_0} $$

Where:

\(r_t\) = the TWR for period t.

\(V_1\) = the ending value of the portfolio, including cash and accrued income, at the end of the period.

\(V_0\) = the portfolio’s beginning value, including cash and accrued income, at the beginning of the specified period.

Minimal Cash Flows

When there are minimal cash flows in a portfolio (not large), the GIPS Standards for Firms don’t mandate valuing the portfolio on the cash flow date. Instead, firms can use a method that adjusts for daily weighted cash flows, approximating a true Time Weighted Return (TWR).

The most accurate way to calculate total return while eliminating the impact of external cash flows is to value the portfolio whenever such cash flows happen, compute a sub-period return, and geometrically link these sub-period returns expressed in relative form using a specific equation.

$$ r_{twr} = (1 + r_{t,1}) \times (1 + r_{t,2}) \times \cdots \times (1 + r_{t,n}) − 1 $$

where:

\(r_{twr}\) = The time-weighted total return for the entire period.

\(r_{t,1}\) through \(r_{t,n}\) = The subperiod returns.

The GIPS standards require that the periodic returns be geometrically linked.

Modified Dietz Approach

When a portfolio encounters cash flows that aren’t considered large, and the firm doesn’t compute daily performance, it should calculate portfolio returns using a method that adjusts for daily weighted cash flows. Acceptable approaches for this calculation include the Modified Dietz method and the Modified Internal Rate of Return (Modified IRR) method. Both of these methods assign weight to each cash flow based on the proportion of the measurement period it remains in the portfolio.

$$ {r_\text{ModDietz}} = \frac {V_1 – V_o – CF}{V_o + \sum_{i=1}^{n}(CF_i \times w_i)} $$

Where:

\(V_o + \sum_{i=1}^{n}(CF_i \times w_i)\) = Sum of each cash flow multiplied by its weight, and weight \((w_i)\) is simply the proportion of the measurement period, in days, that each cash flow has been in the portfolio.

$$ w_i = \frac{CD – Di}{CD} $$

Where:

\(CD\) = Calendar days in the measurement period.

\(D_i\) = the number of calendar days from the beginning of the period to the time the cash flow \(Cf_i\) occurs.

Modified Internal Rate of Return

Another acceptable approach for calculating portfolio returns when there are non-large cash flows, and daily performance isn’t computed is the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR). While the computational details of MIRR can be complex, candidates can use computer programs or approved exam business calculators to perform the calculation if necessary. This topic is introduced in Level 1, and candidates are encouraged to review it for better understanding.

Reading 33: Global Investment Performance Standards

Los 33 b: Discuss requirements of the GIPS standards with respect to return calculation methodologies, including the treatment of external cash flows, cash and cash equivalents, and expenses and fees

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.