Effects of Behavioral Factors on Adviser-Client Interactions

Effects of Behavioral Factors on Adviser-Client Interactions

A successful client-adviser relationship is characterized by the planning, construction, and selection of the most optimal portfolio for the client. This involves staying the course, bolstered by solid communication between both parties. The first logical step is to have the client fill out a risk tolerance questionnaire.

Four traits of successful client-adviser relationships:

  1. The adviser understands the investment goals of the client.
  2. The adviser maintains a consistent approach.
  3. The adviser meets the client’s expectations.
  4. Both parties benefit from the relationship.

Risk Tolerance Questionnaires

During the initial stages of a client-adviser relationship, the adviser should administer a risk tolerance questionnaire. The adviser should use the questionnaire to assess the client’s attitude toward risk. Further, it is recommended that this questionnaire be re-administered annually during an IPS update.

While not a perfect solution, risk tolerance questionnaires represent a reasonable first attempt to get to know a client. Advisers should be aware of the following challenges associated with administering and using these questionnaires:

  • Emotional biases – While questionnaires are helpful in establishing cognitive biases, they often do not capture emotional biases. Clients may not want to admit that they lack the self-control to save for the future. 
  • Framing – Clients may interpret and answer the same question differently, even as a result of minor wording or syntactic changes.
  • Inconsistent answers – Consistent with behavioral finance, clients’ answers may vary significantly depending on the context in which the questionnaire is fielded. This is why it is advisable for advisers to administer the assessments annually at the IPS update.

Question

Which of the following is most likely to be accurately captured by a risk-tolerance questionnaire?

  1. Framing bias.
  2. Behavioral biases.
  3. Cognitive biases.

Solution

The correct answer is C:

Traditional risk tolerance questionnaires are more appropriate for institutional investors than individuals since they employ a cognitive approach when investing. It is noteworthy that the cognitive approach gives a better understanding of risk and returns.

A is incorrect: Framing bias would potentially affect how a risk tolerance questionnaire is answered.

B is incorrect: Behavioral biases are less likely to pop up on risk-tolerance questionnaires since they are more emotional and do not lend themselves to qualitative assessment. 

Reading 2: Behavioral Finance and Investment Processes

LOS 2 (b) Discuss how behavioral factors affect adviser–client interactions

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.