Building Blocks of Active Equity Portfolio Construction

Building Blocks of Active Equity Portfolio Construction

Active returns are assessed in relation to a benchmark. If a portfolio holds the same securities in the same proportions as the benchmark, no active return exists. However, active return emerges when the portfolio manager starts to allocate more or less to certain securities compared to the benchmark. The equation depicts this:

$$ R_A = \sum \Delta W_i R_i $$

Where:

\(R_A\) = Active return.

\(R_i\) = Return from security i.

\(\Delta W\) = The active weight security i.

Sources of Active Returns

Active returns can be earned through the following categories:

  1. Exposure to rewarded factors: These are attributes linked to positive long-term returns, such as beta, size, and value. This aligns with the concept of Smart Beta discussed earlier.
  2. Tactical exposures to mispriced securities, sectors, or rewarded risks: Managers with valuation insights can profit from mispricing by making strategic investments.
  3. Idiosyncratic risk (Luck): This risk arises from luck and isn’t attributable to the previous two factors.

The breakdown of realized active return (historical return) is illustrated by the following equation:

$$ R_A = \sum (B_{pk} – B_{bk}) \times F_k + (\alpha + e) $$

Where:

\(B_{pk}\) = Portfolio sensitivity to a rewarded factor.

\(B_{bk}\) = Benchmark sensitivity to a rewarded factor.

\(F_k\) = The return of the rewarded factor.

\(\alpha\) = The return attributable to alpha (manager skill).

\(e\) = The return attributable to idiosyncratic risk (noise, chance, etc.).

Integrating the Building Blocks Breadth of Expertise

A manager demonstrates breadth of expertise by effectively merging all sources of active return to generate portfolio alpha. The fundamental law of active management provides a useful formula to dissect the elements contributing to outperforming a benchmark, allowing the calculation of the expected active return:

$$ E(R_A) = IC \ BR^{0.5} \sigma_{RA}\ TC $$

Where:

\(E(R_A)\) = Active return expected.

\(IC\) = Information coefficient.

\(BR^{0.5}\) = Square root of the breadth.

\(\sigma_{RA}\) = Manager's active risk.

\(TC\) = Transfer coefficient.

The information coefficient gauges the correlation between manager forecasts and actual expected returns. This could be thought of as a number between -1 and 1 which indicates how well the manager predicts movements in market prices.

Breadth refers to the number of independent decisions a manager makes annually. More independent decisions tend to result in higher active returns.

The transfer coefficient (TC) measures portfolio construction constraints. It varies between 0 and 1, with 1 signifying complete freedom and 0 indicating total constraints. A TC of 0 means no active returns can be earned, as per the fundamental law of active management.

Question

According to the fundamental law of active management, a portfolio with higher constraints would be expected to experience:

  1. Lower TC; lower active returns.
  2. Higher TC; lower active returns.
  3. Lower TC; higher active returns.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

It suggests that higher constraints would lead to a lower Information Coefficient (IC) and a lower Breadth (BR). If this were true, the Information Ratio (IR) would decrease, leading to lower active returns. This is a reasonable interpretation of the fundamental law of active management, so this choice is correct.

Formula:

$$ E(R_A) = IC \ BR^{0.5} \ \sigma_{RA} \ TC $$

TC with Value of 1:

$$ 1= (1) \times (1) \times (1) \times (1) $$

TC with Value of 0:

$$ 0= (1) \times (1) \times (0) \times (1) $$

B is incorrect. It implies that higher constraints would lead to a higher Information Coefficient (IC) and lower Breadth (BR). If this were the case, the Information Ratio (IR) could go either way. The IR depends on both IC and BR, and it's not clear how they would change in relation to each other when constraints increase. So, this choice is not necessarily correct because it oversimplifies the relationship.

C is incorrect. It suggests that higher constraints would lead to a higher Information Coefficient (IC) and a higher Breadth (BR). While a higher BR may lead to the potential for more independent investment opportunities, this alone doesn't guarantee higher active returns. A higher IC is important for generating more accurate forecasts, but it's not clear how the trade-off between IC and BR would work with increased constraints. This choice oversimplifies the relationship and is not necessarily correct.

Reading 26: Active Equity Investing: Portfolio Construction

Los 26 (a) Describe elements of a manager's investment philosophy that influence the portfolio construction process

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.
    Nyka Smith
    Nyka Smith
    2021-02-18
    Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man!
    Badr Moubile
    Badr Moubile
    2021-02-13
    Very helpfull!
    Agustin Olcese
    Agustin Olcese
    2021-01-27
    Excellent explantions, very clear!
    Jaak Jay
    Jaak Jay
    2021-01-14
    Awesome content, kudos to Prof.James Frojan
    sindhushree reddy
    sindhushree reddy
    2021-01-07
    Crisp and short ppt of Frm chapters and great explanation with examples.