 # Using P/Es to Obtain Terminal Value in Multistage Dividend Discount Models

When estimating the terminal value, analysts use price multiples such as P/Es and P/Bs to estimate terminal values. There are two significant approaches to computing terminal values based on multiples:

### I. Terminal Price Multiples based on Fundamentals

The terminal value is computed as the product of the justified multiple and the estimate of earnings.

\begin{align*}\text{Terminal value}_{\text{n}}&=\text{Justified leading P⁄E}\times \text{Forecasted earnings}_{(\text{n}+1)}\\ \text{Terminal value}_{\text{n}}&=\text{Justified trailing P⁄E}\times \text{Forecasted earnings}_ {(\text{n})}\end{align*}

### ii. Terminal Price Multiples based on Comparables

The terminal value is computed as the product of the benchmark multiple and the estimate of earnings.

\begin{align*}\text{Terminal value}_{\text{n}}&=\text{Benchmark leading P⁄E}\times \text{Forecasted earnings}_{(\text{n}+1)}\\ \text{Benchmark value}_{\text{n}}&=\text{Justified leading P⁄E}\times \text{Forecasted earnings}_ {(\text{n})}\end{align*}

The benchmark value could be the:

• Median industry P/E.
• Average industry P/E.
• Average of own past P/E.

An advantage of the price multiples approach is that it is grounded in market data, unlike the Gordon growth model that is based on multiple estimates and is very sensitive to changes in these estimates.

A disadvantage is that if the benchmark value is mispriced, the estimate of the terminal value will also reflect this mispricing.

#### Example: Estimating Terminal Value

Consider the following information:

$$\small{\begin{array}{l|l}\textbf{Values for subject firm} & \\ \hline\text{Required rate of return} & 10\% \\ \hline\text{EPS forecast in year five} & 1.4\\ \end{array}}$$

$$\small{\begin{array}{l|l}\textbf{Values for peer group} & \\ \hline \text{Mean dividend payout ratio} & 0.35 \\ \hline \text{Mean ROE} & 6\% \\ \hline \text{Median P/E} & 8\\ \end{array}}$$

Using P/Es to determine terminal value using the Gordon Growth model:

\begin{align*}\text{D}_5&= \text{EPS}_5\times\text{Dividend payout ratio}\\&=1.4 \times0.35\\&=0.49\end{align*}

\begin{align*}\text{Retention ratio}&=1-\text{Dividend payout ratio}\\&=1-0.35\\&=0.65\end{align*}

\begin{align*}\text{g}&=\text{Retention ratio} \times\text{ROE}\\&=0.65 ×6\%\\&=3.9\%\end{align*}

\begin{align*}\text{V}_5&=\frac{\text{D}_5(1+\text{g})}{\text{r}-\text{g}}\\&=\frac{0.49(1.039)}{0.10-0.039}\\&=8.35\end{align*}

Using P/Es to determine terminal value using comparables:

\begin{align*}\text{V}_5&= \text{P⁄E}\times\text{EPS}_5\\&=8×1.4\\&=11.20\end{align*}

## Question

Consider the following information:

$$\small{\begin{array}{l|l}\textbf{The required rate of return} & 14\% \\ \hline\text{EPS forecast for year six} & 2.5 \\ \hline\text{ROE} & 7\% \\ \hline\text{Dividend payout ratio} & 30\%\\ \end{array}}$$

The terminal value in year value is closest to:

1. 75.
2. 9.
3. 24.

### Solution

\begin{align*}\text{g}&=\text{Retention ratio}\times\text{ROE}\\ \\ \text{Retention ratio}&=1-\text{Dividend payout ratio}\\ &=1-0.30=0.70\\ \\ \text{g}&=0.70\times0.07\\&=4.9\%\\ \\ \text{D}_6&= 2.5 \times0.30\\&=0.75\\ \\ \text{V}_5&=\frac{0.75}{0.14-0.049}\\&=8.24\end{align*}

Reading 25: Market-Based Valuation: Price and Enterprise Value Multiples

LOS 25 (l) Calculate and explain the use of price multiples in determining terminal value in a multistage discounted cash flow (DCF) model.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep Level I
Level II
Level III
All Three Levels
Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep FRM Part I
FRM Part II
FRM Part I & Part II
Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Exam P (Probability)
Exam FM (Financial Mathematics)
Exams P & FM GMAT® Complete Course Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way! michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended. Nyka Smith
2021-02-18
Every concept is very well explained by Nilay Arun. kudos to you man! 2021-02-13   