Large institutional investors are entities that manage and invest capital on behalf of their clients. These clients could range from individual investors seeking long-term capital growth to organizations with financial obligations. Unlike individual investors who invest their own capital, institutional investors have a broader scope and objectives.
Institutional investors are tasked with securing, pooling, and managing capital. They design and implement investment strategies that span over long horizons, often decades, to meet their clients’ financial obligations. For instance, pension funds and insurance companies have long-term obligations towards their clients and hence, they need to ensure a steady return on investments.
While executing their strategies, institutional investors measure and evaluate their investment performance against defined indices or benchmarks. They also use risk measures, such as various measures of volatility, to quantify the risk associated with client funds. For example, BlackRock, a large institutional investor, uses a variety of risk measures to manage its clients’ portfolios.
Many large institutional investors have the resources to conduct extensive research and analysis to identify investment opportunities in various markets, sectors, and asset classes. Due to their size, they benefit from economies of scale that reduce their expenses. These savings can be passed onto their clients, who may not have the same capital or professional research capabilities.
Individual investors are private entities who utilize their personal capital to achieve a variety of objectives. These objectives can be as diverse as growing personal wealth, saving for retirement, purchasing a car or home, starting a business, or leaving a legacy for their heirs. The time horizons for these objectives can be short-, medium-, or long-term. For instance, a short-term financial goal might be saving for a vacation in the next two years, while a long-term goal could be planning for retirement over the next 30 years.
Individual investors manage multiple smaller liabilities, such as saving for a house or retirement, with different certainty throughout their lives. These investment objectives, also referred to as liabilities, are more likely to change or evolve over time as the family’s situation changes. For example, an individual might initially invest to buy a house, but later shift their focus to saving for their child’s education.
Individual investors are usually taxed on their investment income, capital gains, or dividends, and their decisions may hinge on the tax implications of their investment choices. For instance, an investor living in New York might have different tax obligations compared to someone living in Florida due to different state tax laws.
Performance for individual investors is gauged by their ability to meet their financial objectives. If they do not fulfill their financial goals or obligations, they have underperformed their objectives. For example, if an individual’s goal was to save $1 million for retirement but only managed to save $800,000, they would be considered to have underperformed.
However, there are some individual investors, particularly Ultra High Net Worth Individuals (UHNWIs), for whom investment strategies, objectives, and resources are more akin to those of a small or medium-size institution than those of an average individual investor. For instance, a UHNWI might have a significant portion of their portfolio allocated to private equity, a type of investment typically not accessible to the average investor.
Investor domicile refers to the home country of an investor. Significant differences exist between investors from developed markets (e.g., the United States, Germany), which typically feature robust financial systems and transparency, and investors from emerging markets (e.g., India, Brazil), where fewer formal investment opportunities may be available. Many emerging market investors seek diversification into developed markets, and vice versa, to achieve broader risk and return profiles.
$$ \small{\begin{array}{l|l|l}
\textbf{Characteristic} & {\textbf{Institutional} \\ \textbf{Investors}} & {\textbf{Individual} \\ \textbf{Investors}} \\ \hline
\text{Purpose} & {\text{Focused on achieving} \\ \text{specific goals, often} \\ \text{managing large-scale} \\ \text{portfolios for pensions,} \\ \text{endowments, or insurance} \\ \text{funds.}} & {\text{Varies widely, typically} \\ \text{aimed at personal} \\ \text{wealth accumulation,} \\ \text{retirement savings, or} \\ \text{education funding.}} \\ \hline
{\text{Investment} \\ \text{Objectives}} & {\text{Defined and stable over} \\ \text{time, with a focus on risk-} \\ \text{adjusted returns and} \\ \text{aligning with liability} \\ \text{structures.}} & {\text{Flexible and dynamic,} \\ \text{changing based on} \\ \text{personal life events,} \\ \text{market conditions, or} \\ \text{financial goals.}} \\ \hline
{\text{Number of} \\ \text{Liabilities}} & {\text{Manages numerous} \\ \text{liabilities, such as future} \\ \text{pension payments or} \\ \text{insurance claims.}} & {\text{Few liabilities, such as a} \\ \text{mortgage, personal} \\ \text{loans, or education} \\ \text{expenses.}} \\ \hline
{\text{Relative Size} \\ \text{of Individual} \\ \text{Liabilities}} & {\text{Typically small relative to} \\ \text{the overall portfolio size,} \\ \text{allowing for diversification.}} & {\text{Can be significant} \\ \text{relative to the} \\ \text{individual’s wealth,} \\ \text{making concentration} \\ \text{risks higher.}} \\ \hline
\text{Time Horizon} & {\text{Often long-term or} \\ \text{perpetual, focusing on} \\ \text{intergenerational wealth or} \\ \text{institutional obligations.}} & {\text{Shorter and varies} \\ \text{based on personal} \\ \text{goals like retirement or} \\ \text{purchasing a home.}} \\ \hline
\text{Asset Size} & {\text{Significantly larger, often in} \\ \text{the billions, allowing for} \\ \text{economies of scale.}} & {\text{Relatively small, often} \\ \text{limited to personal} \\ \text{income and savings.}} \\ \hline
\text{Investment Options} & {\text{Access to a wider range of} \\ \text{instruments like private} \\ \text{equity, hedge funds, and} \\ \text{large-scale real estate} \\ \text{projects.}} & {\text{Limited to standard} \\ \text{products like stocks,} \\ \text{bonds, and mutual} \\ \text{funds.}} \\ \hline
\text{Tax Situation} & {\text{Often tax-exempt or enjoys} \\ \text{significant tax advantages,} \\ \text{depending on the type of} \\ \text{institution.}} & {\text{Usually taxable, with} \\ \text{tax considerations} \\ \text{significantly impacting} \\ \text{investment decisions.}} \\ \hline
{\text{Performance} \\ \text{Measurement}} & {\text{Measured against} \\ \text{benchmarks or indices to} \\ \text{assess performance} \\ \text{objectively.}} & {\text{Focuses on meeting} \\ \text{specific personal} \\ \text{financial goals or} \\ \text{avoiding shortfalls.}} \\ \hline
{\text{Client} \\ \text{Sophistication}} & {\text{Highly sophisticated,} \\ \text{involving professional} \\ \text{teams and advisors.}} & {\text{Varies widely; typically} \\ \text{less experienced or} \\ \text{reliant on financial} \\ \text{advisors.}} \\ \hline
\text{Risk} & {\text{Quantified and managed} \\ \text{through advanced models} \\ \text{and diversification} \\ \text{strategies.}} & {\text{Often emotional and} \\ \text{subjective, focused on} \\ \text{avoiding major losses.}} \\ \hline
\text{Customization} & {\text{Low to medium, as} \\ \text{standardized strategies are} \\ \text{often employed for} \\ \text{efficiency.}} & {\text{High, tailored to} \\ \text{personal goals and risk} \\ \text{tolerances.}} \\
\end{array}} $$
The Wealth Life Cycle helps explain how human capital, financial capital, and net worth evolve throughout an individual’s life. It is divided into distinct phases:
An individual’s economic value extends beyond a simple net worth statement; it also incorporates human capital and pension benefits. This concept is often expressed using the “economic balance sheet,” where both current assets (e.g., financial assets, real estate) and future income streams (human capital, pensions) are compared against future liabilities (e.g., consumption needs).
The economic balance sheet includes:
The surplus is the difference between these assets and liabilities, focusing on the present value of both sides. This view helps determine how resources can be allocated efficiently over an individual’s lifetime.
Human capital represents the present value of future income from employment, adjusted for risks such as mortality and job loss. The formula for human capital is:
$$
HC = \sum_{t=1}^{N} \frac{p(s_t)\, w_{t-1} \,(1 + g_t)}{(1 + r_f + y)^t}
$$
Where:
This equation discounts projected earnings by a rate that includes the risk-free rate and a premium for income volatility. Mortality probabilities further adjust the expected income stream to reflect the uncertainty of survival to future years.
This concept is used when evaluating retirement benefits and other future cash flows (e.g., pensions). Each expected payment is multiplied by the probability of surviving to that payment date, and discounted to the present. Likewise, real estate holdings (e.g., a personal residence) can play a role in retirement planning, whether through downsizing or leveraging home equity.
Pension systems generally fall into two broad categories:
For affluent individuals, pension wealth may be a smaller component of total net worth. However, in many cases, these pensions still represent a reliable source of retirement income that requires proper evaluation for overall financial planning.
During the accumulation phase, individuals must consider how their human capital (stable vs. volatile) interacts with their investment portfolios. For someone with a stable salary, a higher equity allocation is often suitable, while an entrepreneur or someone with an uncertain income stream may be more conservative (e.g., government bonds, diversified exposures) to limit correlated risks.
As individuals retire, they shift toward a decumulation strategy. Those with a significant pension may place greater importance on preserving capital for future generations or philanthropic goals. On the other hand, individuals relying primarily on investment portfolios must carefully manage withdrawal rates, maintain purchasing power, and protect against longevity risk.
Pension wealth can be vulnerable to employer-specific or governmental risks, so diversifying into lower-risk fixed-income instruments may reduce the risk of underfunded liabilities or default—but this may come at the cost of lower returns.
Over the course of retirement, the proportion of total resources in an individual’s investment portfolio typically decreases as funds are spent. Mortality-weighted pension benefits and real estate often have a heightened impact on financial security, emphasizing the need for prudent long-term care strategies and contingency planning.
Changes in human capital, financial capital, and net worth across an individual’s life cycle are pivotal in shaping financial decisions. Early in life, human capital dominates; maximizing and protecting that potential is key. In mid-life, emphasis often shifts to building financial capital and preparing for retirement. Finally, in retirement, maintaining adequate cash flows, managing longevity risk, and safeguarding pension assets become critical. A comprehensive economic balance sheet approach—one that includes human capital, financial assets, and pension benefits—ensures decisions are aligned with each life stage’s unique risks and objectives.
Practice Questions
Question 1: Large institutional investors play a significant role in the financial market, managing capital on behalf of their clients. They are responsible for securing, pooling, and managing capital, often with the objective of meeting their clients’ financial obligations. These investors have the resources to conduct extensive research and analysis to identify investment opportunities in various markets, sectors, and asset classes. They also benefit from economies of scale that reduce their expenses. Considering these characteristics, which of the following statements is most accurate about large institutional investors?
- Large institutional investors primarily focus on short-term investment strategies to meet their clients’ financial obligations.
- Large institutional investors do not measure and evaluate their investment performance against defined indices or benchmarks.
- Large institutional investors often design and implement investment strategies that span over long horizons, often decades, to meet their clients’ financial obligations.
Answer: Choice C is correct.
Large institutional investors often design and implement investment strategies that span over long horizons, often decades, to meet their clients’ financial obligations. This is because their clients, such as pension funds, insurance companies, and endowments, typically have long-term financial obligations. These investors have the resources to conduct extensive research and analysis to identify investment opportunities in various markets, sectors, and asset classes. They also benefit from economies of scale that reduce their expenses. By focusing on long-term investment strategies, they can take advantage of compounding returns and mitigate short-term market volatility. They also have the flexibility to invest in illiquid assets, such as private equity and real estate, which can offer higher returns over the long term. Therefore, it is accurate to say that large institutional investors often design and implement investment strategies that span over long horizons to meet their clients’ financial obligations.
Choice A is incorrect. Large institutional investors do not primarily focus on short-term investment strategies to meet their clients’ financial obligations. While they may engage in short-term trading activities, their primary focus is on long-term investment strategies that align with their clients’ financial obligations. Short-term investment strategies are typically associated with higher transaction costs and greater risk, which may not be suitable for large institutional investors with long-term financial obligations.
Choice B is incorrect. Large institutional investors do measure and evaluate their investment performance against defined indices or benchmarks. This is an important part of their investment process, as it allows them to assess their performance and make necessary adjustments to their investment strategies. It also provides transparency to their clients and helps them meet their fiduciary responsibilities.
Question 2: Large institutional investors have the resources to conduct extensive research and analysis to identify investment opportunities in various markets, sectors, and asset classes. They also benefit from economies of scale that reduce their expenses. Given these characteristics, which of the following statements is most accurate about the benefits that clients of large institutional investors receive?
- Clients of large institutional investors do not benefit from the economies of scale that reduce the expenses of these investors.
- Clients of large institutional investors may benefit from the economies of scale that reduce the expenses of these investors, as these savings can be passed onto them.
- Clients of large institutional investors are charged higher fees due to the extensive research and analysis conducted by these investors.
Answer: Choice B is correct.
Clients of large institutional investors may indeed benefit from the economies of scale that reduce the expenses of these investors. Economies of scale refer to the cost advantages that entities obtain due to their scale of operation, with cost per unit of output generally decreasing with increasing scale as fixed costs are spread out over more units of output. Large institutional investors have the resources to conduct extensive research and analysis, which can lead to better investment decisions and higher returns. They also have the ability to negotiate lower transaction costs due to the large volume of trades they conduct, which can further enhance returns. These cost savings can be passed onto their clients in the form of lower fees or higher net returns, thereby benefiting the clients. Therefore, it is accurate to say that clients of large institutional investors may benefit from the economies of scale that reduce the expenses of these investors.
Choice A is incorrect. This statement is not accurate because, as explained above, clients of large institutional investors can indeed benefit from the economies of scale that reduce the expenses of these investors. The cost savings achieved by large institutional investors can be passed onto their clients, thereby benefiting them.
Choice C is incorrect. While it is true that large institutional investors conduct extensive research and analysis, this does not necessarily mean that they charge higher fees to their clients. In fact, the economies of scale that these investors enjoy can allow them to spread the costs of research and analysis over a larger asset base, potentially leading to lower fees for their clients. Therefore, this statement is not accurate.
LOS 4(b): evaluate how changes in human capital, financial capital, and economic net worth across the financial stages of an individual’s life influence their financial decision making