Understanding Test Statistics

Understanding Test Statistics

A test statistic is a standardized value computed from sample information when testing hypotheses. It compares the given data with what an analyst would expect under the null hypothesis. As such, it is a major determinant when deciding whether to reject H0, the null hypothesis.

We use the test statistic to gauge the degree of agreement between sample data and the null hypothesis. Analysts use the following formula when calculating the test statistic.

$$ \text{Test statistic} = \cfrac { (\text{sample statistic} – \text{hypothesized value})}{\text{Standard error of the sample statistic}} $$

The test statistic is a random variable that changes from one sample to another. The following table  gives a brief outline of the various test statistics used regularly, based on the distribution the data presumably follows:

$$
\begin{array}{l|r}
\text{Hypothesis Test} & \text{Test statistic} \\
\text{Z-test} & \text{Z-statistic (normal distribution)} \\
\text{Chi-square test} & \text{Chi-square statistic} \\
\text{t-test} & \text{t-statistic} \\
\text{ANOVA} & \text{F-statistic} \\
\end{array}
$$

We can subdivide the set of values that the test statistic can take into two regions: the non-rejection region, which is consistent with the H0, and the rejection region (critical region), which is inconsistent with the H0. If the test statistic has a value found within the critical region, we reject the H0.

Like with any other statistic, the distribution of the test statistic must be completely specified under the H0 when the H0 is true.

Type I and Type II Errors

While using sample statistics to draw conclusions about the parameters of an entire population, there is always the possibility that the sample collected does not accurately represent the population. Consequently, statistical tests carried out using such sample data may yield incorrect results that may lead to erroneous rejection (or lack thereof) of the null hypothesis. We have two types of errors:

Type I Error

Type I error occurs when we reject a true null hypothesis. For example, a type I error would manifest in rejecting H0 = 0 when it is actually zero.

Type II Error

Type II error occurs when we fail to reject a false null hypothesis. In such a scenario, the test provides insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false.

The level of significance, denoted by α, represents the probability of making a type I error, i.e., rejecting the null hypothesis when it’s true. α is the direct opposite of β, which is the probability of making a type II error within the bounds of statistical testing. The ideal but practically impossible statistical test would be one that simultaneously minimizes α and β. We use α to determine critical values that subdivide the distribution into the rejection and the non-rejection regions. The figure below gives an example of the critical regions under a two-tailed normal distribution and 5% significance level:

two-tailed-test


Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.