# Portfolio Risk Measures

Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) evaluates investment options based on mean return and return variance. This approach is applicable when investors are risk-averse, meaning they seek to maximize their expected satisfaction or utility from their investments.

Mean-return analysis holds under two assumptions:

1. Returns follow a normal distribution.
2. Investors have quadratic utility functions, a mathematical model representing the balance between risk and return.

The mean-variance analysis can be reasonably accurate even if the two assumptions aren’t entirely met. Professionals prefer using observable data, such as returns. The assumption that returns roughly follow a normal distribution has played a crucial role in applying MPT.

Mean-variance analysis only considers risk symmetrically. This implies that standard deviation reflects variability above and below the mean. An alternative strategy is focusing on downside risk. One such method is safety-first rules.

Before we dive into safety-first rules, we discuss Shortfall risk.

## Shortfall Risk

Shortfall risk refers to the probability that a portfolio will not exceed the minimum (benchmark) return an investor sets. In other words, it is the risk that a portfolio will fall short of the level of return considered acceptable by an investor. As such, shortfall risks are downside risks. While a shortfall risk focuses on the downside economic risk, the standard deviation measures the overall volatility of a financial asset.

## Safety-First Ratio

Roy’s safety-first criterion states that the optimal portfolio is the one that minimizes the probability that a portfolio return, denoted by $$R_P$$, may fall below the threshold level of return, $$R_L$$. The optimal portfolio minimizes $$P(R_P \lt R_L)$$

As such, if returns are distributed normally, the optimal portfolio is the one with the highest safety-first ratio defined as:

$$\text{SFRatio}= \frac {E(R_P)-R_L}{\sigma_P}$$

The numerator, $$E(R_P-R_L)$$, represents the distance from the mean return to the threshold level, i.e., it measures the excess return over and above the threshold level of return per unit risk.

Intuitively, if the returns are normally distributed, the safety-first optimal portfolio maximizes the SFRatio.

Given a portfolio SFRatio, the probability that its return will be less than $$R_L$$ is:

$$P(R_P \lt R_L)=N(-\text{SFRatio})$$

The safety-first optimal portfolio has the lowest $$P(R_P\lt R_L)$$.

Example: Safety-first Ratio

An investor sets a minimum threshold of 3%. There are three portfolios from which he is to choose one. The expected return and the standard deviation for each portfolio are given below:

$$\begin{array}{c|c|c|c} & \textbf{Portfolio A} & \textbf{Portfolio B} & \textbf{Portfolio C} \\ \hline \text{Expected return} & 5\% & 10\% & 20\% \\ \hline \text{Standard deviation} & 15\% & 20\% & 25\% \end{array}$$

What is the optimal portfolio for the investor?

Solution

Compute the safety-first ratio for each of the three portfolios and then compare them.

For portfolio $$A$$:

$$\text{SFRatio}_A =\frac {5-3}{15}=0.1333$$

Similarly, for portfolio B:

$$\text{SFRatio}_B = \frac {10-3}{20}=0.35$$

Lastly:

$$\text{SFRatio}_C=\frac {20-3}{25}=0.68$$

The optimal portfolio should maximize the safety-first ratio. Comparing the three ratios, it is easy to notice that the safety-first ratio for portfolio $$C$$ is the highest. Therefore, the investor should choose portfolio $$C$$.

## Question

The returns on a fund are distributed normally. At the end of year $$t$$, the fund has a value of $100,000. At the end of year $$t+1$$, the fund manager wishes to withdraw$10,000 for further funding but is reluctant to tap into the \$100,000. There are two investment options:

$$\begin{array}{c|c|c} & \textbf{Portfolio A} & \textbf{Portfolio B} \\ \hline \text{Expected return} & 14\% & 13\% \\ \hline \text{Standard deviation} & 17\% & 20\% \end{array}$$

Which portfolio is preferable for the manager?

1. Portfolio A.
2. Portfolio B.
3. The manager is indifferent to the two portfolios.

Solution

First, you should calculate the threshold return from the information given. Since there should be no tapping into the fund, the threshold return is:

$$\frac {10,000}{100,000}=10\% \text{ or } 0.1$$

You should then calculate the safety-first ratio for each portfolio:

\begin{align*} \text{SFRatio}_A & =\frac {14-10}{17}=0.24 \\ \text{SFRatio}_B & = \frac {13-10}{20}=0.15 \end{align*}

Portfolio $$A$$ has the highest safety-first ratio. This is the reason it is the most desirable.

You can also go a step further and calculate $$P(R_P \lt R_L)$$. To do this, you would have to negate each safety-first ratio and then find the CDF of the standard normal distribution for the resulting value. That is,

\begin{align*} P(R_P \lt R_L )&=N(-\text{SFRatio}) \\ N(-0.24) &=1-N(0.24)\\ &=1-0.5948=0.4052 \\ N(-0.15) &=1-N(0.15)\\&=1-0.5596=0.4404 \end{align*}

$$(-\text{where SFRatio is the z-value})$$

For portfolio $$A$$, there is approximately a 40% probability of obtaining a return below the threshold return. For portfolio $$B$$, this probability rises to 44%. Therefore, we choose the option for which the chance of not exceeding the benchmark return is lowest – portfolio $$A$$.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.