Updating Probability Using Bayes’ Fo ...
Bayes’ formula is used to calculate an updated or posterior probability given a... Read More
A chi-square test is used to establish whether a hypothesized value of variance is equal to, less than, or greater than the true population variance. Unlike most distributions covered in the CFA® Program curriculum, the chi-square distribution is asymmetrical. However, the distribution approaches the “normal” one as the degrees of freedom increase.

As a natural consequence, the chi-square distribution has no negative values and is bounded by zero. A chi-square statistic with (n – 1) degrees of freedom is computed as:
$$ { \chi }_{ n-1 }^{ 2 }=\frac { \left( n-1 \right) { S }^{ 2 } }{ { \sigma }_{ 0 }^{ 2 } } $$
Where:
\(n\) = Sample size.
\(S^2\) = Sample variance.
\({ \sigma }_{ 0 }^{ 2 }\) = Hypothesized population variance.
For the 15-year period between 1995 and 2010, ABC’s monthly return had a standard deviation of 5%. John Matthew, CFA, wishes to establish whether the standard deviation witnessed during that period still adequately describes the long-term standard deviation of the company’s return. To achieve this end, he collects data on the monthly returns recorded between 1st January, 2015 and 31st December, 2016 and computes a monthly standard deviation of 4%.
Carry out a 5% test to determine if the standard deviation computed in the latter period is different from the 15-year value.
Solution
As is the norm, start by writing down the hypothesis
\(H_0: \sigma_0^2= 0.0025\)
\(H_1: \sigma^2 \neq 0.0025\)
Since the latter period has 24 months, n = 24. The test statistic is:
$$ { \chi }_{ 24-1 }^{ 2 }=\frac { \left( 24-1 \right) { 0.0016 } }{ 0.0025 } =14.72 $$
This is a two-tailed test. As such, we have to divide the significance level by two and screen our test statistic against the lower and upper 2.5% points of \({ \chi }_{ 23 }^{ 2 }\).
Consulting the chi-square table, the test statistic (14.72) lies between the lower (11.689) and the upper (38.076) 2.5% points of the chi-square distribution.


Therefore, we have insufficient evidence to reject the H0. It is, therefore, reasonable to conclude that the latter standard deviation value is close enough to the 15-year value.
Assume that we have 2 independent random samples of sizes n1 and n2 from \(N(\mu_1, \sigma_1^2)\) and \(N(\mu_2, \sigma_2^2)\).
Also, let us consider a scenario where we have the sample variances as \(S_1^2\) and \(S_2^2\). The basic situation usually involves the following hypothesis:
\(H_0: \ \sigma_1^2 =\sigma_2^2\)
\(H_1: \ \sigma_1^2 \neq \sigma_2^2\)
The test statistic is \(\frac {S_1^2}{S_2^2} \sim F_{n1 – 1, n2 – 1 } \text{ under } H_0\).
The decision rule is to reject the null hypothesis if the test statistic falls within the critical region of the F-distribution.

Use the following data to calculate the test statistic. Establish if the variances of the two populations “A” and “B” can be considered to be equal at the 95% confidence level.
\(\sum A^2 = 56,430\) and \(\sum B^2 = 59,520\) and \(\bar{A}= 75\) while \(\bar{B} = 77\), \(n_1 = 10\) and \(n_2 = 10\)
Solution
First, state the hypothesis
\(H_0: \ \sigma_A^2 = \sigma_B^2\)
\(H_1: \ \sigma_A^2 \neq \sigma_B^2\)
Using the formula:
$$Var(X)=s^2=\frac{1}{n-1}\left[\sum{X^2}-n\bar{X}^2\right]$$
We have:
$$ \begin{align*} S_A^2 & =\cfrac { \left\{ 56,430 – (10 × 75^2) \right\} }{9} = 20 \\ S_B^2 & =\cfrac { \left\{ 59,520 – (10 × 77^2) \right\} }{9} = 25.556 \\ \end{align*} $$
Now,
$$ \cfrac {S_A^2}{ S_B^2}=\cfrac {20}{25.556} = 0.783 $$
We should compare the test statistic with the upper and lower 2.5% points of the F-distribution. These points are 4.026 and 1/4.026 = 0.2484. Since the test statistic lies between the two limits, we have insufficient evidence against the H0. Therefore, it would be reasonable to conclude that the two samples have equal variance.
Get Ahead on Your Study Prep This Cyber Monday! Save 35% on all CFA® and FRM® Unlimited Packages. Use code CYBERMONDAY at checkout. Offer ends Dec 1st.