 # Arithmetic Mean Return Vs Geometric Mean Return

Both arithmetic return and geometric return are methods commonly used to calculate the yield on a given investment. However, the return that really matters is the geometric return, not the arithmetic return. A good understanding of the difference between the two methods of calculating returns helps analysts to invest wisely. A wise investment takes the volatility or, rather, the risk attached to an investment into account. For instance, is the return from year to year fixed or purely volatile?

## Arithmetic Mean Return

Most companies report returns in the form of an arithmetic average because it is usually the highest average that can be announced. However, the arithmetic return is actually misleading unless the return earned is fixed for the entire investment period. Two factors cause the inaccuracy:

1. the compounding of returns; and
2. the fluctuation in the percentage return earned from year to year.

#### Example: Arithmetic Mean

Assume that we have a 6-year sequence of investment returns as follows:

{40%   -30%   40%   -30%   40%   -30%}

Solution

The arithmetic mean return is simply the sum of all the returns divided by the number of returns, ‘n’ (6 in this case):

$$\text{Arithmetic mean return} =\cfrac {(0.4 – 0.3 + 0.4 – 0.3 + 0.4 – 0.3 + 0.4 – 0.3)}{6} = 0.05 \text{ or } 5\%$$

## Geometric Mean Return

To calculate the geometric mean return, we follow the steps outlined below:

1. first, add 1 to each return. The trick is to avoid problems posed by negative values;
2. multiply all the returns in the sequence;
3. raise the product to the power of 1 divided by the number of returns ‘n’; and
4. finally, subtract 1 from the final result.

#### Example: Geometric Mean

Again, assume that we have a 6-year sequence of investment returns as follows:

{40%   -30%   40%   -30%   40%   -30%}

Solution

$$\text{Geometric mean return} =(1.4 × 0.7 × 1.4 × 0.7 × 1.4 × 0.7)^{\frac {1}{6}} – 1 = -0.01 \text{ or } -1\%$$

### Arithmetic vs. Geometric Mean Returns

The media and investment institutions can mislead an investor if they incorrectly use the arithmetic return.

Considering the above example, a fund manager will most likely quote the 5% return. Unfortunately, this is not the real return! The actual return is -1% (a loss).

Perhaps you will understand the idea better if we work with actual figures.

For example, suppose you invested in an emerging mutual fund and earned 100% in the first year, followed by a 50% loss in the second year. The arithmetic mean return will be 25%, i.e., (100 – 50)/2.

Applying the geometric mean return formula in the case outlined above will give you a mean return of zero! For example, if you start with $1,000, you will have$2,000 at the end of year 1, which will be reduced to \$1,000 by the end of year 2. Thus, you earn a return of zero over the 2-year period.

In conclusion, the geometric return is always a better measure of investment performance compared to the arithmetic return, unless there is no volatility of returns. Then, the difference between the arithmetic mean return and the geometric mean return increases as the volatility increases.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep Level I
Level II
Level III
All Three Levels
Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep FRM Part I
FRM Part II
FRM Part I & Part II
Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Exam P (Probability)
Exam FM (Financial Mathematics)
Exams P & FM
Shop GMAT® Exam Prep Complete Course Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar. diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings. Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep. nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures. Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way! michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.