Repurchase Agreements (Repos)

Repurchase Agreements (Repos)

Repurchase agreements, commonly known as repos, serve as a secured method for short-term borrowing and lending. These transactions consist of a seller committing to repurchase a security at a predefined price on a future date. This operation essentially allows the seller to obtain a short-term loan collateralized by the security.

The repo transaction starts with the sale of a security and ends with its repurchase. For instance, consider a US five-year Treasury note trading at $150 million. If it’s sold today (t=0) under a 45-day repo term at an annual interest rate (repo rate) of 0.5%, the repurchase price after 45 days would be calculated as:

Assuming that there are 360 days in a year:

$$ 150\times\left[1+\left(0.5\%\times\frac{45}{360}\right)\right]=\$150.094 \text{ million} $$

The security seller effectively gets a short-term loan, collateralized by the US Treasury note. Repos can range from overnight to term repos, which have maturities longer than a day. The most common collateral is highly liquid bonds with minimal credit risk, such as sovereign bonds. A general collateral repo transaction allows a range of securities as eligible collateral.

Features and Calculations

Repos may require collateral in excess of the cash exchanged, termed as initial margin.

$$ \text{Initial margin}=\frac{\text{Initial security price}}{\text{Initial purchase price}} $$

A loan that’s backed entirely by collateral has a 100% initial margin. If the margin is greater than this, it indicates that there’s even more collateral provided initially. You can think of this extra collateral as a “haircut” or reduction to the loan in comparison to the starting value of the collateral. The equation representing this concept is:

$$
\text{Haircut} =\frac{\left(\text{Initial Security Price} – \text{Purchase Price at the start}\right)}{\text{Initial Security Price}} $$

Repos adapt to fluctuations in collateral value by allowing those involved in the contract to either ask for more collateral or give back some of what they’ve already provided. This ensures that the security interest remains consistent with the originally agreed-upon margin terms. This fluctuating margin payment, known as the variation margin, measures the gap between the current required margin and the value of the security at a specific time, which is represented in the following equation:

$$ \begin{align*} \text{Variation margin} = & (\text{Initial margin} \times \text{Purchase price at time t}) \\ – & \text{Security Price at time t}. \end{align*} $$

Uses of Repos

  1. Financing Securities: Institutions that trade or hold securities, such as banks, often use the repo market to finance their security ownership. It enables them to manage their cash flow efficiently without selling the asset.
  2. Secured Lending: From the perspective of the buyer in a repo transaction, it’s an opportunity to lend funds on a short-term basis with the added security of collateral, thus minimizing default risk.
  3. Short Selling: Some entities utilize repos to borrow securities for short selling, a strategy where the borrower believes the asset price will decrease.

Benefits of Repos

  1. Liquidity: Repos provide immediate liquidity, making them invaluable for institutions requiring short-term funds.
  2. Security: Repos are collateralized, meaning the risk of default is lower compared to unsecured loans.
  3. Flexibility: With durations ranging from overnight to longer-term, repos can cater to diverse liquidity needs.
  4. Central Bank Operations: Central banks use the repo market as a tool for implementing monetary policy, allowing them to manage liquidity in the banking system.

Factors Influencing Repo Rates

  1. Money market interest rates: Repo rates align with short-term interest rates, and central banks utilize secured repo markets to influence unsecured central bank funds rates.
  2. Collateral quality: Greater collateral risk leads to higher repo rates, with equity securities or emerging market bonds typically having higher rates compared to developed market government bonds.
  3. Repo term: Repo rates tend to rise with maturity due to higher long-term rates in normal market conditions, increasing credit risk with longer terms.
  4. Collateral uniqueness: Demand for specific securities inversely affects repo rates, with recently issued or on-the-run developed market sovereign bonds typically commanding lower rates.
  5. Collateral delivery: Repo rates are higher when cash lending is undercollateralized or no collateral is provided to the funds lender.

Risks Associated with Repos

  1. Default Risk: Despite being secured, there remains a risk of default. If a party fails to meet its obligations, the other party might suffer losses, especially if the collateral’s value has depreciated.
  2. Collateral Risk: The quality, liquidity, and value of the collateral can fluctuate. If a party defaults, the other might find it challenging to liquidate the collateral at the expected value.
  3. Margining risk: It’s crucial to ensure accurate and prompt valuation of collateral and the transfer of variation margin. This helps prevent collateral deficiencies if there’s a need to liquidate after a default. Moreover, unfavorable market situations might lead to significant shifts in collateral’s value, amplifying margin requirements and prompting more liquidations among traders.
  4. Legal risk: This pertains to the enforceability of rights within a repurchase agreement.
  5. Netting and settlement risk: This involves the capability of those involved in a repo contract to either offset the duties of a party that hasn’t defaulted and to claim either collateral or cash as a trade settlement.

Risk Management

Repo market players often involve a third party for risk management. Direct transactions between two entities are termed bilateral repos. On the other hand, triparty repos involve a third-party agent agreed upon by both main parties. The triparty agent, such as a custodian, oversees the transaction, including cash, securities, collateral valuation, and safekeeping. Triparty agents enable cost efficiencies, larger collateral pools, and access to multiple counterparties. Although the repo market is stable, it poses significant rollover and liquidity risks, especially during adverse conditions. Financial institutions must weigh the affordability of repo funding against the flexibility of pricier long-term financing methods. While repo transactions are collateralized, they’ve led to significant losses during crises due to over-reliance on repo financing by some firms.

Question #1

Assume that today (t=0) the current US ten-year Treasury note trades at a price equal to the bond’s face value of USD150,000,000. The security buyer takes delivery of the US Treasury note today and pays the security seller a purchase price based on an initial margin of 104%. The repo haircut is closest to:

  1. 0.00%
  2. 3.85%
  3. 4.00%

Solution

The correct answer is B:

The face value of the US ten-year Treasury note = USD150,000,000.

Initial margin =104%

Now, the “Purchase Price” can be found using the formula:

$$ \begin{align*} { \text{Purchase Price} } & =\frac{{\text{Security price}}}{{ \text{Initial Margin} }} \\
{\text{Purchase Price} } &=\frac{ \text{USD } 150,000,000}{1.04}=\text{USD } 144,230,769.23 \end{align*} $$

Now, the repo haircut is defined as:

$$ {\text {Haircut} }=\left(\frac{\text{Initial Security Price} {-\text{Purchase Price} }}{\text{Initial Security Price}}\right)\times100\% $$

Inserting our values:

$$ {\text{Haircut} }=\left(\frac{{\text {USD } }150,000,000-{ \text{USD } }144,230,769.23}{{ \text{USD } }150,000,000}\right)\times100\%=3.85\% $$

Question #2

Which of the following best describes the primary use of a repurchase agreement (repo) in the context of financial institutions?

  1. Hedging against exchange rate fluctuations.
  2. Financing their security ownership.
  3. Securing long-term funding for capital expenditure.

Solution

The correct answer is B:

Financial institutions often use the repo market to finance their security ownership, which enables them to manage their cash flow efficiently without selling the asset.

A is incorrect: Hedging against exchange rate fluctuations is not the primary use of repos.

C is incorrect: Repurchase agreements are primarily for short-term funding, not long-term capital expenditure.

Question #3

What are the inherent risks associated with repurchase agreements?

  1. Inflation risk, currency risk, and equity risk.
  2. Default risk, collateral risk, and legal risk.
  3. Commodities risk, strategic risk, and liquidity risk.

Solution

The correct answer is B:

Repos come with risks such as default risk (if a party fails to meet its obligations), collateral risk (related to the quality, liquidity, and value of the collateral), and legal risk (related to the enforceability of rights within a repurchase agreement).

A is incorrect: Inflation risk, currency risk, and equity risk are more general market risks and not specifically inherent to repos.

C is incorrect: While liquidity risk is a concern for the repo market, commodities risk and strategic risk aren’t primary risks associated with repurchase agreements.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.