Issuance and Trading of Government and Corporate Fixed-income Instruments

Issuance and Trading of Government and Corporate Fixed-income Instruments

Sovereign vs. Corporate Debt Issuance Process

There is a clear distinction between corporate and sovereign debt issuance processes. Corporate debt issuance tends to be opportunistic and is managed by investment bank underwriters on behalf of the issuers. On the other hand, sovereign debt typically follows the form of a public auction, often led by the National Treasury or finance ministry.

When a government announces a debt auction, it opens the door for prospective investors to place either competitive or non-competitive bids. A competitive bidder specifies both the price they are willing to pay and the number of securities they wish to acquire. Should the auction’s final price exceed the bidder’s set price, the competitive bidder walks away empty-handed. In contrast, a non-competitive bidder forgoes the price-setting privilege and agrees to whatever price the auction settles at, but with the assurance of always receiving the securities.

Competitive Bid Processes

There are two primary mechanisms for the competitive bid process: the single-price auction and the multiple-price auction. Both processes require the issuer to rank bids based on their prices. Bids are selected from the highest until the entire issuance amount has been met. In a single-price auction, each winning bidder pays an identical price and receives the same coupon rate, regardless of their initial bid. The multiple-price auction, in contrast, might result in varied prices among bidders for the same bond issue. While the single-price approach could lead to a lower cost of funds and a diverse investor base, the multiple-price auctions might end up with a concentration of large bids.

Single-price Auction Phases

  1. Announcement by the government debt management office detailing the bond issue.
  2. Submission of bids, either competitive or non-competitive, by dealers, institutional investors, and individuals.
  3. Acceptance of all non-competitive bids; ranking of competitive bids from the lowest yield. Determination of the cut-off yield.
  4. Delivery of securities to the successful bidders in exchange for proceeds.

Role of Financial Intermediaries in Sovereign Debt

Sovereign governments often appoint a group of primary dealers, financial intermediaries mandated to participate in all auctions. These primary dealers can also be counterparts for central banks in open market operations and help facilitate foreign central bank transactions. Additionally, investors might also directly participate in auctions through specific national platforms.

Trading of Sovereign vs. Corporate Debt

Sovereign debt, once issued, is primarily traded on Over-The-Counter (OTC) markets through financial intermediary brokers/dealers. However, in some places, like Australia, it is traded on exchanges. In most markets, the sovereign issuer is the primary borrower, and their securities are the most liquid in the fixed-income category. The most recent sovereign debt securities, termed “on-the-run” securities, stand out for their liquidity, making them pivotal for benchmark yield analyses. These contrast with older, less frequently traded “off-the-run” securities. Due to their high liquidity, some “on-the-run” securities are traded on electronic platforms managed by private entities.

Investors in Sovereign Debt Vs. Corporate Debt

Sovereign debts often attract investors with varying non-economic objectives. For instance, the Federal Reserve uses US Treasuries for monetary policy, while certain governments use them as dollar reserves. Some entities, like banks and insurance companies, may need to hold Treasuries to meet specific regulatory requirements. Such factors can reduce sovereign borrowing costs compared to the private sector, especially for issuers with a reserve currency. Reserve currencies are those held by central banks globally, e.g., the US dollar, Euro, pound, etc. They are used for international trade and financial transactions.

Question 1

Which category of sovereign debt securities is known for their high liquidity and is essential for benchmark yield analyses?

  1. Off-the-run securities.
  2. On-the-run securities.
  3. Exchange-traded securities.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

“On-the-run” securities are the most recent sovereign debt securities, known for their liquidity, making them pivotal for benchmark yield analyses.

A is incorrect: “Off-the-run” securities are older and less frequently traded.

C is incorrect: While some sovereign debt might be traded on exchanges (e.g., in Australia), this choice does not pertain to the liquidity and benchmarking aspect described in the notes.

Question 2

Which type of auction might result in varied prices among bidders for the same bond issue?

  1. Single-price auction.
  2. Non-competitive auction.
  3. Multiple-price auction.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

The multiple-price auction might result in varied prices among bidders for the same bond issue.

A is incorrect: In a single-price auction, all winning bidders pay the same price.

B is incorrect: Non-competitive bidders agree to pay whatever price the auction settles at; therefore, there is no variation in price among them.

Question 3

Where are most sovereign debt securities primarily traded after issuance?

  1. Stock exchanges.
  2. Over-the-counter (OTC) markets.
  3. Online public auction platforms.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Sovereign debt, once issued, is primarily traded on Over-The-Counter (OTC) markets through financial intermediary brokers/dealers.

A is incorrect: Though some sovereign debt, like in Australia, is traded on exchanges, the majority is traded OTC.

C is incorrect: Online public auction platforms might be used for issuing or buying the debt but not primarily for trading after issuance.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.