Corporate Issuer Credit Ratings
The major credit-rating agencies, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”),... Read More
Fixed-income cash flow structures determine when investors receive interest and principal payments. Contingency provisions determine whether those cash flows may change in the future. Common structures include bullet bonds, fully amortizing bonds, partially amortizing bonds, floating-rate notes, zero-coupon bonds, deferred coupon bonds, callable bonds, putable bonds, and convertible bonds.
These structures affect bond valuation, duration, reinvestment risk, interest rate sensitivity, and the allocation of benefits between issuers and investors. For CFA Level I candidates, the key is to understand how each structure changes the timing, certainty, and risk of a bond’s cash flows.
This study note explains:
Fixed-income securities differ not only in their coupon rates but also in how they repay principal and whether their cash flows can change under specific conditions. These cash flow structures directly influence bond valuation, duration, reinvestment risk, credit risk, and interest rate sensitivity.
Some bonds repay all principal at maturity, while others repay principal gradually over time. Some bonds pay fixed coupons, while others have floating, deferred, inflation-linked, or payment-in-kind structures. Bonds may also include embedded provisions that allow issuers or investors to change the timing or form of cash flows.
For CFA Level I candidates, this topic is important because cash flow structures determine how bonds are valued and how their risks are interpreted.
A U.S. Treasury bond is a common example of a bullet bond because it pays coupons during its life and repays principal at maturity.
A residential mortgage is a common example of a fully amortizing loan because each payment includes interest and principal, and the loan balance declines over time.
A commercial real estate loan may be partially amortizing because the borrower makes periodic payments but still owes a balloon payment at maturity.
A corporate floating-rate note may pay a coupon based on SOFR plus a fixed spread, allowing the coupon to adjust as market rates change.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities are examples of index-linked bonds because their principal adjusts with inflation.
Convertible bonds are often used by companies that want to offer investors potential equity upside while paying lower coupons than standard debt.
| Structure | Principal Repayment | Coupon Payments | Primary Benefit |
| Bullet Bond | At maturity | Fixed | Simple cash flow structure |
| Fully Amortizing Bond | Gradual | Fixed | Lower principal repayment risk |
| Partially Amortizing Bond | Partial payments plus balloon payment | Fixed | Lower periodic payments |
| Sinking Fund Bond | Portion retired before maturity | Usually fixed | Reduces credit risk over time |
| Floating-Rate Note | Usually at maturity | Variable | Lower interest rate risk |
| Zero-Coupon Bond | At maturity | None | Lump-sum future payment |
| Deferred Coupon Bond | Usually at maturity | Delayed | Improved issuer cash flow early on |
| Callable Bond | At maturity unless called | Usually fixed | Benefits issuer |
| Putable Bond | Investor may redeem early | Usually fixed | Benefits investor |
| Convertible Bond | May convert into equity | Usually lower coupon | Investor gains equity upside |
This table provides a quick comparison that supports both readers and AI systems.
Fixed income instruments have different cash flow structures that provide investors and issuers with various options to meet their specific financial goals, manage risks, and tailor their investments to suit their particular circumstances.
Cash flow structures matter because they determine how and when bondholders receive interest and principal. This affects a bond’s price, yield, duration, reinvestment risk, and sensitivity to interest rate changes.
For example, a bullet bond exposes investors to a large principal repayment at maturity, while a fully amortizing bond returns principal gradually over time. A callable bond gives the issuer flexibility, while a putable bond gives that flexibility to the investor.
Understanding these structures helps investors compare bonds with different risk-return profiles and is a core learning outcome in the CFA Level I fixed-income curriculum.
A standard fixed-rate bond, often termed a “Bullet Bond”, is a widely utilized debt instrument wherein the issuer receives the principal amount when the bond is issued and commits to repay that principal when the bond reaches its maturity. Throughout the bond’s duration, the issuer makes regular, fixed coupon payments to the bondholder. When the final payment consists of a lumpsum combined with the interest of the last period, it’s called a balloon payment.
One of the primary appeals of a bullet bond for both issuers, such as governments and corporations, and investors is its straightforward cash flow structure. For issuers, this bond provides a consistent and predictable financing mechanism. Investors, on the other hand, favor bullet bonds because of the guaranteed income stream via fixed coupon payments and the certainty of receiving the principal back at a set date, which can be useful for funding specific future cash flow needs.
Consider a $2,000 face value 7-year bond with an annual coupon rate of 4%. With a bullet structure, the bond’s promised payments at the end of each year would be as follows.
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Year} & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline
\textbf{PMT} & \$80 & \$80 & \$80 & \$80 & \$80 & \$80 & \$2,080 \\ \hline
\textbf{Principal} & \$2,000 & \$2,000 & \$2,000 & \$2,000 & \$2,000 & \$2,000 & \$0 \\
\textbf{remaining} & & & & & & & \end{array} $$
In the example above, every year for 6 years, the bondholder receives an interest payment of $80 (which is 4% of $2,000). At the end of the 7th year, the bondholder receives the final interest payment along with the face value of the bond, totaling $2,080.
This structure is commonly seen in bonds, where the principal amount is gradually paid off over time through a series of periodic payments. The coupon payments, representing the interest, are made regularly throughout the life of the bond. At maturity, the final principal payment is made, completing the amortization process. This structure is frequently used in corporate and government bonds to manage repayment obligations.
In the case of loans, such as mortgage loans, the cash flows consist of both interest and principal portions. Borrowers make regular payments that include both the interest accrued and a portion that reduces the principal balance. Over the life of the loan, the principal is gradually paid down until the entire debt is repaid. This structure allows borrowers to build equity while repaying the loan.
The periodic payment is calculated as follows:
$$ PMT=\frac{i\times \text{Principal}}{1-\left(1+i\right)^{-n}} $$
Where:
\(PMT\) = Periodic payment amount
\(i\) = Interest rate
\(\text{Principal}\) = Principal amount of loan or bond
\(n\) = Number of payment periods
Consider a $2,000 face value 7-year bond with an annual coupon rate of 4%. With a fully amortizing structure, the bond’s promised payments at the end of each year would be as follows.
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Year} & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline
\text{PMT} & 333.22 & 333.22 & 333.22 & 333.22 & 333.22 & 333.22 & 333.22 \\ \hline
\text{Interest} & 80.00 & 69.87 & 59.34 & 48.38 & 36.99 & 25.14 & 12.82 \\ \hline
\text{Principal} & 253.22 & 263.35 & 273.88 & 284.84 & 296.23 & 308.08 & 320.40 \\
\text{payment} & & & & & & & \\ \hline
\text{Principal} & 1,746.78 & 1,483.43 & 1,209.55 & 924.71 & 628.48 & 320.40 & -0.01 \\
\text{Remaining} & & & & & & & \\ \hline
\end{array} $$
Formula:
$$ \begin{align*} PMT & =\frac{i\times \text{Principal}}{1-\left(1+i\right)^{-n}} \\
PMT & =\frac{4\%\times2,000}{1-\left(1+4\%\right)^{-7}}=333.22 \end{align*} $$
Fixed-income securities can repay principal in different ways.
A bullet bond repays principal at maturity. A fully amortizing bond repays principal gradually until the outstanding balance reaches zero. A partially amortizing bond repays some principal over time but leaves a balloon payment at maturity. A sinking fund provision requires the issuer to retire part of the debt before maturity.
These differences affect default risk, reinvestment risk, and the timing of investor cash flows.
A partially amortizing bond is a unique financial instrument where not all the principal amount borrowed is paid off over the bond’s life. Unlike the standard bullet bond, where the full principal is repaid at maturity, in a partially amortizing bond, periodic payments are made that cover both interest and a portion of the principal. However, there remains a certain portion of the principal, referred to as the “balloon payment,” that is paid off only at the bond’s maturity.
In our previous example, if the final payment includes $800 to repay the remaining principal outstanding, the principal outstanding at the end of every year is indicated in the following table:
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Year} & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 \\ \hline
\textbf{PMT} & 231.93 & 231.93 & 231.93 & 231.93 & 231.93 & 231.93 & 231.93 \\ \hline
\textbf{Principal} & 1,848.07 & 1,690.06 & 1,525.74 & 1,354.83 & 1,177.10 & 992.25 & 0.01 \\
\textbf{Remaining} \end{array} $$
Subtracting the present value of the balloon payment from the $2,000 price of the bond gives us $1392.07 in principal repayment to amortize over 7 years to leave a remaining principal of $800 at maturity. Using this $1392.07 principal amount, we can compute the periodic payment amount as:
$$ PMT=\frac{4\%\times1392.07 }{1-\left(1+4\%\right)^{-7}}=231.93 $$
Year 1:
\(PMT\) = 231.93
Interest paid: \(4\%\times 2000 = \$80\)
Principal payment = \(231.93 – 80 = 151.93\)
Principal remaining = \(2000 – 151.93 = 1848.07\)
The last payment of $992.25 consists of the regular $231.93 payment combined with the remaining principal of $800.
A sinking fund is an arrangement predominantly used by bond issuers, including governments and select corporate entities. In this setup, issuers systematically allocate funds into a special escrow or sinking fund account. This proactive strategy is deployed to ensure they can meet their repayment obligations, thereby reducing the inherent credit risk of default. Through the sinking fund, issuers retire a predetermined amount of the bond’s principal over its lifetime. This retirement can either be executed by redeeming bonds chosen at random or by exercising the option to repurchase bonds prior to maturity at a specified price, as outlined during the bond issuance. While this strategy undeniably minimizes credit risk by ensuring funds are set aside for repayment, it introduces a layer of reinvestment risk for bondholders. This stems from the potential early retirement of bonds, compelling bondholders to possibly reinvest in securities with lower returns.
Waterfall structures are integral to the functioning of asset-backed securities (ABS) and mortgage-backed securities (MBS). Within a waterfall structure, the distribution of cash flows is organized in a hierarchical manner among various tranches or investor classes. While interest or coupon payments are generally disbursed to all tranches without any specific order, the repayment of the principal observes a defined pecking order. The tranche designated as the most senior receives its principal payment first. Upon its complete repayment, the next tranche in line begins receiving its principal, and this sequence persists until the most junior tranche is addressed.
Variable interest debt instruments, such as certain bonds and loans, adjust their interest payments based on a market reference rate (MRR) coupled with a credit spread. This dynamic structure makes them favorable for various stakeholders. For instance, financial intermediaries, especially banks, show a predilection for these assets because they conveniently align with their variable-rate liabilities. Moreover, floating-rate notes (FRN), another form of this debt, are especially attractive to investors keen on capitalizing on rising interest rates. A simple mathematical representation to determine the FRN coupon is: \(\text{FRN coupon} = \text{MRR} + \text{Credit spread}.\)
While these variable-rate instruments have been designed to reduce interest rate risk—given that their coupon payments are modulated with fluctuating interest rates—they are not free of risks. Credit risk remains a concern. If there’s a perceived decline in an issuer’s credit quality, irrespective of the MRR’s status, the instrument’s price may plummet.
Beyond the regular adjustments based on MRR, these instruments come with various innovative features:
Leveraged loans, typically extended to issuers perceived as lower credit quality, have their own set of dynamics. The coupon rate, for example, may surge if the issuer’s credit quality takes a hit. This surge ensures that investors are compensated with a higher yield. A case in point is the Antelas AG scenario, where a loan’s credit spread might be recalibrated based on specific financial ratios.
Certain issuers, wary of future cash flow challenges, might opt for the PIK feature in their loans or bonds. This unique feature allows these issuers to pay interest by augmenting the bond or loan principal instead of traditional cash payments. Notably, this arrangement is more prevalent among firms that are heavily reliant on debt.
The financial world is becoming increasingly conscious of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. Responding to this trend, bonds with provisions related to ESG have emerged. A prominent example is the sustainability-linked bond issued by the Public Power Corporation. Here, bonds might undergo step-up margins if they don’t meet certain ESG benchmarks.
Index-linked bonds offer another layer of sophistication. Their payments are tethered to specific indices. The most prevalent among these are the inflation-linked bonds, colloquially known as ‘linkers’. Their primary function is to act as a shield against inflation, offering stakeholders inflation-adjusted cash flows. A widely recognized example is the U.S.’s Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), which modulate their cash flows based on inflation metrics like the Consumer Price Index.
These fixed-income instruments do not make regular interest payments like traditional bonds. Instead, they are sold at a discount to their face value and do not provide periodic income. Investors earn their return by purchasing the bonds at a discount and receiving the full face value at maturity. Zero-coupon bonds are often used in situations where investors are seeking a predictable lump sum payout in the future.
This structure includes bonds that have a deferred coupon payment, meaning they do not pay interest for a specified initial period. After the deferral period, the bond starts making regular coupon payments that are typically higher than the market rate to compensate for the earlier period without interest. This structure is commonly utilized in projects or financial instruments where cash flows are expected to be limited in the early stages, such as infrastructure projects or issuances from entities with lower credit quality.
Bond coupon structures determine how interest payments are made.
Fixed-rate bonds pay a constant coupon. Floating-rate bonds reset coupons based on a reference rate. Zero-coupon bonds make no periodic interest payments and are issued at a discount. Deferred coupon bonds delay coupon payments until a later date. Payment-in-kind bonds allow issuers to pay interest with additional debt rather than cash.
These structures are important because they change the timing and certainty of cash flows received by investors.
Bonds often come with certain conditional provisions known as contingency provisions. These provisions dictate actions that may be taken contingent upon specific events. They embed within the bond contract the rights but not obligations to undertake certain actions. Depending on their nature, these provisions can either add value to the issuer or the bondholder. Among the numerous types of bonds with such embedded options are callable, putable, and convertible bonds.
These bonds predominantly favor the issuer, as they provide the issuer the right to redeem or “call” the bond before its maturity. The underlying motivation is protection against falling interest rates. By doing so, the issuer can replace an old bond with a higher interest rate with a new bond with a potentially lower interest rate, thus reducing its borrowing cost. This presents reinvestment risks for the investor since if interest rates fall, the issuer is more likely to call the bond, meaning the investor may then have to reinvest in a lower-yielding environment. To compensate for this risk, callable bonds generally offer a higher yield.
The call protection period also referred to as the lockout period or cushion, represents the initial period during which the issuer cannot call the bond. This protection incentivizes investors by offering them some security against early redemption.
There’s also a unique callable bond variant called a make-whole call. This is where the issuer makes a payment determined by the present value of future coupons, making early redemption significantly more expensive.
While callable bonds cater to issuers, putable bonds cater to bondholders. These bonds grant bondholders the right to “put” or sell the bond back to the issuer at predetermined prices on specified dates. This is particularly advantageous if interest rates spike, as bondholders can then liquidate the bond and reinvest the proceeds at higher yields. Consequently, putable bonds often fetch a higher price compared to regular bonds.
Blurring the lines between debt and equity, convertible bonds offer bondholders a choice: they can either hold onto the bond or convert it into a predetermined number of common shares of the issuing company. This dual feature—bond downside protection and potential equity upside—makes convertibles relatively attractive, thus often garnering a higher price.
An alternative to convertibility is the inclusion of warrants. Unlike the embedded nature of the convertible option, a warrant is an additional, separable option that grants the holder the right to purchase shares at a given price within a set timeframe. Warrants can make bonds more appealing, especially for younger firms. They offer the potential for additional returns if the company’s shares are appreciated.
Lastly, there’s a unique bond variant known as Contingent Convertible Bonds or CoCos. Primarily issued by some European banks, these bonds automatically convert from debt to equity upon the occurrence of specific events, as the issuer’s equity drops below a particular level.
Some bonds include embedded options that give either the issuer or investor the right to change future cash flows.
Callable bonds give issuers the right to redeem bonds before maturity. Putable bonds give investors the right to sell bonds back to the issuer before maturity. Convertible bonds give investors the right to convert debt into equity.
Remember:
These provisions affect bond pricing because they change the uncertainty and value of future cash flows.
Candidates are frequently tested on the differences between major bond cash flow structures and embedded provisions.
Remember:
A common CFA exam question may ask which party benefits from a contingency provision. If the issuer can act, the feature usually benefits the issuer. If the investor can act, the feature usually benefits the investor.
Question #1
Calculate the periodic payment and the interest and principal components of the first payment for a fully amortizing bond based on the following:
- Loan amount: $15 million
- Annual interest rate: 3.5%
- Loan term: 8 semiannual periods (4 years)
Solution:
Formula:
$$ PMT=\frac{i\times {\text{Principal} }}{1-(1+i)^{-n}} $$
Where
- \(i=\frac {(3.5\%)}{2}=1.75\%\)
- Principal =$15 million
- n=8
Solve for the periodic payment as follows:
$$ PMT=\frac{0.0175\times15}{1-(1.0175)^{-8}}=\$2.026 \text{ Million} $$
The initial $2.026 Million periodic payment comprises the following:
- Initial interest payment: \(\$15 \times 1.75\% = \$0.2625 \text{ million}\)
- Initial principal repayment: =\(\$2.026 \text{ Million} – \$0.2625 \text{ million} =\$1.7635 \text{ million}\)
Question #2
Which bond structure involves periodic payments that cover both interest and a portion of the principal, but not all of the principal amount is paid off over the bond’s life?
- Bullet Bond
- Fully Amortizing Bond
- Partially Amortizing Bond
Solution
The correct Answer is C.
A partially amortizing bond includes periodic payments that cover both interest and some of the principal, leaving a portion of the principal, known as a “balloon payment,” to be paid off at maturity.
A is incorrect: A bullet bond involves only interest payments throughout its life with the full principal returned at maturity.
B is incorrect: A fully amortizing bond involves periodic payments that cover both interest and principal such that the entire principal is paid off by maturity.
Question #3
For which bond structure are funds allocated into a special account to ensure repayment obligations and reduce credit risk?
- Amortizing Principal
- Sinking funds
- Waterfall Structures
Solution
The correct answer is B.
Sinking funds are provisions used by bond issuers to systematically allocate money into a special account. This strategy is used to ensure that they can meet their repayment obligations, reducing the credit risk of default.
A is incorrect: Amortizing principal’s structure involves the gradual repayment of principal over the bond’s life.
C is incorrect: Waterfall Structures relate to the hierarchical distribution of cash flows among various tranches or investor classes in asset-backed securities.
Bullet Bond — A bond that pays periodic coupons and repays principal at maturity.
Fully Amortizing Bond — A bond or loan that repays all principal gradually over its life.
Partially Amortizing Bond — A bond or loan that repays part of the principal over time and leaves a balloon payment at maturity.
Balloon Payment — A large final principal payment due at maturity.
Sinking Fund — A provision requiring the issuer to retire part of the bond issue before maturity.
Floating-Rate Note — A bond whose coupon resets periodically based on a reference rate.
Payment-in-Kind Bond — A bond that allows interest to be paid with additional debt instead of cash.
Zero-Coupon Bond — A bond that makes no periodic coupon payments and is issued at a discount.
Deferred Coupon Bond — A bond that delays coupon payments until a later date.
Callable Bond — A bond that gives the issuer the right to redeem it before maturity.
Putable Bond — A bond that gives the investor the right to sell it back to the issuer before maturity.
Convertible Bond — A bond that gives investors the right to convert the bond into equity.
Contingent Convertible Bond — A bond that converts into equity when a specified trigger event occurs.
What is a bullet bond?
A bullet bond is a bond that pays periodic coupons and repays the full principal amount at maturity.
What is the difference between a fully amortizing and partially amortizing bond?
A fully amortizing bond repays all principal gradually over time. A partially amortizing bond repays only part of the principal before maturity and leaves a balloon payment.
What is a sinking fund provision?
A sinking fund provision requires the issuer to retire part of the bond issue before maturity.
What is a floating-rate bond?
A floating-rate bond pays a coupon that resets periodically based on a reference rate plus a spread.
What is a payment-in-kind bond?
A payment-in-kind bond allows the issuer to pay interest using additional debt rather than cash.
What is a zero-coupon bond?
A zero-coupon bond makes no periodic coupon payments and is issued at a discount to par value.
Why do issuers issue callable bonds?
Issuers use callable bonds because they provide flexibility to redeem debt early, often when interest rates fall.
Why do investors prefer putable bonds?
Investors may prefer putable bonds because they can sell the bond back to the issuer before maturity under specified conditions.
What is a convertible bond?
A convertible bond gives the investor the right to convert the bond into a specified number of shares.
What is a contingent convertible bond?
A contingent convertible bond converts into equity when a specified trigger event occurs, often linked to the issuer’s capital position.
Fixed-income cash flow structures determine when bondholders receive interest and principal. Bullet bonds repay principal at maturity, amortizing bonds repay principal gradually, and sinking fund bonds require partial principal retirement before maturity.
Coupon structures may be fixed, floating, deferred, zero-coupon, index-linked, or payment-in-kind. Contingency provisions such as callable, putable, and convertible features change the rights of issuers and investors.
For CFA Level I candidates, the key is to understand how each structure affects cash flow timing, bond pricing, interest rate risk, reinvestment risk, and the party that benefits from each provision.
Get Ahead on Your Study Prep This Cyber Monday! Save 35% on all CFA® and FRM® Unlimited Packages. Use code CYBERMONDAY at checkout. Offer ends Dec 1st.