Bond Indentures and Covenants

Bond Indentures and Covenants

Bond Indentures

A bond indenture is a legal contract that outlines the bond issuer’s obligations and bondholders’ rights. It is also known as a trust deed, and in regions like the United States and Canada, it’s often referred to as the bond indenture. This contract lays the groundwork for all subsequent transactions between the bondholder and the issuer. Beyond defining the issuer’s obligations and restrictions, the bond indenture also details the bond’s features. It pinpoints the issuer’s sources of repayment, commitments made to bondholders, and provisions that enhance the issuer’s capacity to fulfill its debt obligations in full.

Sources of Repayment

Repayment sources for bonds differ based on the issuer. National governments often leverage their sovereign right to tax economic activities. In contrast, local or regional governments might derive repayment funds from taxation or fees associated with infrastructure projects. Corporate bond investors predominantly depend on the firm’s operating cash flows. Meanwhile, Asset-backed securities (ABS) are anchored in the cash flows generated from a collection of loans or receivables held by a designated special-purpose issuer.

Bond Covenants

Covenants are provisions in the bond indenture. They are legally enforceable rules that borrowers and lenders agree upon when a bond is issued.

Negative Covenants (Restrictions)

Negative covenants, often referred to as restrictions, primarily aim to safeguard the interests of bondholders. They act as preventive measures, ensuring that the issuing firm refrains from actions that could escalate the risk of default. Examples of such covenants include restrictions on asset sales, negative pledges of collateral, limitations on further borrowings, and constraints on investments, disposal of assets, or the issuance of debt that is senior to existing obligations.

Affirmative Covenants (Promises)

Affirmative covenants, also known as promises, involve commitments that the borrower pledges to fulfill. Unlike negative covenants, these typically don’t restrict the issuer’s day-to-day decisions. Examples include making timely interest and principal payments to bondholders, maintaining assets, complying with laws and regulations, using bond proceeds appropriately, providing financial reports promptly, allowing bondholders the option to redeem bonds at a premium during an acquisition, and including clauses like pari passu, ensuring equal treatment of debt obligations. Another significant affirmative covenant is the cross-default clause, indicating a default if the issuer defaults on any other debt obligation.

Contrasting Affirmative and Negative Covenants

Affirmative Covenants are actions that the borrower promises to perform. They are typically administrative in nature and do not usually impose additional costs on an issuer nor materially constrain the issuer’s discretion in operating its business. On the other hand, negative covenants are prohibitions on the borrower. They are designed to protect bondholders by preventing the issuer from taking certain actions that might increase the risk of default. However, they should not be so restrictive that they hinder the issuer from capitalizing on opportunities or adapting to changing business circumstances.

Question #1

What is the primary purpose of a bond indenture?

  1. To specify the bond’s features and identify the issuer’s sources of repayment.
  2. To provide a detailed history of the issuer’s past financial performance.
  3. To outline the voting rights of bondholders in the issuer’s annual general meeting.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

A bond indenture is a legal contract that outlines the bond issuer’s obligations and the bondholders’ rights. It specifies the bond’s features, the issuer’s sources of repayment, and other commitments and provisions.

B is incorrect: The bond indenture does not provide a detailed history of the issuer’s past financial performance; it focuses on the terms and conditions of the bond.

C is incorrect: Bondholders typically do not have voting rights in the issuer’s annual general meeting; that privilege is reserved for equity shareholders.

Question #2

Which of the following is least likely a source of bond repayment?

  1. Operating cash flows of the firm for corporate bonds.
  2. Fees from infrastructure projects for local governments.
  3. Dividends from equity shares.

The correct answer is C. Dividends from equity shares are returns to equity shareholders and are not a source of bond repayment.

A is incorrect: Investors in corporate bonds rely on the operating the firm’s cash flows as their primary source for interest and principal payments.

B is incorrect: Local or regional governments may use fees from infrastructure projects as a source of bond repayment.

Question #3

Which of the following is most likely the primary role of negative covenants in a bond indenture?

  1. To specify actions that the borrower promises to perform.
  2. To ensure that an issuer maintains the ability to make interest and principal payments.
  3. To provide bondholders with voting rights in the issuer’s decisions.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Negative covenants are prohibitions on the borrower. They are designed to protect bondholders by preventing the issuer from taking certain actions that might increase the risk of default.

A is incorrect: This describes affirmative covenants, which specify actions the borrower promises to perform.

C is incorrect: Bondholders typically do not have voting rights in the issuer’s decisions; that privilege is reserved for equity shareholders.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.