Financial Ratios in Corporate Credit Analysis

Financial Ratios in Corporate Credit Analysis

Financial ratios derived from quantitative factors enable credit analysts to gauge a company’s financial health, spot trends, and conduct comparisons within and across sectors. The focus is primarily on three critical areas: profitability, coverage, and leverage.

Profitability Ratios

EBIT Margin

It assesses a company’s operational efficiency before considering capital costs and taxes.

\[\text{EBIT Margin } = \frac{\text{ Operating Income }}{\text{ Revenue }}\]

A high EBIT margin suggests that a larger portion of sales revenue remains after paying for variable costs of production, indicating good profitability.

Coverage Ratios

EBIT to Interest Expense

This metric measures a company’s ability to cover its interest obligations using its operating profit.

\[\text{EBIT to Interest Expense } = \frac{\text{ Operating Income }}{\text{ Interest Expense }}\]

A higher value suggests that the company can easily meet its interest obligations from its operating profit, indicating lower credit risk.

Leverage Ratios

Debt to EBITDA

It evaluates the company’s leverage by comparing its total debt to its overall operating performance.

\[\text{Debt to EBITDA } = \frac{\text{ Debt }}{\text{ }\text{EBITDA}\text{ }}\]

A higher Debt to EBITDA is a red flag, indicating a higher degree of financial risk.

RCF to Net Debt

Assesses leverage by comparing cash retained in the business to net debt.

\[RCF\text{ to Net Debt } = \frac{\text{ Retained Cash Flow }(RCF)}{\text{ Debt } – \text{ Cash and Marketable Securi}\text{ties}\text{ }}\]

A higher RCF to Net Debt suggests the firm has retained more cash relative to its net debt, pointing toward better financial stability.

Cash Flow Measures

Cash flow measures such as Free Cash Flow (FCF), Funds From Operations (FFO), and Retained Cash Flow (RCF) are often used in credit analysis. They emphasize cash flows from operations over those from asset sales or financing. Some cash flow measures Include:

  1. Free Cash Flow (FCF): Net income minus necessary investments in working capital and fixed assets and net interest paid.
  2. Funds from Operations (FFO): Net income with added back non-cash expenses.
  3. Retained Cash Flow (RCF): Operational cash flow minus dividends.

These measures are conservative because they adjust for cash used in core business activities or distributed to shareholders.

Additional Considerations

Debt and interest measures might undergo adjustments to account for operational leases or other fixed commitments, not on the balance sheet. The concepts and definitions provided for these ratios are among several usages and may not have official IFRS definitions.

Example: Credit Analysis

A credit analyst is evaluating the financial health of AlphaTech Inc. The company’s financials are given in the following table:

$$\begin{array}{l|c}
\textbf{Metric} & \textbf{Amount (\$ in millions)} \\
\hline
\text{Operating Income (EBIT)} & 50 \\
\hline
\text{Revenue} & 200 \\
\hline
\text{Interest Expense} & 10 \\
\hline
\text{Total Debt} & 150 \\
\hline
\text{EBITDA} & 70 \\
\hline
\text{Cash and Marketable Securities} & 30 \\
\hline
\text{Dividends} & 5 \\
\end{array}$$

Profitability Ratios

EBIT Margin \(= \frac{\text{Operating Income}}{\text{Revenue}} = \frac{50}{200} = 0.25\) or \(25\%\)

With an EBIT Margin of 25%, AlphaTech Inc. retains $0.25 for every dollar of revenue after covering variable production costs. This is a strong profitability indicator.

Coverage Ratios

EBIT to Interest Expense \(= \frac{\text{Operating Income}}{\text{Interest Expense}} = \frac{50}{10} = 5\)

An EBIT to Interest Expense ratio of 5 indicates that AlphaTech can cover its interest expense 5 times over with its operating profit, implying lower credit risk.

Leverage Ratios

Debt to EBITDA:

\[\text{Debt to EBITDA} = \frac{\text{Debt}}{\text{EBITDA}} = \frac{150}{70} = 2.14\]

The Debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.14 suggests that AlphaTech’s debt is slightly over twice its operational performance. A higher value here would be concerning.

RCF to Net Debt:

\(RCF\) (Net cash from operations – Dividends) \(= 50 – 5 = 45\)

Net Debt \(=\) Debt – Cash and Marketable Securities \(= 150 – 30 = 120\)

\[RCF\text{ to Net Debt} = \frac{RCF}{\text{Net Debt}} = \frac{45}{120} = 0.375\text{ or }37.5\%\]

The RCF to Net Debt ratio of 37.5% indicates that the company retains cash, equating to 37.5% of its net debt, which is a positive sign of financial stability.

Question

Company A and Company B operate in the same industry.

$$\begin{array}{l|c|c}
& \textbf{Company A} & \textbf{Company B} \\
\hline
\text{EBITDA margin} & 20\% & 18\% \\
\hline
\text{FCF} & (-15) & 10 \\
\hline
\text{FCF before dividends} & (-10) & 5 \\
\hline
\text{Debt/EBITDA} & 3.0 & 2.0 \\
\hline
\text{EBITDA/interest expense} & 2.5 & 3.0 \\
\end{array}$$

Based on the financial information above, which of the following statements Is most likely correct?

  1. Company A has a lower credit risk than Company B.
  2. Company B has a lower credit risk than Company A.
  3. Both companies have the same credit risk.

The correct answer is B.

  1. EBITDA margin: Company A has a higher EBITDA margin (20% vs. 18%), suggesting it is more profitable.
  2. FCF: Company B has a positive FCF of 10, while Company A has a negative FCF of (15). This indicates that Company B is in a better cash flow position.
  3. FCF before dividends: Company B also has a better position here with 5 compared to Company A’s (10).
  4. Debt/EBITDA: Company B has a lower Debt/EBITDA ratio (2.0 vs. 3.0), suggesting it is less leveraged and, therefore, potentially less risky.
  5. EBITDA/interest expense: Company B has a higher EBITDA/interest expense ratio (3.0 vs. 2.5), meaning it is better positioned to cover its interest expenses with its earnings.

Based on the evaluation: Company A has a higher EBITDA margin, but this advantage is offset by its negative FCF, higher leverage, and lower interest coverage. Company B has positive FCF, better FCF before dividends, lower leverage, and better interest coverage.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.