Empirical Vs. Analytical Duration

Empirical Vs. Analytical Duration

Analytical duration utilizes mathematical models, assuming credit spreads and government bond yields are uncorrelated and independent. It is a solid method for estimating the bond’s price-yield relationship in numerous situations. On the other hand, empirical duration relies on historical data within statistical frameworks, factoring in elements influencing bond prices. It recognizes the correlations between credit spreads and benchmark yields, enhancing its precision in specific contexts. It becomes particularly relevant during periods of economic unrest, like financial crises when the relationship between bond yields and spreads becomes more complex.

Summary of the Important Duration Measures and their Significance

  • Approximate Modified Duration: It is an approach based on yield that estimates the slope of a bond’s price-yield curve. It estimates the modified duration of a bond.
  • Effective Duration: It is a curve-based method used to estimate a bond’s price sensitivity to a change in a benchmark yield curve. It estimates the modified duration for complex bonds whose cashflows are uncertain.
  • Key Rate: It measures the sensitivity of a bond’s price to changes in interest rates at specific points along the yield curve. It measures the sensitivity of a bond’s price to non-parallel shifts in the benchmark yield curve.
  • Empirical Duration: Statistical estimate that considers the correlation between yield spreads and benchmark yield changes across different economic scenarios.

Flight to Quality

In times of economic uncertainty, investors often shift from risky assets to secure ones, like government bonds. This can lead to a decline in government benchmark yields and widening credit spreads. During crises like COVID-19, “flight to quality” can cause government benchmark yields to fall while credit spreads widen.

Empirical vs. Analytical Duration: Practical Implications

For government bonds with minimal credit risk, analytical and empirical durations are similar. On the other hand, for corporate bonds, especially during market downturns, empirical duration is more relevant because of the negative correlation between benchmark yields and credit spreads.

Analysts must weigh the interplay between benchmark yields and credit spreads when determining which duration type to employ, ensuring accurate bond price predictions in varied economic contexts.

Question

In which scenario would empirical duration most likely provide more accurate estimates than analytical duration?

  1. For government bonds with low credit risk during stable economic conditions.
  2. For corporate bonds during periods of economic volatility where there’s a “flight to quality.”
  3. For bonds when, government bond yields and credit spreads are perfectly positively correlated.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

For corporate bonds during periods of economic volatility where there’s a “flight to quality.”

A is incorrect. For government bonds with low credit risk, analytical and empirical durations are expected to provide similar estimates, especially in stable economic conditions.

C is incorrect. The situation described is not typical; during periods like economic crises, credit spreads and benchmark yields tend to be negatively correlated.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.