Limited Time Offer: Save 10% on all 2022 Premium Study Packages with promo code: BLOG10

Corporate Issuer Credit Ratings

Corporate Issuer Credit Ratings

The major credit-rating agencies, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), and Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), play an essential role in the credit markets. For a majority of bonds, at least two of the agencies provide ratings.

Credit rating agencies use similar symbol-based ratings to assess the risk of default. There are symbols for investment grade and non-investment grade (“junk” or “high-yield” bonds), including low-grade (or speculative-grade) and default.

Issuer Ratings versus Issue Ratings

When assessing corporate debt, rating agencies typically provide both an issuer rating (corporate family rating, CFR) and an issue rating (corporate credit rating, CCR).

The issuer’s credit rating addresses the issuer’s overall creditworthiness and usually applies to senior unsecured debt.

Issue rating refers to specific financial obligations and considers ranking in the capital structure such as secured or subordinated. However, cross-default provisions, which refer to events of default such as nonpayment of interest on one bond triggering default on all outstanding debt, may often suggest the same default probability for all issues.

Notching

A rating adjustment methodology known as “notching” may assign different credit ratings based on the priority of claims. Thus, with varying degrees of losses in the event of default, obligations are subject to being notched higher or lower.

Rating agencies consider structural subordination, which can arise when a corporation with a holding company structure has debt at both its parent holding company and operating subsidiaries. Debt at the subsidiary level could be serviced before funds are passed (“upstreamed”) to the holding company. Based on such payment priorities, rating agencies often adopt a notching. This process allows credit ratings on issues to be moved up or down from the issuer rating.

Question

Which of the following rating methodologies only apply to subordinated debt?

  1. Notching.
  2. Issue rating.
  3. Issuer rating.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

The issuer’s credit rating addresses the issuer’s overall creditworthiness and usually applies to senior unsecured debt.

A is incorrect. Issue rating ranks all other types of debts.

B is incorrect. Notching is a rating adjustment methodology that assigns different credit ratings based on the priority of claim.

 

 

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.