Management Motivations for Low-quality Financial Reporting

Management Motivations for Low-quality Financial Reporting

Several reasons would lead a company’s management to issue low-quality financial reports. However, the prevalence of this practice is mitigated by the existence of a robust regulatory regime that disciplines financial reporting quality.

Management Motivations for Low-quality Financial Reporting

The main motivations behind the issuance of low-quality financial reports by company management include the following:

  • Hiding poor performance, such as loss of market share or low profitability. This usually arises from:
    • The desire to meet or beat market expectations is reflected in analysts’ or management’s forecasts. Such forecasts usually lead to an increase in stock price and management compensation that is linked to stock or earnings performance; or
    • Concerns over career and incentive compensation. For example, a manager may be worried that a poorly performing company may limit his future career opportunities or that he may not receive a bonus based on exceeding an earnings target.
  • Avoidance of debt covenant violations. This can make managers inflate earnings and is particularly important for highly leveraged and unprofitable companies.

The decision to issue low-quality financial reports ultimately lies in the hands of individuals. For these individuals, namely managers, to succeed, the conditions must be convenient.

Conducive Conditions for Issuing Low-quality Financial Reports

The issuance of low-quality financial reports is subject to three conditions.

These are:

  1. Opportunity: this may be presented either by internal or external factors. Internal factors include poor internal controls or an ineffective board of directors. External conditions include the use of accounting standards that provide scope for divergent choices or minor consequences for making inappropriate choices.
  2. Motivation: this can result from the pressure on a manager to meet specific criteria either for personal gratification, such as receipt of a bonus or for corporate reasons, such as concerns about future financing.
  3. Rationalization: when concerned about whether a choice is correct, an individual will use rationalization to justify the choice to themselves.

Question #1

Which of the following is least likely a motivating factor behind managers’ decision to deliberately issue low-quality financial reports?

  1. The desire to get higher compensation.
  2. The desire to avoid violating debt covenants.
  3. The desire to report poor financial performance.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

Managers will issue financial reports of poor quality, i.e., increase revenues or reduce the cost of sales, to hide poor financial performance.

A and B are incorrect. They motivate managers to issue low-quality financial reports.

Question #2

A possible motivation for a manager to issue low-quality financial reports could be:

  1. The manager’s poor administrative skills.
  2. The manager’s compensation is tied to stock price performance.
  3. The manager’s willingness to increase the market share of products significantly.

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Tying a manager’s cash compensation to the company’s earnings will motivate them to issue low-quality financial reports.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.