Analyze and Intperret Financial Statement Disclosures

Analyze and Intperret Financial Statement Disclosures

Users of financial statements can use financial statement disclosures to deepen their understanding of a company’s investments in tangible and intangible assets.  Financial statement disclosures divulge such details as how those investments have changed during a reporting period, how the changes have affected the company’s current financial performance, and the implications the changes might have on the expected future performance of the company.

Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statement Disclosures Relating to Property, Plant, Equipment, and Intangible Assets

Financial statement disclosures can be used to compute various financial ratios. The ratios can be useful in the analysis of aspects of fixed assets such as the fixed asset turnover ratio and several asset age ratios.

The fixed asset turnover ratio, which is computed by dividing total revenue by average net fixed assets, reflects the relationship between total revenues and investment in property, plant, and equipment (PPE). The higher the ratio, the more sales a company can generate with a given amount of investment in fixed assets.

Asset age ratios rely on the relationship between historical cost and depreciation. The asset age, and remaining useful life ratios, are two significant indicators of a company’s need to reinvest in its production capacity. The older the assets and the shorter the remaining useful life, the more a company may need to reinvest to maintain production capacity.

The average age of a company’s asset base can be estimated as accumulated depreciation divided by depreciation expense.  And to estimate the average remaining life of a company’s asset base, the net PPE is divided by depreciation expense.

Comparing a company’s annual capital expenditures to its annual depreciation expense can also indicate whether or not the company’s production capacity is being maintained. It acts as a very general indicator of the rate at which a company is replacing its PPE relative to the PPE depreciation rate.

Question 1

Assuming that the historical cost of PPE for companies ABC and XYZ are the same, and the companies use the same depreciation method, consider the following information on their PPE:

$$ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{Estimates} & \textbf{Company ABC} & \textbf{Company XYZ} \\ \hline
{\text{Estimated total useful life }(\text{years}) } & {10.4} & {21.3} \\\hline
{\text{Estimated age }(\text{years}) } & {5.7} & {11.0} \\\hline
{\text{Estimated remaining life }(\text{years}) } & {4.7} & {9.4} \\\hline
\end{array}
$$

Which of the following statements is the least accurate?

  1. The estimates suggest that more than 50% of each company’s useful life has passed.
  2. The estimated age of the equipment suggests that company ABC has newer PPE than company XYZ.
  3. The estimated total useful life suggests that company XYZ depreciates PPE over a much shorter period than company ABC.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

The estimated total useful life suggests that company ABC depreciates PPE over a much longer (not shorter) period than company XYZ. The estimated total useful life of PPE is total historical cost of PPE divided by annual depreciation expense. If the historical cost of both companies’ PPE is the same, and they use the same depreciation method, then the company with the lower estimated total useful life – company ABC – must have a higher depreciation expense which would stem from the choice to depreciate PPE over a shorter period of time than company XYZ.

Question 2

XYZ company follows a straight line depreciation method, and reports the information below for its production machines:

annual depreciation expense: $50,000;

accumulated depreciation expense: $200,000;

carrying value: $650,000.

What is the estimated remaining useful life of the machines and for how long has the company held them?

  1. The remaining useful life is 5 years and the company has held the machines for 3 years.
  2. The remaining useful life is 8 years and the company has held the machines for 4 years.
  3. The remaining useful life is 13 years and the company has held the machines for 4 years.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

Remaining useful life = Asset’s carrying value/Annual depreciation expense = $650,000/$50,000 = 13 years

Asset’s holding period = Accumulated depreciation expense/Annual depreciation expense = $200,000/$50,000 = 4 years

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.