Standard I(D) – Misconduct

Standard I(D) – Misconduct

Standard I(D) – Misconduct addresses issues of honesty vs. deceit. It indicates that CFA members must not compromise their reputation, integrity, or competence. Standard I(D) – Misconduct contrasts with Standard 1(A) – Knowledge of the Law in that Standard 1(A) addresses applicable laws, and 1(D) is concerned with all behavior that could impact professional integrity.

Compliance

Preservation of integrity covers a broad scope of behavior.  It can be interpreted as refraining from drinking alcohol during business hours and conducting due diligence related to recommendations. Any and all behaviors that upset a member’s integrity or threaten the reputation of CFA Institute should be called into question. Therefore, whether the perception of misconduct relates to social behavior or professional competence, CFA members must hold themselves to the highest management standard.

Standard, I(D) covers conduct during normal business hours and in cases that a CFA member participates in financial services to charities or other non-profit organizations.  For example, an investment professional may volunteer to serve a charity by negotiating the purchase of capital equipment. In doing so, if (s)he pays the overall purchase price to compensate for time and trouble, without express permission to do so, then it can be viewed in the light of Standard I(D) – Misconduct.

Violation

Standard I(D) – Misconduct expressly communicates that following the CFA Code of Standards to the letter is insufficient.  Members must also hold themselves to high moral ideals by complying with the spirit of CFA Ethics and Standards.

A common concern related to misconduct is professional expenses.  For example, an employee may augment expense receipts for client meetings, insurance reimbursement, or travel costs.  All of these requests for expense payments would be considered an intent to defraud and, therefore, are a violation of Standard I(D) – Misconduct.

Question

Which of the following is least likely a violation of Standard I(D) – Misconduct?

I. Being intoxicated at the office

II. Being convicted of misdemeanor public nuisance over a holiday weekend

A. I only

B. II only

C. None of the above

Solution

The correct answer is B.

According to Standard I(D) “Members shall not engage in any professional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or commit any act that reflects adversely on their professional reputation, integrity, or competence.” The standard is not intended to regulate one’s personal behavior. Therefore, conviction of a misdemeanor public nuisance could be considered a passable act, not in violation of Standard I(D) – Misconduct.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.