Save 30% on all 2023 Study Packages with Code: BLACKFRIDAY30. Valid until Nov. 28th.

# Gross Domestic Product Using Expenditure and Income Approaches

The aggregate output of an economy is the value of all the goods and services produced within a predetermined period of time. On the other hand, aggregate income refers to the economic value of all payments received by the suppliers of the factors of production of goods and services.

## Approaches for Calculating GDP

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has two different approaches: the income approach and the expenditure (or output) approach. In the case of the income approach, GDP refers to the aggregate income earned by all households, companies, and the government that operate within an economy over a given period of time.

In the expenditure (or output) approach, GDP refers to the market value of all final goods and services produced in an economy over a given period of time. Intuitively, GDP calculates how income and output flow in an economy.

Naturally, the results obtained by the income approach must be equal to those obtained by the output approach.

## Income Approach

Here, GDP can be calculated by taking the total amount earned by every household, company, and all firms in the economy. It’s possible to express the income approach formula to GDP as follows:

GDP = Total national income + Sales taxes + Depreciation + Net foreign factor income

Where:

Total national income is equal to the sum of all wages plus rents plus interest and profits; and

Net foreign factor income is the difference between foreign payments to domestic citizens and domestic income payments to foreign citizens.

## Expenditure Approach

In this approach, GDP must be calculated by taking the total amount spent on goods and services that have been produced in the economy within a given period of time.

In the expenditure approach, there are two measurement methods used to calculate GDP. The first uses the value of final outputs, and the other method uses the sum of value-added.

Usually, the formula used is:

GDP = Gross private consumption expenditures (C) + Gross private investment (I) + Government purchases (G) + Exports (X) – Imports (M)

### Criteria for Measuring Gross Domestic Product

The first criterion states that all goods and services included in the calculation must have been produced in the economy and during the period of measurement. Therefore, goods produced in the previous periods should not be included in the calculation. Moreover, transfer payments made by the government should also be excluded from the calculation. Usually, this could be in the form of compensations or welfare benefits.

Secondly, goods and services included in the calculation should only be those whose values can be determined by selling them in the market. As a result, this makes it possible for the price of supplied goods and services to be well determined.

Lastly, the calculation of GDP only includes the market value of final goods and services. Final goods are those that are not resold, as opposed to intermediate goods. An alternative approach to calculating GDP is by summing all the value-added during the production and distribution process.

### Example of GDP Using the Expenditure Approach

The best example is that of a wheat farmer. This farmer sells one kilogram of his wheat to a miller at $0.21. The miller sells it to the baker at$0.49. The baker bakes bread and sells it to a retailer at $0.92. Consequently, the retailer then sells the bread to the final customer at$1.00. Finally, by using the final goods method, we come up with the following table:

$$\begin{array}{l|c} \textbf{} & \textbf{Receipts at each stage (in \)} \\ \hline \text{Receipt of the farmer from the miller} & 0.21 \\ \hline \text{Receipt of a miller from the baker} & 0.49 \\ \hline \text{Receipts of the baker from the retailer} & 0.92 \\ \hline \text{Receipts of the retailer from a final customer} & 1.00 \\ \hline \text{Value of final output} & 1.00 \\ \end{array}$$

By summing the total value added to the wheat, we get the following table:

$$\begin{array}{l|c} \textbf{} & \begin{array}{c} \textbf{Value added = Income created} \\ \textbf{at each stage (in \)} \end{array} \\ \hline \text{Value added by the farmer} & 0.21 \\ \hline \text{Value added by the miller} & 0.28 \\ \hline \text{Value added by the baker} & 0.43 \\ \hline \text{Value added by the retailer} & 0.08 \\ \hline \text{Total value added / total income earned} & 1.00 \\ \end{array}$$

## Question 1

Which of the following should least likely be included in measuring the Gross Domestic Product?

A. Rent paid by a retailer

B. The salary of a cleaning lady

C. Welfare programs paid by the government

Solution

The correct answer is C.

Option A, the rent paid by retailers, must be included as value added to the goods sold by the retailer.

Option B, the salary of the cleaning lady, must be included in finding the total income.

However, Option C should not be included. Transfer payments include Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, welfare programs, and subsidies. These are not included in GDP because they are not payments for goods or services but rather means of allocating money to achieve social ends.

## Question 2

Suppose an artist draws a painting, for which he spends $200 on painting materials. The artist then exposes the painting on his website and it gets sold at$500. Using the sum-of-value-added method of calculating GDP, which of the following is most likely the value added by the artist?

A. $200 B.$300

C. $500 Solution To get the value added by the artist, one should subtract the cost of painting materials from the selling price.$500 – $200 =$300

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep

Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.