One Period Binomial Model

As the underlying value determines the option payoff, if we know the outcome of the underlying, we know the value of the option. If the underlying is above the exercise price at expiration, then the payoff is ST – X for calls and zero for puts. The converse is true if the underlying is below the exercise price at expiration. The derivation of an option pricing model requires the specification of a model of random processes that describe the movements in the underlying.

The Binomial Model for Stocks

A model with two possible outcomes is a binomial model. We start with the underlying at S0 and let the price move up to S1+ and down to S1. We don’t know which outcome will occur, but we can assign probabilities. Assuming the probability of the move to S1+ is q, then the probability of moving to S1 is 1 – q.

$$\begin{array} \hline {} & {\small q } & { S }_{ 1 }+ \\ { S }_{ 0 } & {\Huge \begin{matrix} \diagup \\ \diagdown \end{matrix} } & {} \\ {} & {\small 1-q} & { S }_{ 1 }- \\ \end{array}$$

We then specify the returns implied by these moves up and down as factors u and d where u = S1+/S0 and d = S1/S0.

$$\begin{array} \hline {} & {\small q } & { S }_{ 0 }u \\ { S }_{ 0 } & {\Huge \begin{matrix} \diagup \\ \diagdown \end{matrix} } & {} \\ {} & {\small 1-q} & { S }_{ 0 }d \\ \end{array}$$

Deriving the Value of a Call Option Using a Binomial Model

We now consider a European call option with price co today and price c1+ and c1 at expiration. Assume we sell a call and buy h units of the underlying asset with portfolio value at inception V0 = hS0 – co. At time 1, the portfolio will either be worth:

$$V_1^+ = hS_1^+ – c_1^+; or$$

$$V_1^- = hS_1^- – c_1^-$$

If the portfolio was hedged then:

$$V_1^+ = V_1^-$$

Which could be re-written as:

$$hS_1^+ – c_1^+= hS_1^- – c_1^-$$

Where $$h = \frac{c_1^+ – c_1^- }{S_1^+ – S_1^-}$$

We also know that a perfectly hedged portfolio will earn the risk-free rate so:

$$V_1^+ or \quad V_1^- = V_0(1+r)$$

We can finally obtain the formula for the option price as:

$$c_0 = \frac{πc_1^+ + (1-π)c_1^-}{1+r}$$

Where $$π = \frac{1 + r – d}{u – d}$$

How do we Interpret this Equation?

Having worked through all of the above, we have arrived at an equation for the value of a call option today, which takes the form of an expected future value (the numerator) discounted at the risk-free rate (the denominator). The volatility of the underlying is an important factor in determining the value of the option. If the volatility increases, the difference between S1+ and S1– increases which widen the range between c1and c1 leading to a higher option value.

How did q become π?

We note that our actual probabilities of q and (1 – q) are not used, but instead, we have π and (1 – π), which are called risk-neutral probabilities. If the option is trading at a price too high relative to the formula, investors can sell the call, buy h shares of the underlying and earn a return in excess of the risk-free rate while funding the transaction by borrowing at the risk-free rate. This action will put downward pressure on the call price until it conforms with the model price once more.

The Value of a Put Option Using a Binomial Model

Following the same methodology as above, we can derive a model for a put option as follows:

$$p_0 = \frac{πp_1^+ + (1-π)p_1^-}{1+r}$$

Where $$π = \frac{1 + r – d}{u – d}$$

Question

Which factors are the most relevant to determine an option’s value using a binomial pricing model?

A. The probability that the underlying will go up or down, the risk-free rate, and the initial value of the option

B. The risk-free rate, the volatility of the underlying, and the exercise price

C. The probability that the underlying will go up or down, the risk-free rate, and the risk-neutral probability

Solution

The probability that the underlying will go up or down is not a factor in determining the price of an option using a binomial model because we derive it from the formula $$π = \frac{1 + r – d}{u – d}$$.

The volatility of the underlying asset is an important factor, as is the risk-free rate, the risk-neutral probability, and the exercise price.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep

Sergio Torrico
2021-07-23
Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
diana
2021-07-17
So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
Kriti Dhawan
2021-07-16
A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
nikhil kumar
2021-06-28
Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
Marwan
2021-06-22
Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
Benjamin anonymous
2021-05-10
I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
Daniel Glyn
2021-03-24
I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
michael walshe
2021-03-18
Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.