Cash Conversion Cycle

Cash Conversion Cycle

A company’s business operations typically consist of a series of consecutive stages. For example, consider a manufacturing company whose operating cycle includes the purchase of raw materials, inventory production, sale to customers, and debt collection, as shown below:

A company’s operating cycle activities result in cash inflows, and outflows occur at different times. On the issuer’s balance sheet, future cash outflows within the operating cycle are recorded as short-term liabilities (current liabilities), while future cash inflows are recorded as short-term assets (current assets).

Tables 1 and 2 contain the definition, recognition, and derecognition of different cash outflows and inflows.

$$ \textbf{Table 1: Short-Term Assets Information} \\
\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Short-term} & \textbf{Definition} & \textbf{Recognition} & \textbf{Derecognition} \\
{\textbf{Assets} }& & & \\ \hline
{\text{Account} \\ \text{receivable} } & {\text{Payment to be} \\ \text{collected from} \\ \text{customers for} \\ \text{services or goods} \\ \text{sold.} } & {\text{When goods are} \\ \text{sold to customers} \\ \text{on credit.} } & { \text{When payment is} \\ \text{received from the} \\ \text{customer. } } \\ \hline
\text{Inventory} & { \text{Cost of goods} \\ \text{purchased or} \\ \text{produced for sale.} } & { \text{When the issuer} \\ \text{takes ownership of} \\ \text{the materials, goods,} \\ \text{suppliers, and other} \\ \text{inventories.} } & { \text{Derecognized} \\ \text{when ownership} \\ \text{rights are} \\ \text{transferred to the} \\ \text{customer (sold to} \\ \text{the customer)} }
\end{array} $$

$$ \textbf{Exhibit 2: Short-Term Liabilities Information} \\
\begin{array}{c|c|c|c}
\textbf{Short-term} & \textbf{Definition} & \textbf{Recognition} & \textbf{Derecognition} \\
{\textbf{Liabilities} }& & & \\ \hline
{\text{Accounts} \\ \text{Payable} } & { \text{Payment owed to} \\ \text{suppliers for} \\ \text{services or goods} \\ \text{received.} } & { \text{Recognized when} \\ \text{the issuer receives} \\ \text{the goods and} \\ \text{service, and} \\ \text{payment is} \\ \text{deferred to the} \\ \text{supplier.} } & { \text{When the supplier} \\ \text{is paid.} }
\end{array} $$

The average duration of each of these short-term accounts can be used to create a timeline for a corporate issuer’s operating cycle. Analysts construct the cash conversion cycle by using days of inventory on hand (DOH), days payable outstanding (DPO), and days sales outstanding (DSO).

Cash Conversion Cycle

The cash conversion cycle is the amount of time between an issuer’s payment to its suppliers and receiving cash from customers. In other words, the cash conversion cycle is the time between the derecognition of accounts payable and the derecognition of accounts receivables.

The cash conversion cycle is mathematically expressed as follows:

$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Cash conversion cycle} = & \text{Days of inventory on hand} + \text{Days sales outstanding} \\ -& \text{Days payable outstanding} \\ = & DOH+DSO-DPO \end{align*} $$

From the equation above, the cash conversion cycle can be seen as the number of days it takes for a company to convert inventory investment into cash receipts from customers. Consider the following diagram:

When the cash conversion cycle is longer, the company will need more time to finance the payment of its bills because it has not received cash receipts from customers. For instance, airlines tend to have shorter cash conversion cycles than pharmaceuticals since the latter keeps more inventory.

A short or even negative cash conversion cycle is preferred since the cash can be used to finance other activities, reducing the dependence on alternative financing options to fund operations. A negative cash conversion cycle results from a company receiving cash from customers before the suppliers are paid.

Ways of Shortening Cash Conversion Cycle

Intuitively from the conversion cycle formula, the following are ways a corporate issuer can shorten its cash conversion cycle:

  1. Reducing inventory days on hand (DOH) by:
    • Discontinuing low-demand product lines.
    • Negotiating with suppliers to increase the frequency of their deliveries to establish “just in time” inventory levels.
    • Using data analytics to rationalize the stocking levels and improve customer demand forecasts.
  2. Reducing days sales outstanding (DSO) by
    • Tightening credit standards.
    • Imposing late fees.
    • Offering discounts to early-paying clients.
    • Accelerating installment payments.
    • Working with third-party collection agencies.
  3. Increase days payable outstanding (DPO) by negotiating longer terms for supplier contracts. This method will work by dealing with a preferred supplier offering longer terms if, for example, a company purchases supplies in large volumes.

Comparing Trade Credit and Borrowing from a Bank

Lengthening the days payable outstanding can enhance the cash conversion cycle. However, some suppliers may offer discounts for prompt or early payment. If a company forgoes this discount to extend the days payable outstanding, it implicitly borrows from the supplier for the extra days at the cost of the forgone discount.

For example, assume that a company is given the following trade credit terms: “3/10, net 30”. This implies that a supplier will give the company a 3% discount if the account is paid within 10 days; otherwise, the full amount is due by the 30th day.

Suppose a company decides to forego this discount for a payment on the 30th day. In that case, the company implicitly borrows from the supplier for 20 (=30-20) days at a cost equivalent to the foregone discount.

A remedy to this problem is for a corporate issuer to borrow from a bank at a low interest rate, pay the supplier early to qualify for the discount, and repay the bank later. However, we need to calculate the effective annual rate (EAR) of supplier financing and compare it with the bank’s EAR on the loan.

The effective annual rate (EAR) of supplier Financing is given by:

$$ \begin{align*} & \text{EAR of Supplier Financing} \\ & =\left[\left(1+\frac{\text{Discount }\%}{100\%-\text{Discount }\%}\right)^\frac{\text{Days in Year}}{\text{Payment Period}-\text{Discount Perios}}\right]-1 \end{align*} $$

If the effective annual rate of the supplier financing is higher than the interest rate on the bank loan, then the company should borrow from its bank and pay the supplier early, and vice versa.

Example: Comparing Trade Credit and Borrowing from a Bank

Assume that a manufacturing company is given the following terms of trade credit: “2/10, net 30” by one of its raw materials suppliers. Further, the company lacks enough cash to pay its suppliers to take advantage of the discount.

The company decides to borrow from its local bank at an annual rate of 10% to pay its suppliers within 10 days. Is this a prudent move?

Solution

We need to calculate the effective annual rate on the trade credit:

$$ \begin{align*} & \text{EAR of Supplier Financing} \\ & =\left[\left(1+\frac{\text{Discount }\%}{100\%-\text{Discount }\%}\right)^\frac{\text{Days in Year}}{\text{Payment Period}-\text{Discount Perios}}\right]-1 \\ &
=\left[\left(1+\frac{2\%}{100\%-2\%}\right)^\frac{365}{30-10}\right]-1=44.59\% \end{align*} $$

Since the effective annual rate of 44.59% on supplier financing is higher than the 10% interest rate on the bank loan, the company should take the bank loan. Consequently, the company retains the cash and pays a lower interest rate on the financing.

Implication of Long Cash Conversion Cycle

A long cash conversion cycle can be an indicator of business model or industry characteristics. However, analysts are concerned about a longer cash conversion cycle than competitors and its lengthening over time. This can be an indicator of poor customer credit quality, declined customer demand, or the loss of bargaining power with suppliers.

Working Capital

In addition to the cash conversion cycle, working capital is also used to measure the efficiency of business operations. A broad measure of working capital is the total working capital defined as:

$$ \text{Total working capital}=\text{Current assets}-\text{Current liabilities} $$

Net working capital is a measure of working capital that does not include items minimally associated with the cash conversion cycle or business operations. Such items include cash, marketable securities, and short-term debt.

$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Net working } & \text{capital} \\ & =\text{Current assets}\left(\text{excluding cash and marketable securities}\right) \\ & -\text{Current liabilities(excluding short-term and current debt)} \end{align*} $$

Total or net working capital is often expressed as a percentage of sales to control for comparability across firms. The ratio of working capital and cash conversion cycle are interrelated. A long cash conversion cycle is associated with a high working capital-to-sales ratio and vice versa. Industries such as the pharmaceutical industry that hold large inventories due to regulations generally have a high ratio of working capital to sales.

Example: Calculating Total Working Capital and Net Working Capital

Consider the following balance sheet for Company ABC (in $ million):

$$ \begin{array}{l|r}
\text{Cash} & 150 \\
\text{Marketable securities} & 400 \\
\text{Accounts receivable} & 500 \\
\text{Inventory} & 900 \\
\text{Prepaid expenses} & 600 \\
\text{PPE} & 20,000 \\ \hline
\text{Total Assets} & 22,550 \\ \\
\text{Accounts payable:} & 600 \\
\text{Accrued expenses} & 80 \\
\text{Short-term debt} & 1,200 \\ \hline
\text{Total liabilities} & 1,880 \\ \hline
\end{array} $$

Calculate total working capital and net working capital.

$$ \text{Total working capital}=\text{Current assets}-\text{Current liabilities} $$

$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Current assets} & =(\text{Cash}+\text{marketable securities}+\text{Accounts receivable} \\ & +\text{Inventory}+\text{Prepaid expenses}) \\ & =150+400+500+900+600=2,550 \\
\text{Current Liabilities}& =\text{Accounts Payable}+\text{Accrued Expenses} \\ & +\text{Short term debt} \\ & =600+80+1,200=1,880 \\
\therefore \text{Working Capital} &=2,550-1,880=670 \end{align*} $$

$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Net working }& \text{capital} \\ & =\text{Current assets(excluding cash and marketable securities)} \\ & -\text{Current liabilities(excluding short-term and current debt)} \\ & =\left[2,550-\left(150+400\right)\right]-\left[1,880-\left(1,200\right)\right]=1,320 \end{align*} $$

Question

Due to limited cash flow, an issuer must decide which supplier terms are the least costly. The credit term with the lowest effective interest rate (EAR) of supplier financing is most likely:

  1. \(\cfrac {2}{10}, \text{ net } 50\).
  2. \(\cfrac {3}{10}, \text{ net } 40\).
  3. \(\cfrac {2}{15}, \text{ net } 60\).

Solution

C is correct.

Foregoing a discount offered by the supplier or vendor has an implicit financing cost depending on the amount of the discount forgone and the length of the payment period after the discount period. Calculations of the cost of financing, expressed as an effective annual rate, for each set of credit terms, are as follows:

$$ \begin{align*} & \text{EAR of Supplier Financing} \\ & =\left[\left(1+\frac{\text{Discount }\%}{100\%-\text{Discount }\%}\right)^\frac{\text{Days in Year}}{\text{Payment Period}-\text{Discount Perios}}\right]-1 \end{align*} $$

$$ \text{EAR of} \cfrac{2}{10}, \text{ net } 50 =\left(\left(1+\frac{2%}{100\%-2%}\right)^\frac{365}{50-10}\right)-1=0.2024 \text{ or } 20.24\% $$

$$ \text{EAR of } \cfrac{3}{10}, \text{ net } 50 =\left({\left(1+\frac{3\%}{100\%-3\%}\right)}^\frac{365}{40-10}\right)-1=0.4485 \text{ or } 44.85\% $$

$$ \text{EAR of }\cfrac{2}{15}, \text{ net } 60=\left(\left(1+\frac{2%}{100%-2%}\right)^\frac{365}{60-15}\right)-1=0.1780 \text{ or } 17.80\% $$

Therefore, the credit terms with lower EAR of supplier financing ins \(\cfrac {2}{15}, \text{ net } 60\).

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.