Macro Risk, Business Risk, and Financial Risk

Macro Risk, Business Risk, and Financial Risk


Macro risk originates from political, economic, legal, and other institutional factors in an economy, country, or region. As such, some of the factors that catalyze macro-risk include exchange rates, political instability, and gaps in legal or financial structure.

Business risks refer to the risk that the operating outcomes deviate from expectations independently of the financing method. Business risk encompasses both industry risk and company-specific risk.

Financial risk arises from a firm’s capital structure, primarily from debt and other liabilities (such as leases) that need fixed contractual payments.

It is important to note that risks have a cumulative impact. For example, both macro risk and business risk impact the operating results of a firm. Also, macro, business, and financial risks affect cash flow, net earnings, and the capacity to honor contractual payments. Lastly, financial risk umbrellas the effects of macro risk, business risk, and financial leverage.

Business Risk

Business risk is split into industry risks and company-specific risks.

Industry Risks

Industry risks affect all competitors in an industry. Risk factors under industry risk impact the overall level of demand, pricing, and profitability. Components of industry risks include:

  • Cyclicality: Demand can be cyclical in most industries. This is especially the case in housing, durable goods, and capital equipment. For businesses facing cyclical demand, revenue fluctuates, amplifying the fluctuations in operating profit (because of fixed costs).
  • Industry structure: Lower number (low concentration) of small competing firms in the industry causes high competitive intensity. Examples are electrical contracting and law firms.
  • Competitive intensity: Affects overall industry profitability as measured by return on invested capital (ROIC) and operating profit margins (EBIT/Revenue).
  • Competitive dynamics within the value chain: Interactions between buyers, suppliers, current and potential competitors, and suppliers of substitute competitors may exert pressure on the profitability of a firm.
  • Long-term growth and demand outlook: An expected decline in the growth of an industry may trigger excessive capacity and heightened competition. On the other hand, long-term growth (mainly through innovation) cultivates an environment for profitability.
  • Impact of other industry risks: Other risks, such as regulatory and external risks, may impact the demand and profitability of the industry.

Company-specific Risks

Company-specific risks are founded on the nature, scale, and maturity of a business. These risks are closely associated with the market position of a firm and its business model. Company-specific risks are classified into:

1. Competitive risk: Risk of losing market share or pricing power to other competitors. Generally, it implies a lack of competitive advantage. Competitive risk also emanates from disruption caused by new entrants who might have new technology or business models, risking a market share takeover.

Sources of competitive advantage include: 

  • Cost advantages are attributable to factors such as superior processes and proprietary technology.
  • Network effects in case of use of social media.
  • Product or service differentiation that creates value for customers. For instance, reliable, durable, and high-performing products.
  • Switching barriers. These are factors that make it costly or hard to change suppliers. For instance, a customer may be required to invest in training when switching suppliers.

 2. Product market risk: Common in startup (or pre-revenue) companies. It is the risk that a new product (or service) will fall short of expectations. 

 3. Execution risk: The risk that the management of a firm will not achieve the expected results. Execution risk is amplified by business risk.

4. Capital investment risk: The risk that the investment made by a firm will give sub-optimal results. Capital investment risk is common in mature businesses with stable cash flows but lacking natural investments. It also affects firms whose managements invest in high-profile ego-driven investments.

 5. ESG risk: Occurs due to the potential collision of objectives of shareholders and management (governance risk). Shareholders are concerned about value maximization while management pursues growth for their reputation. Alternatively, management may resist changes to the business.

6. Operating leverage: High operating leverage positively impacts profitability and value for growing business. However, for struggling businesses, high business leverage breeds business risk. 

Financial Risk

As defined earlier, financial risk arises from a firm’s capital structure. Primarily, it arises from debt and other liabilities (such as leases) that need fixed contractual payments.

Fixed contractual payments cause greater upside and downside variations in net profit and cash flow than operating profit (financial leverage). Moreover, fixed contractual payments make firms vulnerable to a lack of financing and default risk. 

Financial risk is linked to the variability of profits and cash flows. On the other hand, profits and cashflows are related to the predictability or volatility of revenues and operating cash flows, which is basically business risk. As such, it is important to restate that financial risk reflects macro and business risks’ impact.

Components and Measurements of Leverage

Financial risks can be quantified using total leverage. This way, profit sensitivity is measured by examining the relationship between a change in net income and a change in revenues.

Leverage (Total leverage) consists of operating leverage and financial leverage connected as follows:

$$\text{Total leverage} = \text{Operating leverage}\times \text{Financial leverage}$$

Operating the sensitivity of operating profit (EBIT) to change in revenues:

$$\text{Operating leverage} =\frac{\text{Contribution}}{\text{EBIT}}$$

On the other hand, the financial leverage sensitivity  of the net profit to a change in operating profit:

$$\text{Financial leverage} =\frac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{EBT}}$$

Note that in the financial leverage formula, net income is proxied by EBT. This is because tax rates are variable but usually a stable proportion of EBT. As such, financial leverage can be calculated as the percentage change in EBIT divided by the percentage change in EPS.

In summary, business risk can be seen as the risk of a revenue shortfall magnified by operating leverage and financial risk as the magnification of business risk through financial leverage.

Question

Which of the following is most likely a source of business risk in startup companies?

  1. Execution risk.
  2. Competitive risk.
  3. Product market risk.

The correct answer is C.

Product market risk is the risk that a new product will fall short of expectations. From the definition, it is a major consideration for early-stage startups since it is a substantial source of business risk.

 A and B are incorrect. Competitive risk and execution risk affect early startups and mature businesses. Note, however, that product market risk is relatively prevalent in early startups.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.