Limited Time Offer: Save 10% on all 2022 Premium Study Packages with promo code: BLOG10

Shortfall Risk, Safety-first Ratio and Identification of an Optimal Portfolio Using Roy’s Safety-first Criterion

Shortfall Risk, Safety-first Ratio and Identification of an Optimal Portfolio Using Roy’s Safety-first Criterion

Shortfall risk refers to the probability that a portfolio will not exceed the minimum (benchmark) return that has been set by an investor. In other words, it is the risk that a portfolio will fall short of the level of return considered acceptable by an investor. As such, shortfall risks are downside risks. While a shortfall risk focuses on the downside economic risk, the standard deviation measures the overall volatility of a financial asset.


Safety-first Ratio

Roy’s safety-first criterion states that the optimal portfolio is the one that minimizes the probability that a portfolio return, denoted by \(R_P\), may fall below the threshold level of return, \(R_L\). The optimal portfolio minimizes \(P(R_P < R_L)\).

As such, if returns are distributed normally, the optimal portfolio is the one with the highest safety-first ratio.

$$ \text{SFRatio}=\frac { E\left( { R }_{ p } \right) -{ R }_{ L } }{ \sigma _{ p } } $$

The numerator, \(E(R_P)\) – \(R_L\), represents the distance from the mean return to the threshold level, i.e., it measures the excess return over and above the threshold level of return, per unit risk.

Example: Safety-first Ratio

An investor sets a minimum threshold of 3%. There are three portfolios from which he is to choose one. The expected return and the standard deviation for each portfolio are as given below:

$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} {} & \textbf{Portfolio A} & \textbf{Portfolio B} & \textbf{Portfolio C} \\ \hline {\text {Expected return}} & {5\%} & {10\%} & {20\%} \\ \hline \text{Standard deviation} & {15\%} & {20\%} & {25\%} \\ \end{array} $$

What is the optimal portfolio for the investor?


You should compute the safety-first ratio for each of the three portfolios and then compare them.

For portfolio A:

$$ \text{SFRatio}_{\text A} =\cfrac {(5 – 3)}{15} = 0.1333 $$

Similarly, for portfolio B:

$$ \text{SFRatio}_{\text B} =\cfrac {(10 – 3)}{20} = 0.35 $$


$$ \text{SFRatio}_{\text C}=\cfrac {(20 – 3)}{25} = 0.68 $$

The optimal portfolio should minimize the safety-first ratio. Comparing the three ratios, it is easy to notice that the safety-first ratio for portfolio C is the highest. Therefore, the investor should choose portfolio C.


The returns on a fund are distributed normally. At the end of year \(t\), the fund has a value of $100,000. At the end of year \(t+1\), the fund manager wishes to withdraw $10,000 for further funding, but is reluctant to tap into the $100,000 dollars. There are two investment options:

$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c} {} & \text{Portfolio A} & \text {Portfolio B} \\ \hline {\text{Expected return} } & {14\%} & {13\%} \\ \hline \text{Standard deviation} & {17\%} & {20\%} \\ \end{array} $$

Which portfolio is preferable for the manager?

A. Portfolio A.

B. Portfolio B.

C. The manager is indifferent to the two portfolios.


The correct answer is A.

First, you should calculate the threshold return from the information given. Since there should be no tapping into the fund, the threshold return is \(\cfrac {10,000}{100,000} = 10\% \text { or } 0.1\).

You should then calculate the safety-first ratio for each portfolio:

$$ \text{SFRatio}_{\text A} =\cfrac {(14 – 10)}{17} = 0.24 $$

$$ \text{SFRatio}_{\text B} =\cfrac {(13 – 10)}{20} = 0.15 $$

Portfolio A has the highest safety-first ratio. This is the reason it is the most desirable.

Note to candidates: You can also go a step further and calculate \(P(R_P < R_L)\). To do this, you would have to negate each safety-first ratio and then find the CDF of the standard normal distribution for the resulting value. That is,

$$ \begin{align*}
P(R_P < R_L) & = F(-\text{SFRatio}) \\
F(-0.24)& = 1 – 0.5948 = 0.4052 \\
F(-0.15) & = 1 – 0.5596 = 0.4404 \\
\end{align*} $$

$$ (-\text{Where SFRatio is the z-value}) $$

Interpretation: For portfolio A, there is approximately a 40% probability of obtaining a return below the threshold return. For portfolio B, this probability rises to 44%. Therefore, we choose the option for which the chance of not exceeding the benchmark return is lowest – portfolio A.



Featured Study with Us
CFA® Exam and FRM® Exam Prep Platform offered by AnalystPrep

Study Platform

Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Online Tutoring
    Our videos feature professional educators presenting in-depth explanations of all topics introduced in the curriculum.

    Video Lessons

    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.