Confidence Intervals
A confidence interval (CI) gives an “interval estimate” of an unknown population parameter... Read More
Covariance between variables can be calculated in two ways. One method is the historical sample covariance between two random variables \(X_i\) and \(Y_i\). It is based on a sample of past data of size \(n\) and is given by:
$$\text{Cov}_{X_i,Y_i}=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}{(X_i -\bar{X})(Y_i -\bar{Y})}}{n-1}$$
Alternatively, covariance can be defined as the probability-weighted average of the cross-products of each random variable’s deviation from its own expected value. That is:
$$\text{Cov}_{X_i,Y_i}=E\left[(X_i -\bar{X})(Y_i -\bar{Y})\right]$$
Consider the following example:
Suppose we wish to find the variance of each asset and the covariance between the returns of ABC and XYZ, given that the amount invested in each company is $1,000.
This table is used to calculate the expected returns:
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} & \textbf{Strong Economy} & \textbf{Normal Economy} & \textbf{Week Economy} \\ \hline \text{Probability} & {15\%} & {60\%} & {25\%} \\ \hline \text{ABC Returns} & {40\%} & {20\%} & {0\%} \\ \hline \text{XYZ Returns} & {20\%} & {15\%} & {4\%} \\ \end{array} $$
Solution
For us to find the covariance, we must calculate the expected return of each asset as well as their variances. The assets’ weights are:
$$ \text W_{\text{ABC}}=\cfrac {1000}{2000} = 0.5 $$
$$ \text W_{\text{XYZ}}=\cfrac {1000}{2000} = 0.5 $$
Next, we should calculate the individual expected returns:
$$ \text E(\text R_{\text{ABC}}) = 0.15 × 0.40 + 0.60 × 0.2 + 0.25 × 0.00 = 0.18 $$
$$ \text E(\text R_{\text{XYZ}}) = 0.15 × 0.2 + 0.60 × 0.15 + 0.25 × 0.04 = 0.13 $$
Finally, we can compute the covariance between the returns of the two assets:
$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Cov}(\text R_{\text{ABC},\text{XYZ}}) &= 0.15(0.40 – 0.18)(0.20 – 0.13) \\
& + 0.6(0.20 – 0.18)(0.15 – 0.13) \\
& + 0.25(0.00 – 0.18)(0.04 – 0.13) \\
& = 0.0066
\end{align*} $$
Example: Calculating the Covariance #2
A portfolio manager is considering the following two possible economic growth of a country and the joint variability of returns on two stocks in a portfolio:
$$\begin{array}{l|c|c}
\textbf {Economic Growth } & \bf {<4 \%} & \bf {>4 \%} \\
\hline \text { Probability } & 40 \% & 60 \% \\
\hline \text { Return of Stock A } & 2.3 \% & 8 \% \\
\hline \text { Return of Stock B } & 6.5 \% & 3 \% \\
\end{array}
$$
What is the covariance between the return of Stock A and Stock B?
Solution
Expected return of Stock A \(= (40\% × 2.3\%) + (60\% × 8\%) = 5.72\%\)
Expected return of Stock B \(= (40\% × 6.5\%) + (60\% × 3\%) = 4.40\%\)
Note: For the rest of the calculation, your curriculum sometimes ditches the percentage signs so that 4.40% becomes 4.40.
The deviations of returns at economic growth of < 4% \(= (2.3 – 5.72) × (6.5- 4.40) = -7.182\)
The deviations of returns at economic growth of >4% \(= (8 -5.72) × (3-4.40) = -3.192\)
The covariance of returns between stock A and stock B is computed as follows:
$$\text{Cov}(\text R_{\text{A},\text{B}}) = (-7.182 × 0.40) + (-3.192 × 0.60) = -4.788$$
Interpretation: Since covariance is negative, the two returns show some co-movement in opposite signs.
Question
The following table represents the estimated returns for two motor vehicle production brands – TY and Ford, in 3 industrial environments: strong (50% probability), average (30% probability), and weak (20% probability).
$$ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c} {} & \textbf{TY Returns +6%} & \text{TY Returns +3%} & \textbf{TY Returns -1%} \\ \hline {\text{Ford Sales }+10\%} & \text{Strong (0.5)} & {} & {} \\ \hline {\text{Ford Sales }+4\%} & {} & \text{Average (0.3)} & {} \\ \hline {\text{Ford Sales }-4\%} & {} & {} & \text{Weak (0.2)} \\ \end{array} $$
Given the above joint probability function, the covariance between TY and Ford returns is closest to:
A. 0.054.
B. 0.1542.
C. 0.1442.
Solution
The correct answer is C.
First, we must start by calculating the expected return for each brand:
$$ \text{Expected return for TY} = (0.5 × 6\%) + (0.3 × 3\%) + (0.2 × (-1\%)) = 3\% + 0.9\% – 0.2\% = 3.7\% $$
$$ \text{Expected return for Ford} = (0.5 × 10\%) + (0.3 × 4\%) + (0.2 × (-4\%)) = 5\% + 1.2\% – 0.8\% = 5.4\% $$
Next, we can now compute the covariance:
$$ \begin{align*}
\text{Covariance} & = 0.5(6\% – 3.7\%)(10\% – 5.4\%) \\
& + 0.3(3\% – 3.7\%)(4\% – 5.4\%) \\
& + 0.2(-1\% – 3.7\%)(-4\% – 5.4\%) \\
& = 5.29\% + 0.294\% + 8.836\% \\
& = 0.1442 \\
\end{align*} $$Interpretation: The covariance is positive. This means that the returns for the two brands show some co-movement in the same direction.
Note: This would most likely be the case in real life because the companies are in the same industry, and therefore, the systematic risks affecting them are quite similar.