ESG Considerations in Portfolio Planni ...
Environmental, social, and governance factors are collectively referred to by the acronym “ESG”.... Read More
Asset managers are typically deemed to be on the buy-side. This ideally means that they buy the products of sell-side firms. Buy-side firms include asset managers, hedge funds, institutional investors, and retail investors. On the other hand, sell-side firms include investment and commercial banks, stockbrokers, and market makers.
Active managers represent around 80% of the asset management industry. Through fundamental and quantitative research, they attempt to outperform benchmarks, such as the S&P 500. On the contrary, passive management simply tries to replicate the returns of a market index.
Traditional management usually focuses on long stocks and bonds to create diversified client portfolios. In contrast, alternative management uses leverage, derivatives, long-short strategies, etc., to either outperform a predetermined index or to create a return that is uncorrelated to the market.
Lately, there has been a blurred line between traditional and alternative management. Many traditional managers have introduced higher-margin alternative products to clients.
Most asset managers are privately-owned firms. However, some publicly-traded asset management firms also exist. These often offer services such as insurance and/or banking services.
Passive management is gaining currency in the asset management industry. The two key reasons for this are the low fees charged for passively-managed funds and the fact that active managers are having a hard time beating indices in increasingly-efficient markets.
Nowadays, algorithms are much faster at analyzing earnings and economic news than humans. This opens the door to short-term trading. In fact, many asset managers are now using machine-learning techniques to help process data.
In order to generate alpha, asset managers are trying to discover data with predictive potential faster than fellow market participants.
In 2017, robo-advisers managed an estimated USD 180 billion in assets. The main advantages of robo-advisors are that: