Limited Time Offer: Save 10% on all 2022 Premium Study Packages with promo code: BLOG10

Calculate and Interpret the Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio, M2, and Jensen’s Alpha

Calculate and Interpret the Sharpe Ratio, Treynor Ratio, M2, and Jensen’s Alpha

The following are the four ratios commonly used in performance evaluation.

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe Ratio is defined as the portfolio risk premium divided by the portfolio risk.

$$ \text{Sharpe ratio} = \frac{ R_p – R_f } { σ_p } $$

The Sharpe ratio, or reward-to-variability ratio, is the slope of the capital allocation line (CAL). The greater the slope (higher number) the better the asset. Note that the risk being used is the total risk of the portfolio, not its systematic risk which is a limitation of the measure. The portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio has the best performance but the Sharpe ratio by itself is not informative. In order to rank portfolios, the Sharpe ratio for each portfolio must be computed.

Further limitation occurs when the numerators are negative. In this instance, the Sharpe ratio will be less negative for a riskier portfolio resulting in incorrect rankings.

Treynor Ratio

The Treynor ratio is an extension of the Sharpe ratio. Instead of using total risk, Treynor uses beta or systematic risk in the denominator.

$$ \text{Treynor ratio} = \frac{ R_p – R_f } { β _p } $$

As with the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio requires positive numerators to give meaningful comparative results. Apart from this, the Treynor ratio does not work for negative beta assets. Also, while both the Sharpe and Treynor ratios can rank portfolios, they do not provide information on whether the portfolios are better than the market portfolio. Similarly, they do not offer information about the degree of superiority of a higher ratio portfolio over a lower ratio portfolio.

M-Squared (M²) Ratio

The concept behind the M² ratio is to create a portfolio P’ that mimics the risk of the market portfolio by altering the weights of the actual portfolio P and the risk-free asset until portfolio P’ has the same total risk as the market. The return on the mimicking portfolio P’ is determined and compared with the market return.

The weight in portfolio P (wp) which sets the portfolio risk equal to the market risk can be written as:

$$ w_p = \frac{ σ_m } { σ_p } $$

With the balance (1 – wp) invested in the risk-free asset.

The return for the mimicking portfolio P’ is as follows:

$$ R_{ p’} = w_p R_p + (1 – w_p ) R_f $$

Which we can reformulate as:

$$ R_{ p’} = \frac{ σ_m } { σ_p } × R_p + (1 – \frac{ σ_m } { σ_p } )×R_f $$


$$ R_{ p’} = R_f + σ_m \frac{ [R_p – R_f ] } { σ_p } $$

The difference in return between the mimicking portfolio and the market return is M² which is expressed as:

$$ M^2 = (R_p – R_f )× \frac{ σ_m } { σ_p } – (R_m – R_f) $$

A portfolio that matches the return of the market will have an M² value equal to zero while a portfolio that outperforms will have a positive value. By using the M² measure, it is possible to rank portfolios and also to determine which portfolios beat the market on a risk-adjusted basis.

Jensen’s Alpha

Jensen’s alpha is based on systematic risk. The daily returns of the portfolio are regressed against the daily returns of the market. Essentially, this is done in order to compute a measure of this systematic risk in the same manner as the CAPM. The difference between the actual return of the portfolio and the calculated or modeled risk-adjusted return is a gauge of performance relative to the market.

$$ \text{Jensen’s alpha} = α_p = R_p – [R_f + β_p (R_m– R_f)] $$

If αp is positive, the portfolio has outperformed the market while a negative value indicates underperformance. The values of alpha can also be used to rank portfolios or the managers of those portfolios with the alpha being a representation of the maximum amount an investor should pay for the active management of that portfolio.


A client has three portfolio choices, each with the following characteristics:

\textbf{} & \textbf{Expected Return} & \textbf{Volatility} & \textbf{Beta} \\
\text{Portfolio A} & 15\% & 12\% & 10\% \\
\text{Portfolio B} & 18\% & 14\% & 11\% \\
\text{Portfolio C} & 12\% & 9\% & 5\% \\

The efficient market portfolio has an expected return of 20%, a standard deviation of 12% and the risk-free rate of interest is 5%.

Based on the Sharpe ratio for each portfolio, the client should choose:

  1. portfolio A;
  2. portfolio B; or
  3. Portfolio C.


The correct answer is portfolio B.

$$ \text{Sharpe ratio} = \frac{ R_p – R_f } { σ_p } $$

The portfolio with the highest Sharpe ratio has the best performance.

\textbf{} & \textbf{Calculation} & \textbf{Sharpe Measure} \\
\text{Portfolio A} & (15\%-5\%)/12\% & 0.83 \\
\text{Portfolio B} & (18\%-5\%)/14\% & 0.93 \\
\text{Portfolio C} & (12\%-5\%)/9\% & 0.77 \\

Note: The Sharpe ratio makes use of total risk, not just the systematic risk of a portfolio (as represented by beta). Further, note that the information about the efficient market portfolio has no use in this case.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop GMAT® Exam Prep

    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.