The Credit Quality of a Corporate Bond Issuer

The Credit Quality of a Corporate Bond Issuer

To illustrate how to evaluate the credit quality of a corporation, we will look at CVS, a US-based healthcare company. You will be in the shoes of a banker that needs to assess the creditworthiness of CVS. Using the financial statements information provided below, you need to report and interpret the following:

  • profitability: calculation of operating profit margin, EBITDA and free cash flow after dividends. (Note that the company did not pay dividends during the years analyzed).
  • leverage: Analysis of leverage ratios such as Debt/EBITDA, Debt/Capital, Free cash flow after dividends/debt.
  • coverage: calculation of the interest coverage ratio using both EBIT and EBITDA.

$$
\begin{array}{}
\text{CSV Speciality Healthcare’s Financial Statements} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{}
\text{Consolidated Statement of Operations} \\
\text{Years ended December 31} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Dollars in millions except} \\ \textbf{per share amounts)} \end{array} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\textbf{Net revenues} & \textbf{2,500.0} & \textbf{2,750.0} & \textbf{3,500.0} \\
\textbf{Operating expenses} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Cost of sales} & \text{1,500.0} & \text{1,600.0} & \text{2,000.0} \\
\text{Research and development} & \text{175.0} & \text{200.0} & \text{300.0} \\
\text{Selling and marketing} & \text{235.0} & \text{265.0} & \text{325.0} \\
\text{General and administrative} & \text{200.0} & \text{260.0} & \text{440.0} \\
\text{Amortization} & \text{80.0} & \text{90.0} & \text{180.0} \\
\text{Loss on asset sales and impairments} & \text{5.0} & \text{2.5} & \text{30.0} \\
\textbf{Total operating expenses} & \textbf{2,195.0} & \textbf{2,417.5} & \textbf{3,275.0} \\
\textbf{Operating Income} & \textbf{305.0} & \textbf{332.5} & \textbf{225.0} \\
\textbf{Other income/(expense)} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Interest expense)} & \text{(30.0)} & \text{(35.0)} & \text{(85.0)} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{}
\text{Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows} \\
\text{Years ended December 31} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Dollars in millions except} \\ \textbf{per share amounts)} \end{array} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\textbf{Cash flows from operating activities} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Net income} & \text{250.0} & \text{220.0} & \text{180.0} \\
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Reconciliation to net cash provided} \\ \textbf{by operating activities:)} \end{array} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Depreciation} & \text{90.0} & \text{95.0} & \text{100.0} \\
\text{Amortization} & \text{80.0} & \text{90.0} & \text{180.0} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Net cash flow provided by} \\ \textbf{operating activities:)} \end{array} & \textbf{425.0} & \textbf{375.0} & \textbf{575.0} \\
\textbf{Cash flows from investing activities} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Additions to property and equipment} & \text{(60.0)} & \text{(50.0)} & \text{(55.0)} \\
\text{Additions to product rights and other intangibles} & \text{(40.0)} & \text{(20.0)} & \text{(10.0)} \\
\text{Proceeds from sale of property and equipment} & \text{0.0} & \text{5.0} & \text{5.0} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\textbf{Net cash used in investing activities} & \textbf{(100.0)} & \textbf{(1,000.0)} & \textbf{(75.0)} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{}
\text{Consolidated Balance Sheets} \\
\text{Years ended December 31} \\
\end{array}
$$

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Dollars in millions except} \\ \textbf{per share amounts)} \end{array} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\textbf{assets} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{…} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\textbf{Liabilities} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\begin{array}{l} \text{(Short-term debt and current} \\ \textbf{portion of long term debt)} \end{array} & \text{60.0} & \text{300.0} & \text{0.0} \\
\text{Long term debt} & \text{800.0} & \text{1,000.0} & \text{1,000.0} \\
\textbf{Equity} & \text{} & \text{} & \text{} \\
\text{Preferred stock} & \text{0.0} & \text{0.0} & \text{0.0} \\
\text{Common stock} & \text{0.4} & \text{0.4} & \text{0.4} \\
\text{Additional paid-in capital} & \text{995.9} & \text{1,686.9} & \text{1,771.8} \\
\text{Retained earnings} & \text{1,418.1} & \text{1,640.1} & \text{1,824.5} \\
\end{array}
$$

Profitability Ratios

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Dollars in millions except} \\ \textbf{per share amounts)} \end{array} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\begin{array}{l} \text{Operating profit margin (%)=} \\ \text{Operating income / Revenue} \end{array} & \text{12.2%} & \text{12.1%} & \text{6.4%} \\
\hline
\begin{array}{l} \text{EBITDA = Operating income +} \\ \text{Depreciation + Amortization} \end{array} & \text{475.0} & \text{517.5} & \text{505.0} \\
\hline
\begin{array}{l} \text{FCF after dividends = Cash flow from} \\ \text{operations – Capital expenditures -} \\ \text{Dividends} \end{array} & \text{325.0} & \text{310.0} & \text{515.0} \\
\end{array}
$$

Where Capital expenditures = Additions to property and equipment + Additions to product rights and other intangibles + Proceeds from sale of property and equipment

The operating profit margin declined significantly even though EBITDA and FCF increased after dividends. As a good financial analyst, you might have to go back into the financial statements and look at the reason(s) behind the decrease in operating income.

Leverage Ratios

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\begin{array}{l} \textbf{(Dollars in millions except} \\ \textbf{per share amounts)} \end{array} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\text{Debt} & \text{860.0} & \text{1,300.0} & \text{1,000.0} \\
\text{Debt / EBITDA} & \text{1.8x} & \text{2.5x} & \text{2.0x} \\
\hline
\text{Capital = Debt + Equity} & \text{3,024.4} & \text{4,407.4} & \text{4,416.7} \\
\text{Debt / Capital (%)} & \text{28.4%} & \text{29.5%} & \text{22.6%} \\
\hline
\text{FCF after Dividends / Debt (%)} & \text{37.8%} & \text{23.8%} & \text{51.5%} \\
\end{array}
$$

Where Total debt = Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt + Long term debt

Leverage ratios imply volatility in the capital structure of the company. However, the creditworthiness in 2016 is the highest compared to 2015 and 2014. This is attributable to the fact that the firm completely paid off its short-term debt in 2015. This should send a good signal to its debtholders.

Coverage Ratios

$$
\begin{array}{l|r|r|r}
\text{} & \textbf{2014} & \textbf{2015} & \textbf{2016} \\
\hline
\text{EBIT / Interest expense} & \text{10.2x} & \text{9.5x} & \text{2.6x}\\
\hline
\text{EBITDA / Interest expense} & \text{15.8x} & \text{14.8x} & \text{5.9x} \\
\end{array}
$$

The lower the coverage ratio, the greater the company’s debt and the possibility of bankruptcy. A lower ratio indicates that the firm has less operating profits to meet interest payments.

Note that both coverage ratios have decreased from 2014 to 2016. We can, therefore, deduce that the firm’s creditworthiness has declined between 2014 and 2016.

The decline in the ratios indicates that the growth in EBIT and EBITDA are not keeping pace with the rising interest expense.

Therefore, the firm is repaying a larger portion of interest expenses in 2016 compared to the previous two years and is as such more prone to bankruptcy.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.