Convexity and Convexity Adjustment

Convexity and Convexity Adjustment

Duration provides a linear approximation of the change in a bond’s price with respect to changes in yield. On the other hand, convexity measures the non-linear, second-order effect of yield changes on a bond’s price. It captures the curvature of the price-yield relationship.

While duration estimates price changes linearly, the true bond price-yield relationship is convex. Convexity becomes particularly crucial when considering significant yield changes and for bonds with longer maturities.

Calculating Convexity

Convexity can be calculated using the formula:

\[\%\Delta P_{VFull} \approx ( – \text{AnnModDur} \times \Delta\text{Yield}) + \left\lbrack \frac{1}{2} \times \text{AnnConvexity} \times (\Delta\text{Yield})^{2} \right\rbrack\]

The first term captures the effect from modified duration. The second term represents the convexity adjustment.

Convexity can also be approximated using the following formula:

\[ApproxCon\ = \frac{\left( PV_{-} \right) + \left( PV_{+} \right) – \left\lbrack 2 \times \left( PV_{0} \right) \right\rbrack}{(\Delta\text{Yield})^{2} \times \left( PV_{0} \right)}\]

Factors Affecting Convexity

  1. Maturity: Longer maturity increases convexity.
  2. Coupon rate: Lower coupon rate increases convexity.
  3. YTM: Lower YTM increases convexity.
  4. Cash Flow Dispersion: For two bonds with the same duration, the one with more dispersed cash flows will have greater convexity.

Benefits of Convexity

Bonds with greater convexity perform better in both rising and falling yield scenarios, making them less risky for investors. This assumes that the difference in convexity is not reflected in the bond’s price. For large yield changes, a bond’s price will rise more with a decrease in yield and fall less with an increase in yield if it has higher convexity.

Example: Calculating Convexity

Consider a bond that has a term to maturity of 3 years, an annual coupon rate of 2%, a yield-to-maturity (YTM) of 2%, and is priced at 100 per 100 par value.

  1. Calculate the modified duration and convexity for the bond at issuance.
  2. Calculate ApproxModDur and ApproxCon for the bond using a 10 bp increase and decrease in the yield-to-maturity.

Calculating Modified Duration and Convexity

\[ \begin{array}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \textbf{Period} & \textbf{Time to Receipt} & \textbf{Cashflow Amount} & \textbf{Present Value} & \textbf{Weights} & \textbf{Time to Receipt*Weight} & \textbf{Convexity of Cashflows} \\ \hline 1 & 1.0000 & 2 & 1.9608 & 0.01960 & 0.02 & 0.04 \\ \hline 2 & 2.0000 & 2 & 1.9223 & 0.01922 & 0.04 & 0.11 \\ \hline 3 & 3.0000 & 102 & 96.1169 & 0.96118 & 2.88 & 11.31 \\ \hline \textbf{Total} & & & \textbf{100.0000} & \textbf{1.0000} & \textbf{2.94} & \textbf{11.46} \\ \end{array} \]

Annualized Macaulay Duration = 2.94

Annualized convexity = 11.46

Convexity for each period has been calculated as:

\[\text{Convexity}= \text{Time to receipt of cashflows} \times \left(\text{Time to receipt of cashflows} + 1\right) \times \text{Weight} \times \left( 1 + \frac{YTM}{m} \right)^{- m}\]

Where m is the periodicity.

Calculating ApproxModDur and ApproxCon

\[ApproxCon = \frac{\left( PV_{-} \right) + \left( PV_{+} \right) – \left\lbrack 2 \times \left( PV_{0} \right) \right\rbrack}{(\Delta\text{Yield})^{2} \times \left( PV_{0} \right)}\]

\[{PV}_{0} = \frac{2}{1.02} + \frac{2}{{1.02}^{2}} + \frac{102}{{1.02}^{3}} = 100\]

\[{PV}_{-} = \frac{2}{1.019} + \frac{2}{{1.019}^{2}} + \frac{102}{{1.019}^{3}} = 100.288951\]

\[{PV}_{+} = \frac{2}{1.021} + \frac{2}{{1.021}^{2}} + \frac{102}{{1.021}^{3}} = 99.71217249\]

\[\text{ApproxCon} = \frac{100.288951\ + 99.71217249\ – \lbrack 2 \times 100\rbrack}{(0.001)^{2} \times (100)} = 11.2349\]

Question

Which of the following factors most likely increases the convexity of a bond?

  1. Higher coupon rate
  2. Shorter maturity
  3. Lower yield-to-maturity (YTM)

Solution

The correct answer is C:

Lower YTM increases convexity.

A is incorrect: Lower coupon rates, not higher, increase convexity.

B is incorrect: Longer maturities, not shorter, increase convexity.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.