Financial Reporting – Presentation Choices

Financial Reporting – Presentation Choices

The presentation choices adopted by a company when preparing its financial statements can significantly influence analysts’ and other users’ opinions on these statements. These presentation choices include both GAAP and non-GAAP measures.

Presentation Choices That Influence Analyst Opinions

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) eliminates noisy reporting signals which are introduced by the employment of different accounting methods for depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, and restructuring charges among companies. Companies may construct and report “adjusted EBITDA” by excluding additional items such as rent payments for operating leases, equity-based compensation, acquisition-related charges, certain impairment charges, litigation costs, and loss/gain on debt extinguishments, from net income.

Lenders may demand that a borrower achieves and maintains a defined performance criteria by using GAAP net income as a starting point but arrive at a more “suitable” measure. The borrowing company may use this measure as its preferred non-GAAP metric in earnings releases. Indeed, it may also use it to describe its liquidity or solvency situation.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

If a company uses a non-GAAP financial measure in a SEC filing, it has to display the most directly comparable GAAP measure with equal prominence and provide a reconciliation of the two. The company’s management must also explain why it believes that the non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information regarding the company’s financial condition and operations. Above all, the company must disclose additional material purposes for which it uses the non-GAAP financial measures.

The SEC intended for the definition of non-GAAP financial measures should capture all measures. Note that these measures have the effect of depicting either a measure of performance that differs from the one presented in the financial statements or a measure of liquidity that differs from cash flow from operations computed under GAAP.

The SEC does not allow a company to exclude charges or liabilities requiring cash settlement from any non-GAAP liquidity measures, other than EBIT and EBITDA. The SEC also prohibits the calculation of a non-GAAP performance measure intended to eliminate or smooth items that are tagged as non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual when such items are extremely likely to recur.

Question 1

Which of the following statements is the least accurate?

  1. Companies may construct and report “adjusted EBITDA” by including additional items with net income.
  2. In SEC filings, a comparable GAAP measure must be displayed with equal prominence beside non-GAAP financial measures.
  3. The SEC prohibits a company from excluding charges or liabilities requiring cash settlement from any non-GAAP liquidity measures, other than EBIT and EBITDA.

Solution

The correct answer is A.

Companies may construct and report “adjusted EBITDA” by excluding, and not including, additional items from net income.

Options B and C are accurate statements.

Question 2

If a company uses a non-GAAP measure in its financial reports, it must disclose:

  1. The reason for using that measure.
  2. A reconciliation between that measure and the closest GAAP measure.
  3. Both the reason for using that measure and reconciliation between that measure and the closest GAAP measure.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

To use a non-GAAP measure, a company must disclose the reason for using the measure so that investors can judge its viability. In addition, the company must reconcile the measure to the closest measure to guide an investor to the closest alternative GAAP measure. Further, the company must clarify the difference between the two measures.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.