Measurement of Inventory at the Lower of Cost and Net Realisable Value

Measurement of Inventory at the Lower of Cost and Net Realisable Value

Under IFRS, inventories may be measured and carried on the balance sheet at a lower cost and net realizable value. US GAAP, on the other hand, specifies the lower cost or market to value inventories. Market value, for this purpose, is defined as the current replacement cost subject to upper and lower limits.

The net realizable value is defined as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale and estimated costs to get the inventory in condition for sale.

Measurement of Inventory at Lower of Cost and Net Realizable Value

The assessment of net realizable value under IFRS is typically done either item by item or by groups of similar or related items. If the value of inventory declines below the carrying amount on the balance sheet, the inventory carrying amount must be written down to its net realizable value. In addition, the loss should be recognized as an expense on the income statement. This expense can be included as part of the cost of sales or reported separately.

A new assessment of net realizable value should be made in each subsequent period. Reversal, which is limited to the amount of the original write-down, is required for a subsequent increase in the value of inventory that was previously written down. The reversal of any write-down of inventories is recognized as a reduction in the cost of sales.

US GAAP, although broadly consistent with IFRS, prohibits the reversal of write-downs. The market value cannot exceed the net realizable value given the fact that the lower limit is the net realizable value less a normal profit margin.

Question 1

Which of the following statements is least accurate?

  1. The reversal of write-downs is prohibited under US GAAP.
  2. The assessment of net realizable value is usually done either item by item or by groups of similar or related items.
  3. The lower of cost method refers to the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale and estimated costs to get the inventory in condition for sale.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

The net realizable value, not the lower of cost method, refers to the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale and estimated costs to get the inventory in condition for sale.

Options A and B provide accurate statements.

Question 2

To find the net realizable value of a company’s inventory, which of the following items ought to be deducted from the inventory’s expected selling price?

  1. Selling costs.
  2. Costs required to convert inventory into a sellable condition.
  3. Both selling costs and costs required to convert inventory into a sellable condition.

Solution

The correct answer is C.

The net realizable value of a company’s inventory could be figured out using the following equation:

Net realizable value = Selling price in an arm’s length transaction – Cost of sales – Cost required to convert inventory to sellable condition

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success

    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.