Expense Recognition

Expense Recognition

The IASB Conceptual Framework describes expenses as “decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the form of outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to equity participants.”

General Principles of Expense Recognition

A company recognizes expenses in the period that it consumes the economic benefits associated with the expenditure, or loses some previously recognized economic benefit.

Matching

Under the matching principle, a company recognizes some expenses (for example, cost of goods sold) whenever the associated revenues are recognized, thereby matching expenses and revenues. Matching requires that a company recognizes the cost of goods sold in the same period as revenues from the sale of the goods.

Period costs are expenditures that less directly match revenue, and are reflected in the period when a company has the expenditure or incurs a liability.

Matching Applied to Inventory and Cost of Goods Sold

Under the specific identification method, the inventory and cost of goods sold are based on their physical flow. IFRS and US GAAP, however, permit the use of the first in, first out (FIFO) method, and the weighted average cost method to assign costs.

The FIFO method assumes that the oldest goods that are purchased or manufactured are sold first while the newest goods purchased or manufactured remain in inventory. The cost of goods in the beginning inventory and the cost of the first items purchased or manufactured flow into the cost of goods sold first. This implies that the items that were purchased first are sold first. As a result, the ending inventory would include the most recent purchases.

Under the weighted average cost method, the average costs of goods available for sale are assigned to the units sold and the units remaining in inventory.

The last in, first out (LIFO) method can also be used to assign costs under US GAAP, but not under IFRS. Under LIFO, the newest goods that are purchased or manufactured are presumably sold first while the oldest goods to be purchased or manufactured are assumed to remain in inventory. As a result, the costs of the newest items purchased will flow into the costs of goods sold first, as if the items purchased most recently were sold first.

Specific Expense Recognition Applications

Doubtful accounts: using the matching principle, once revenue is recognized on a sale, a company is required to record an estimate of how much of the revenue will ultimately be uncollectible. This estimate is recorded as an expense on the income statement, not as a direct reduction of revenue.

Warranties: using the matching principle, companies are required to estimate the amount of future expenses which result from warranties. Besides, companies should recognize estimated warranty expenses in the periods of sale, and update the expenses as indicated by experience over the life of the warranties.

Depreciation and Amortization: depreciation describes the process of systematic allocation of the costs of long-lived assets over the period during which the long-lived assets are expected to provide any economic benefits. The term amortization is used whenever the long-lived assets are intangible and have a finite, useful life. There are several methods for computing depreciation. These include the straight-line method, diminishing balance method (declining balance method), and the units of production method.

  • Under the straight-line method, the cost of long-lived assets less the estimated residual value is allocated evenly over the estimated useful life of the asset.
  • The diminishing balance and the units of production methods are referred to as accelerated methods of depreciation. This is because they accelerate the timing of depreciation by allocating a greater proportion of the depreciation expense to the early years of an asset’s useful life. There is, therefore, a higher depreciation expense in the earlier years relative to the straight-line method. As a result, there are higher expenses and lower net income in the early depreciation years.

Implications of Expense Recognition Choices for Financial Analysis

The choice of depreciation or amortization method, as well as the estimate of useful life and residual value, can affect a company’s reported net income. In addition, the estimates that the company uses for doubtful accounts and warranty expenses can also affect its reported net income.

Knowledge of the monetary effect of differences in expense recognition policies and estimates can facilitate more meaningful comparisons across a number of companies or within a single company’s historical performance. This monetary effect may be used to adjust the reported expenses so that they are more comparable. However, if the monetary effects of differences in policies and estimates cannot be computed, it is also possible to characterize the relative conservatism of the policies and estimates and to qualitatively assess how such differences might affect reported expenses and financial ratios.

Question

If the cost of an asset is $100,000, and its residual value is estimated to be $10,000, while its useful life is estimated to be 6 years, what is the annual depreciation expense under the straight-line method?

  1. $1,500
  2. $15,000
  3. $90,000

Solution

The correct answer is B.

Annual depreciation expense = ($100,000 – $10,000)/6 years = $15,000.

Shop CFA® Exam Prep

Offered by AnalystPrep

Featured Shop FRM® Exam Prep Learn with Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter and keep up with the latest and greatest tips for success
    Shop Actuarial Exams Prep Shop Graduate Admission Exam Prep


    Sergio Torrico
    Sergio Torrico
    2021-07-23
    Excelente para el FRM 2 Escribo esta revisión en español para los hispanohablantes, soy de Bolivia, y utilicé AnalystPrep para dudas y consultas sobre mi preparación para el FRM nivel 2 (lo tomé una sola vez y aprobé muy bien), siempre tuve un soporte claro, directo y rápido, el material sale rápido cuando hay cambios en el temario de GARP, y los ejercicios y exámenes son muy útiles para practicar.
    diana
    diana
    2021-07-17
    So helpful. I have been using the videos to prepare for the CFA Level II exam. The videos signpost the reading contents, explain the concepts and provide additional context for specific concepts. The fun light-hearted analogies are also a welcome break to some very dry content. I usually watch the videos before going into more in-depth reading and they are a good way to avoid being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of content when you look at the readings.
    Kriti Dhawan
    Kriti Dhawan
    2021-07-16
    A great curriculum provider. James sir explains the concept so well that rather than memorising it, you tend to intuitively understand and absorb them. Thank you ! Grateful I saw this at the right time for my CFA prep.
    nikhil kumar
    nikhil kumar
    2021-06-28
    Very well explained and gives a great insight about topics in a very short time. Glad to have found Professor Forjan's lectures.
    Marwan
    Marwan
    2021-06-22
    Great support throughout the course by the team, did not feel neglected
    Benjamin anonymous
    Benjamin anonymous
    2021-05-10
    I loved using AnalystPrep for FRM. QBank is huge, videos are great. Would recommend to a friend
    Daniel Glyn
    Daniel Glyn
    2021-03-24
    I have finished my FRM1 thanks to AnalystPrep. And now using AnalystPrep for my FRM2 preparation. Professor Forjan is brilliant. He gives such good explanations and analogies. And more than anything makes learning fun. A big thank you to Analystprep and Professor Forjan. 5 stars all the way!
    michael walshe
    michael walshe
    2021-03-18
    Professor James' videos are excellent for understanding the underlying theories behind financial engineering / financial analysis. The AnalystPrep videos were better than any of the others that I searched through on YouTube for providing a clear explanation of some concepts, such as Portfolio theory, CAPM, and Arbitrage Pricing theory. Watching these cleared up many of the unclarities I had in my head. Highly recommended.